View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 5:29 am Post subject: Soligor 350/5.6 - a very odd "Wundertute" |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
I just aquired another old "Wundertute" long lens, this one a Soligor 350/5.6 . Its the usual T-mount, pre-set item from the 1960's.
It came in quite worn and dirty condition, but perfectly functional, for a very nominal price (less than $10). There is a missing locking screw for the tripod mount though. It works very much like the 400mm Spiratone, though as it is shorter both physically and in focal length it is a little more practical. Its really quite a pleasure to use.
So, what is odd about this lens ?
- It is a very odd length. I don't remember seeing any other 350mm lenses. I think this thing is rather rare.
- It is definitely an early Tamron, a model 750 of 1963 -
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://www.tamron.co.jp/data/old-lens/olm350f5_6.htm
Every feature is identical.
I think Soligor sometime in the early-mid 1960's marketed a range of Tamron T-mount lenses. I know that they also sold the rather unique 250/4.5, which I am also looking for, plus the 135/2.8, 200/4.5 and probably others. I have a rather nice pre-set Soligor 180/3.5 that doesn't seem to be a Tamron, so not all Soligor pre-sets were Tamrons.
So how well does it do ? I have to say its not quite as good as the Spiratone or the Komura 400's. It has more color fringing and is not quite as sharp wide open. But it is perfectly adequate for my purposes, and easier to use and carry than those others. Its even lighter than my 300mm Sears, though that also beats it in image quality.
All at f/5.6 -
The bird -
100% crop -
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
montecarlo
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 1865 Location: Romania
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
montecarlo wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for the samples. It looks to be a good lens and despite how old it is it seems to have a good contrast (or did you add it in postprocessing?).
My T mount Soligor (same age, I think), a 135mm f:2.8 has poor contrast and can not take the race with my most contrasty lenses: the SMC coated ones ( one manual and two auto focus lenses). _________________ Canonet QL17 III
Zenit E , Helios-44 58mm f:2.0 , Tair-11A 135mm f:2.8, Jupiter-9 85mm f:2.0,
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35mm f:2.4
Pentax MX, ME Super, Chinon CE4/CM4, Petri MC 28mm f:2, smc Pentax-M 50mm f:1.7, Soligor T 135mm f:2.8
Minolta X500, Tokina 28/2.8, Rokkor 50/1.7, 80-205/4.5
Nikon D90, Nikkor 35/2.0, Nikkor 50/1.8, Sigma 24/2.8, Nikkor 18-105 VR |
|
Back to top |
|
|
padiej
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 244 Location: AUSTRIA - Burgenland
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
padiej wrote:
Wonderfull tube, superb pictures.
Which cam did you use?
regards Peter _________________ Cam: Canon EOS 5D, 50D, 500D, Pentax Ist DL
Lenses on
www.flickr.com/photos/padiej/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
With your talent every lens are singing! Very nice demo! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Apparently a surprisingly good lens! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Hi Montecarlo,
I usually underexpose a little and correct in Photoshop using the brightness and contrast settings to adjust.
In this set #3 and #4 were not adjusted for contrast at all I believe. I don't see a contrast problem with this lens.
My Soligor 135/2.8 preset is a little soft and flares a little at f/2.8, but it also doesn't seem to have a contrast problem.
This is a 600 dpi film scan of a shot from the Sears/Ricoh TLS with the Soligor 135 on Fuji color print film, not processed in Photoshop - my daughter in a backyard Shakespeare production -
Hi Padiej,
Pentax K100D
Thanks all, but as I said before, if you take enough, some will be good. My shot counter on the K100D went past 10,000 last week, and that is in four months. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bawang
Joined: 26 Mar 2008 Posts: 548 Location: Indiana, USA
|
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bawang wrote:
These are good, the contrast as seen in the lamp post do indicated how good these old lens can perform. Good job. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|