View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ballu
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 912 Location: Columbus, OH. USofA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 4:19 pm Post subject: Prakticar PB mount: Pentacon Prakticar 135mm f2.8 |
|
|
Ballu wrote:
I got this lens few months back, but not able to try... I had to sand EOS-PB adapter to very thin sheet to get infinity focus....
Some shots, all wide open...
I am really liking this lens... pretty small for f2.8 speed with inbuilt hood... _________________ -Ballu
http://balyanpage.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lEo.
Joined: 08 Apr 2009 Posts: 35 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lEo. wrote:
I had one before which is marked with "carl zeiss jena"
It gives out sharp pictures and good bokeh
The only thing that i do not like is it has 6 aperture blades only. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ballu
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 912 Location: Columbus, OH. USofA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ballu wrote:
lEo. wrote: |
The only thing that i do not like is it has 6 aperture blades only. |
And why thats bad or "not likable"... _________________ -Ballu
http://balyanpage.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lEo.
Joined: 08 Apr 2009 Posts: 35 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lEo. wrote:
Ballu wrote: |
lEo. wrote: |
The only thing that i do not like is it has 6 aperture blades only. |
And why thats bad or "not likable"... |
oh that is my personal taste
I like circular bokeh and lens flare more than hexagon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ballu
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 912 Location: Columbus, OH. USofA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ballu wrote:
lEo. wrote: |
I like circular bokeh and lens flare more than hexagon |
To me, large number of blades are legacy of era when optical defects were not manageable... Most of those lenses fails miserably in bright light source situations (try Jupiter with blurred light source).
If I remember correctly, Nikkor 55/1.2 (or 50) has 6-blades and always creates circular and true/flawless bokeh...
Again, its all subjective and personal... _________________ -Ballu
http://balyanpage.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Seele
Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 742 Location: Sydney Australia
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seele wrote:
Ballu wrote: |
To me, large number of blades are legacy of era when optical defects were not manageable... Most of those lenses fails miserably in bright light source situations (try Jupiter with blurred light source).
If I remember correctly, Nikkor 55/1.2 (or 50) has 6-blades and always creates circular and true/flawless bokeh...
Again, its all subjective and personal... |
Not quite:
When iris diaphragm first came into being, most likely used by Lancaster on their own-brand lenses, they just tried to make it round as a matter of course, and as the iris mechanism was closed down manually there was no need to reduce number of blades. It is only after the advent of the 35mm reflex cameras and the need for automatic operation of iris, as in shutting down and opening up, that the number of blades were reduced, for the mechanics could not (and still cannot) handle the load demanded by moving a large number of iris blades, each held at opposite ends. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|