View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
e6filmuser
Joined: 12 Nov 2010 Posts: 583 Location: Reading UK
|
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 7:56 am Post subject: Schneider-Kreuznach Apo-Componon HM 2.8/4.0 at Infinity |
|
|
e6filmuser wrote:
Well maybe 200 feet and at f11. I was surprised to find this 2013 image in my files:
Cropped ca 50% laterally only. _________________ Dedicated to using manual focus lenses with digital. Equiped for photography from macro to panoramic & from ultra-wide to extreme telephoto. Mostly shooting outdoor macro. Experienced entomological taxonomist. Some knowledge of mushrooms. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
pretty good - as expected! _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
e6filmuser
Joined: 12 Nov 2010 Posts: 583 Location: Reading UK
|
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
e6filmuser wrote:
For those who don't know, it is an enlarger lens.
I bought it for macro, an example from 2013:
_________________ Dedicated to using manual focus lenses with digital. Equiped for photography from macro to panoramic & from ultra-wide to extreme telephoto. Mostly shooting outdoor macro. Experienced entomological taxonomist. Some knowledge of mushrooms. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simple.joy
Joined: 30 May 2022 Posts: 444
|
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
simple.joy wrote:
e6filmuser wrote: |
For those who don't know, it is an enlarger lens.
I bought it for macro, an example from 2013:
|
Interesting. I think it's a good lens for macro, but actually found it really disappointing in the corners (even close-up, where for example the cheap Osawa /Hoya/Bogen 40 mm f/3.5 enlarging lens does give it a run for its money.) Would be surprised to see it holds up on the edges at infinity... but you never know. What's your assessment there?
But like I've mentioned - for macro shots it does work pretty well:
F-sharp falling flat! by simple.joy, on Flickr _________________ ---
Manual lens enthusiast
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
e6filmuser
Joined: 12 Nov 2010 Posts: 583 Location: Reading UK
|
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
e6filmuser wrote:
Here is the entire frame prior to cropping. The corners look OK to me.
This test shot was just to satisfy my curiosity about infinity focus and no more.
_________________ Dedicated to using manual focus lenses with digital. Equiped for photography from macro to panoramic & from ultra-wide to extreme telephoto. Mostly shooting outdoor macro. Experienced entomological taxonomist. Some knowledge of mushrooms. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simple.joy
Joined: 30 May 2022 Posts: 444
|
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
simple.joy wrote:
e6filmuser wrote: |
Here is the entire frame prior to cropping. The corners look OK to me.
This test shot was just to satisfy my curiosity about infinity focus and no more.
|
It‘s indeed okay but that‘s at f/11, correct? Have you tried shooting at f/4 or f/5.6? Perhaps the lens is better at distance - it would be surprising to me however. _________________ ---
Manual lens enthusiast
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
e6filmuser
Joined: 12 Nov 2010 Posts: 583 Location: Reading UK
|
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
e6filmuser wrote:
No, but that would be way down my list of priorities, being unlikely to be the choice over other lenses for anything other than close-up or macro. Maybe when we have a long period of fine weather. _________________ Dedicated to using manual focus lenses with digital. Equiped for photography from macro to panoramic & from ultra-wide to extreme telephoto. Mostly shooting outdoor macro. Experienced entomological taxonomist. Some knowledge of mushrooms. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simple.joy
Joined: 30 May 2022 Posts: 444
|
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
simple.joy wrote:
e6filmuser wrote: |
No, but that would be way down my list of priorities, being unlikely to be the choice over other lenses for anything other than close-up or macro. Maybe when we have a long period of fine weather. |
Yes, you've certainly got a point there! Just wanted to mention my impression and ask if you made similar observations... I think some of the 40 mm WA lenses (like the Rodagon WA 40 mm f/4 for example) might be a better choice if you're not going to shoot at f/2.8. But I've not tested mine nearly enough to get a good impression of the strengths and limits of the Apo-Componon HM 40 mm f/2.8... _________________ ---
Manual lens enthusiast
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
e6filmuser
Joined: 12 Nov 2010 Posts: 583 Location: Reading UK
|
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
e6filmuser wrote:
simple.joy wrote: |
e6filmuser wrote: |
No, but that would be way down my list of priorities, being unlikely to be the choice over other lenses for anything other than close-up or macro. Maybe when we have a long period of fine weather. |
Yes, you've certainly got a point there! Just wanted to mention my impression and ask if you made similar observations... I think some of the 40 mm WA lenses (like the Rodagon WA 40 mm f/4 for example) might be a better choice if you're not going to shoot at f/2.8. But I've not tested mine nearly enough to get a good impression of the strengths and limits of the Apo-Componon HM 40 mm f/2.8... |
For several years, I was using this lens as my main high mag macro lens but it has been superseded by my Laowa 25mm x2.5 to x5. I do not share the liking of many here for wide open aperture photography, even for testing. So any such testing I do is purely for curiosity. That does not mean I would not do such a test, eventually. In fact, only this afternoon, the first result of my search about this lens found a statement of "fact" that it cannot focus at infinity. OK, I am using "infinity" loosely but my post can now be located by a search. Thanks for your interest and comments. _________________ Dedicated to using manual focus lenses with digital. Equiped for photography from macro to panoramic & from ultra-wide to extreme telephoto. Mostly shooting outdoor macro. Experienced entomological taxonomist. Some knowledge of mushrooms. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simple.joy
Joined: 30 May 2022 Posts: 444
|
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
simple.joy wrote:
e6filmuser wrote: |
For several years, I was using this lens as my main high mag macro lens but it has been superseded by my Laowa 25mm x2.5 to x5. I do not share the liking of many here for wide open aperture photography, even for testing. So any such testing I do is purely for curiosity. |
Yeah, I realize that people have different preferences there... You can't imagine how many times people have tried to explain to me that I "just need to stop the lens down", as if I wasn't aware of the possibility. 😉 It's just a matter of taste I guess and what kind of vision you have in mind for a shot. I feel like there's no right or wrong there, to be honest and I've always been fascinated to hear the reasoning of people, regardless of what their preference is.
e6filmuser wrote: |
In fact, only this afternoon, the first result of my search about this lens found a statement of "fact" that it cannot focus at infinity. OK, I am using "infinity" loosely but my post can now be located by a search. |
Which lens, the Laowa 25 mm 2-5x?
e6filmuser wrote: |
Thanks for your interest and comments. |
Thank you as well! 👍 _________________ ---
Manual lens enthusiast
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
e6filmuser
Joined: 12 Nov 2010 Posts: 583 Location: Reading UK
|
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2024 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
e6filmuser wrote:
simple.joy wrote: |
e6filmuser wrote: |
In fact, only this afternoon, the first result of my search about this lens found a statement of "fact" that it cannot focus at infinity. OK, I am using "infinity" loosely but my post can now be located by a search. |
Which lens, the Laowa 25 mm 2-5x? |
The HM40. Loawa will not, nor will my Printing-Nikkors, even focus for moderate close-ups e.g. 1:10.
Meanwhile, I have another lens in the post to me! _________________ Dedicated to using manual focus lenses with digital. Equiped for photography from macro to panoramic & from ultra-wide to extreme telephoto. Mostly shooting outdoor macro. Experienced entomological taxonomist. Some knowledge of mushrooms. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simple.joy
Joined: 30 May 2022 Posts: 444
|
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2024 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
simple.joy wrote:
e6filmuser wrote: |
simple.joy wrote: |
e6filmuser wrote: |
In fact, only this afternoon, the first result of my search about this lens found a statement of "fact" that it cannot focus at infinity. OK, I am using "infinity" loosely but my post can now be located by a search. |
Which lens, the Laowa 25 mm 2-5x? |
The HM40. Loawa will not, nor will my Printing-Nikkors, even focus for moderate close-ups e.g. 1:10.
Meanwhile, I have another lens in the post to me! |
I'm not surprised in case of the Laowa, as it was specifically made for high magnification macro. When it comes to the HM40 and Printing-Nikkors, it is because of your system or camera, right? Both lenses focus to infinity on mirrorless without any problem, but of course you wouldn't even want to see what the Printing Nikkor does at that distance... 😅
Looking forward to hearing about your new lens, if you're going to share it here! Meanwhile I'm trying to sell some lenses... enough is enough! 😱 _________________ ---
Manual lens enthusiast
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
e6filmuser
Joined: 12 Nov 2010 Posts: 583 Location: Reading UK
|
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2024 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
e6filmuser wrote:
simple.joy wrote: |
I'm not surprised in case of the Laowa, as it was specifically made for high magnification macro. When it comes to the HM40 and Printing-Nikkors, it is because of your system or camera, right? Both lenses focus to infinity on mirrorless without any problem, but of course you wouldn't even want to see what the Printing Nikkor does at that distance... 😅 |
Quite right. I was having a Senior Moment there. They can be made to, on a suitable extension, as did the HM40, but their optimisation is at around 1;1. _________________ Dedicated to using manual focus lenses with digital. Equiped for photography from macro to panoramic & from ultra-wide to extreme telephoto. Mostly shooting outdoor macro. Experienced entomological taxonomist. Some knowledge of mushrooms. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|