MFlenses - A new life in a digital age
MFLenses 2026

Manual Focus Lenses Forum

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.
logovectorizer.com
Spotlight

Featured partner placement for the forum front page.

testing my lenses part 140 - X-Kominar-T 135mm/2.8 DM
View previous topic :: View next topic  


Reply

samples made with Olympus E-M5.
fuji ax mount
this lens loses contrast when shooting in general direction of Sun, even though it has built in shade, otherwise not bad
pretty much all shots at f4













Reply

I just pulled one of these apart, it's sort of a Sonnar, two thick single meniscii at the front then a big very thick element and one or two small ones at the back.


Reply

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I just pulled one of these apart, it's sort of a Sonnar, two thick single meniscii at the front then a big very thick element and one or two small ones at the back.


too bad it's coating isn't up to scratch


Reply

Yes, the one I had was marked X-Fujinar and the coatings are a lot less colourful than a Fujinon with EBC, look a lot different.


Reply

not a bad lens for sure (I had the Porst labeled version).

If you own one.. use it and have fun.. if not better look for the x-Fujinon EBC 3.5/135. This small thing won't cost you more and even it's not much sharper.. the EBC coating makes it a little gem.


Reply

Tedat wrote:
not a bad lens for sure.

If you own one.. use it and have fun.. if not better look for the x-Fujinon EBC 3.5/135. This small thing won't cost you more and even it's not much sharper.. the EBC coating makes it a little gem.


i own both of them , and yes fujinon 135/3.5 is a nice lens
http://forum.mflenses.com/testing-my-lenses-part-133-ebc-x-fujinon-t-135mm-3-5-dm-t70626.html


Reply

I came across this lens for $15 at a thrift store. It will cost me more than this to get an AX to mFT adapter for my E-M5. Is it worth it? How does it compare to the OM Zuiko 135/3.5?


Reply

zuikowesty wrote:
I came across this lens for $15 at a thrift store. It will cost me more than this to get an AX to mFT adapter for my E-M5. Is it worth it? How does it compare to the OM Zuiko 135/3.5?


i would prefer the Zuiko
in AX mount EBC X-Fujinon-T 135mm/3.5 DM is better choice


Reply

WolverineX wrote:
zuikowesty wrote:
I came across this lens for $15 at a thrift store. It will cost me more than this to get an AX to mFT adapter for my E-M5. Is it worth it? How does it compare to the OM Zuiko 135/3.5?


i would prefer the Zuiko
in AX mount EBC X-Fujinon-T 135mm/3.5 DM is better choice


Thanks, had the Zuiko since the 70s, but finally sold most of my OM kit to fund my mFT upgrade from FT. Only kept a couple 50/1.8s and a 35/2.8. Having used a Rokinon 135/T2.2 FF Cine lens (big and heavy, but very sharp wide open on mFT) recently made me think about getting something like this again for outdoor portraits where the 40-150R doesn't quite do the trick. Should have kept my 135/3.5 I guess, as it was in mint condition, albeit early SC design.

Thanks for the info.