Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Rokkor 200mm f3.5
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2013 9:55 am    Post subject: Re: Rokkor 200mm f3.5 Reply with quote

philslizzy wrote:
In all I'm very impressed with the quality of this lens but handling is a pain, its heavy and as a result not easy to focus fast.

Have you checked it wide open? Is CA big problem then? I've put mine on the shelf because of that (see http://forum.mflenses.com/minolta-rokkor-qf-200-3-5-t30761.html for details). I'm wondering whether it was my copy or is it general property of that lens...


PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2013 4:16 pm    Post subject: Re: Rokkor 200mm f3.5 Reply with quote

pavko wrote:
philslizzy wrote:
In all I'm very impressed with the quality of this lens but handling is a pain, its heavy and as a result not easy to focus fast.

Have you checked it wide open? Is CA big problem then? I've put mine on the shelf because of that (see http://forum.mflenses.com/minolta-rokkor-qf-200-3-5-t30761.html for details). I'm wondering whether it was my copy or is it general property of that lens...


I spotted a little yesterday. here is the pic shrunk for the forum and a 100% crop showing a little CA. You can see the pixels at this magnification so it may not be too much problem.





Not enough to put me off it!!


PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2013 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks tiny compared to the image size.
I agree it looks tiny when compared to total image size but if your making large prints it would be a worry.


PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2013 4:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

parabellumfoto wrote:

... if your making large prints it would be a worry.


Thats not gonna happen soon. I use different equipment when shooting for large prints.

I understand there's a way to remove CA in photoshop, I've seen it mentioned but a tip on how to do it would be nice.

Anyone??


PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 3:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Use the "Lens Correction" function in the "Filter" menu, it features three sliders in the "Chromatic Aberrations" tab.


PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dennis wrote:
Use the "Lens Correction" function in the "Filter" menu, it features three sliders in the "Chromatic Aberrations" tab.


Cheers dennis I found it but a lot was greyed out and the custom didnt seem to do anything. I'll go back to it. But some of the other stuff was interesting.

Thanks


PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I detailed a procedure in a post once. I'll see if I can find it before recreating.


PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 11:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Found it.

In PS, you simply enlarge the image enough to see the CA clearly, then go to Image - Adjustments - Hue/Saturation. Then change the menu selection where it says Master to the color you're correcting, most cases blue, but sometimes magenta. If you're wrong, it will correct the selection. Then take the pointer, which is now an eyedropper tool, and click on the CA where the color is obvious. You'll then see that color come up in your swatch selection. Now take the saturation and lightness sliders and find the best reductions to correct the CA. I typically do them about equally, but you can see the change as you're doing it and will know how much to adjust. Note: don't forget to select the color from the Master, otherwise the entire image will be effected, not just the CA color/area.


PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 11:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok I tried it, its not got all of the CA but I concentrated on the gloved hand. the lifebelt seems to have lost its colour too but If i use 'auto color' it (sort of) comes back.

Thanks for that useful tip. I'll look more into it. Although the CA is not that much of a problem.




PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your offending fringe was magenta or red, so you would have selected magenta from the drop down menu and if it Photoshop recognized it as a different color, it would correct you choice when you sampled the color with the eyedropper. It is important to be selective of color in that drop down, otherwise leaving it as "Master" will change the entire picture. There are times when the same color tone will exist elsewhere in the photo as may have happened with yours. In those cases, you can isolate an area for treatment using one of the drawing tools like the "Polygonal Lasso Tool". Or you can return a color to original using the history brush. Red CA is a little harder to correct than blue.