View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
55
Joined: 13 May 2013 Posts: 709 Location: U.S.
Expire: 2022-06-15
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 6:12 am Post subject: Soligor Tele-Auto 135mm f/1.8 history |
|
|
55 wrote:
Greetings,
While searching the internet for information about my Soligor 135mm f/1.8 lens, I found a listing of serial number codes for Soligor lens makers here:
https://www.flickr.com/groups/314250@N25/discuss/72157625238376083/
(I looked but couldn't find this list on mflenses.com itself.)
Does anyone know how far back in time those codes are valid? Do they go back as far as 1971?
According to the list I linked to, my Soligor 135 with serial number 6710239 may have been built by Komine in 1971.
Can anyone confirm or deny this?
Here's my lens:
[/img] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10531 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 12:08 pm Post subject: Re: Soligor Tele-Auto 135mm f/1.8 history |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
55 wrote: |
Greetings,
While searching the internet for information about my Soligor 135mm f/1.8 lens, I found a listing of serial number codes for Soligor lens makers here:
https://www.flickr.com/groups/314250@N25/discuss/72157625238376083/
(I looked but couldn't find this list on mflenses.com itself.)
Does anyone know how far back in time those codes are valid? Do they go back as far as 1971?
According to the list I linked to, my Soligor 135 with serial number 6710239 may have been built by Komine in 1971.
Can anyone confirm or deny this?
Here's my lens:
[/img] |
Welcome 55
There is a link to the original mflenses thread on the Flickr page: http://forum.mflenses.com/soligor-12-8-f28mm-21and-versions-t30866,highlight,soligor++28mm.html _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gardener
Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
I doubt it's 1971. Old Sigma catalog claims that their 135/1.8 the fastest on the market, and Sigma itself suggests that their XQ series of lenses came about around 1975.
I also don't think it's a Komine lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
55
Joined: 13 May 2013 Posts: 709 Location: U.S.
Expire: 2022-06-15
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 4:48 pm Post subject: Re: Soligor Tele-Auto 135mm f/1.8 history |
|
|
55 wrote:
Ha! Hidden in plain sight. Thank you for the welcome and the pointer, visualopsins.
Hmm, it looks like there's a lot of good reading in your Soligor 28 thread.
Gardener wrote: |
I doubt it's 1971. Old Sigma catalog claims that their 135/1.8 the fastest on the market, and Sigma itself suggests that their XQ series of lenses came about around 1975.
I also don't think it's a Komine lens. |
Thanks for the insight, Gardener. I'm going to enjoy looking through that Sigma catalog!
I have a handful of 1970s photo magazines. I'll have a look through them and see if they have any relevant information. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2927 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
Just based on livery my guess would be Kiron. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
55
Joined: 13 May 2013 Posts: 709 Location: U.S.
Expire: 2022-06-15
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
55 wrote:
jamaeolus wrote: |
Just based on livery my guess would be Kiron. |
Thanks for commenting, jamaeolus. Here's another picture of my lens.
The silver piece just beneath the front lens cap was originally black, but I removed the finish because I like the zebra look!
I haven't taken many shots with my lens yet, but here's one from yesterday which I like.
(Crabapple tree, with Canon 5D at f/1.8)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gardener
Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
The mount labels are in standard Sigma YS font. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
55
Joined: 13 May 2013 Posts: 709 Location: U.S.
Expire: 2022-06-15
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
55 wrote:
Gardener wrote: |
The mount labels are in standard Sigma YS font. |
Indeed, the lens does have a YS mount. I should've mentioned that earlier.
Was the YS mount used only on Sigma manufactured lenses? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
YS was also used on Sun and Sankor (Nissin).
I have examples of these others also. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10531 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
From http://visualopsins.weebly.com/literature.html
_________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gardener
Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
55
Joined: 13 May 2013 Posts: 709 Location: U.S.
Expire: 2022-06-15
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
55 wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
YS was also used on Sun and Sankor (Nissin).
I have examples of these others also. |
Thanks for the information, Luis.
$100 for a 135 f/1.8? They cost a bit more than that today! And it's also interesting to see that YS mount guide.
Thank you, visualopsins.
In fact, I've been wondering about the relationship between my Soligor 135 and Spiratone 135s. There's an informative chart comparing different 135mm f/1.8 lenses which was created by MFlenses member DSG. You can see the chart here:
http://forum.mflenses.com/raynox-polaris-135mm-f-1-8-t76153.html
Even though the chart was posted by someone other than DSG in that topic, I'm reluctant to post it here myself because I've previously been scolded for sharing an image on MFlenses which wasn't mine. I've messaged DSG to ask permission, but I haven't heard back yet.
To those who know, is it okay for me to share that chart here if I give credit to DSG (Alf Beharie)? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2927 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
Upon further reflection Sun or Sigma definitely seem more likely. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10531 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
From http://forum.mflenses.com/raynox-polaris-135mm-f-1-8-t76153.html _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
55
Joined: 13 May 2013 Posts: 709 Location: U.S.
Expire: 2022-06-15
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
55 wrote:
jamaeolus wrote: |
Upon further reflection Sun or Sigma definitely seem more likely. |
Yes, it's a puzzle...
Aha! Problem solved. Thank you very much for your help, visualopsins.
Okay, now that people can see the chart, I'll add what I know about my lens.
My (auto) Soligor looks just like the Soligor on Alf's chart (except for the piece I removed the finish from). So when I opened my lens to clean it, I expected to find that giant triplet in the center. But I didn't.
Instead, my lens has the same four group, six element layout as the Spiratone / Yoshida version. If you compare the Soligor to the Spiratone / Yoshida, the bodies look similar so it wouldn't be surprising if both were made by the same manufacturer. Whether that was Yoshida or someone else..?
On ebay I've seen the preset Soligor 135 f/1.8 with its original box. And the optical diagram on the box was the same as the one shown for Soligor on Alf's chart.
And I guess the consensus about my original question is, no, Komine probably wasn't the maker of my lens.
But I'd still be interested to know if anyone has a timetable for the Soligor lens serial number code?
Here are the elements from my lens:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gardener
Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
I am 99% certain Sigma also produced generic versions. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6008 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Interestingly, the Soligor was made by Tokina, but only seems to have appeared as the Soligor and no other brands.
I have the Soligor 135mm f2 which is also made by Tokina.
I wonder if it has a similar lens schematic.
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
55
Joined: 13 May 2013 Posts: 709 Location: U.S.
Expire: 2022-06-15
|
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
55 wrote:
Gardener wrote: |
I am 99% certain Sigma also produced generic versions. |
Well, whoever made my Auto Soligor, I'm happy they did because I enjoy owning it!
Oldhand wrote: |
Interestingly, the Soligor was made by Tokina, but only seems to have appeared as the Soligor and no other brands.
I have the Soligor 135mm f2 which is also made by Tokina.
I wonder if it has a similar lens schematic.
Tom |
Tom, here's a page from a Soligor CD lens booklet I have:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6008 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
55 wrote: |
Gardener wrote: |
I am 99% certain Sigma also produced generic versions. |
Well, whoever made my Auto Soligor, I'm happy they did because I enjoy owning it!
Oldhand wrote: |
Interestingly, the Soligor was made by Tokina, but only seems to have appeared as the Soligor and no other brands.
I have the Soligor 135mm f2 which is also made by Tokina.
I wonder if it has a similar lens schematic.
Tom |
Tom, here's a page from a Soligor CD lens booklet I have:
|
Thank you - that's great.
Nothing like the 1.8/135 then.
If anything it is a more like the Pentax -or perhaps the Sigma -
than any of the others
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|