| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57981
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iangreenhalgh1
 Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
#10 is superb.  _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57981
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Thanks ! with little process these old lenses can perform very well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ForenSeil
 Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2731 Location: Kappeln, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
Hehe, how do always find these old gems?
How is the condition of the lens? _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Laowa 100/2.8 2x, Nikon 200/2 ED |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57981
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| ForenSeil wrote: |
Hehe, how do always find these old gems?
How is the condition of the lens? |
Nice , clean, scratch free. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
martinsmith99
 Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 7002 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
The lack of modern coating shows in the contrast.
I think somewhere between #11 & #12 would be good in PP. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57981
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| martinsmith99 wrote: |
The lack of modern coating shows in the contrast.
I think somewhere between #11 & #12 would be good in PP. |
Indeed, I think this lens has not much coating left , probably nothing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skida
 Joined: 02 Mar 2012 Posts: 1826 Location: North East England
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
skida wrote:
Just to be different I like number 4, shot into the light with a slight mist in the air. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57981
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| skida wrote: |
| Just to be different I like number 4, shot into the light with a slight mist in the air. |
Yes, low contrast can be charm too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|