View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Big Dawg
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:49 pm Post subject: Pentax Spotmatic SP500 |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Very nice camera I just revieved off Ebay for $10.50 plus $9.50 shipping. Pentax wanted an entrance level SLR so they changed the SP1000 stamp on top to SP500 and changed the marking on the speed setting dial from a 1000 top shutter speed to a 500 top shutter speed. The SP1000 and the SP 500 are identical except for those 2 changes. So you can turn the SP500's shutter speed dial one click past 500 and you get 1000.
I need to do some minor clean up but it is in super nice condition. It came with the Super Takumar 55mm f/2 lens which should sell all by itself for around 30-50 dollars. Really a very nice deal. I was blessed to get this at that low price.
![](http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/201112/1100__IGP5411_1.jpg) _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Nesster
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
Congrats, that's a great price - and the SP500 / SP1000 are my favorites - I don't miss the timer switch, and they retain the original prism hump.
I've found that just about every mechanical Pentax shutter from those days will be capping when it's cold or the shutter speed is fast. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Big Dawg
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Nesster wrote: |
Congrats, that's a great price - and the SP500 / SP1000 are my favorites - I don't miss the timer switch, and they retain the original prism hump.
I've found that just about every mechanical Pentax shutter from those days will be capping when it's cold or the shutter speed is fast. |
Thanks Jussi. My K1000 is still my favorite film SLR but my SP, SP F and now this one are close seconds. You can feel the quality if you hold one. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
GrahamNR17
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
Ahh Pentax, the Japanese Leica. Beautiful, gorgeous, wonderful to use. Cut me in half, I have Pentax written right through me. There's no need for any other maker to exist. ![Cool](images/smiles/icon_cool.gif) |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Big Dawg
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
GrahamNR17 wrote: |
Ahh Pentax, the Japanese Leica. Beautiful, gorgeous, wonderful to use. Cut me in half, I have Pentax written right through me. There's no need for any other maker to exist. ![Cool](images/smiles/icon_cool.gif) |
I feel that way too but I still like my DX6490....don't you? _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
GrahamNR17
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
Big Dawg wrote: |
GrahamNR17 wrote: |
Ahh Pentax, the Japanese Leica. Beautiful, gorgeous, wonderful to use. Cut me in half, I have Pentax written right through me. There's no need for any other maker to exist. ![Cool](images/smiles/icon_cool.gif) |
I feel that way too but I still like my DX6490....don't you? |
Heck yes! Kodak excelled themselves with that one. Good enough to be a Pentax, IMHO ![Cool](images/smiles/icon_cool.gif) |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Big Dawg
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
GrahamNR17 wrote: |
Big Dawg wrote: |
GrahamNR17 wrote: |
Ahh Pentax, the Japanese Leica. Beautiful, gorgeous, wonderful to use. Cut me in half, I have Pentax written right through me. There's no need for any other maker to exist. ![Cool](images/smiles/icon_cool.gif) |
I feel that way too but I still like my DX6490....don't you? |
Heck yes! Kodak excelled themselves with that one. Good enough to be a Pentax, IMHO ![Cool](images/smiles/icon_cool.gif) |
My granddaughter is still using mine every day. One really great little camera. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
gmonkman1
Joined: 08 Jun 2011 Posts: 45 Location: se of Winnipeg Manitoba
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gmonkman1 wrote:
Hello Big Dawg;
the old pentax cameras are truly wonderful machines.
I remember that i bought a camera just like the one you have and
it also had a little dent in the prism housing. After getting the pictures
back from the first roll I noticed that the low light/wide open shots
were very out of focus but I remember being very careful to focus
on the eyes. While pondering what could be wrong I measured out
exactly ten feet and focused. Checking the distance scale on the lens
I noted that it was way off of ten feet. Problem solved but I at least
got to keep the good 55/1.8 lens that was on that faulty body. I
believe that the prism was out of alignment causing error focus.
To summarize... I hope this camera works out for you and that
you do not have the same problem I did.
Wish you well on these winter holidays
GM |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Big Dawg
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
gmonkman1 wrote: |
Hello Big Dawg;
the old pentax cameras are truly wonderful machines.
I remember that i bought a camera just like the one you have and
it also had a little dent in the prism housing. After getting the pictures
back from the first roll I noticed that the low light/wide open shots
were very out of focus but I remember being very careful to focus
on the eyes. While pondering what could be wrong I measured out
exactly ten feet and focused. Checking the distance scale on the lens
I noted that it was way off of ten feet. Problem solved but I at least
got to keep the good 55/1.8 lens that was on that faulty body. I
believe that the prism was out of alignment causing error focus.
To summarize... I hope this camera works out for you and that
you do not have the same problem I did.
Wish you well on these winter holidays
GM |
Thanks for that info GM. I too hope it is focusing correctly. I'll see soon as I intend to run a roll of film through it this weekend. And Happy Holidays to you as well. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
fish4570
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 06 Jan 2010 Posts: 4514 Location: At the confluence of the Locust Fork of the Warrior River and Black Creek, Alabama
Expire: 2012-03-21
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fish4570 wrote:
i'd still have mine if it had interchangeable corrective eyepieces. such a well-handling machine ...[/code] _________________ Paul
I chase Light
http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Big Dawg
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
fish4570 wrote: |
i'd still have mine if it had interchangeable corrective eyepieces. such a well-handling machine ...[/code] |
They are a little harder to see the focus. I get by with mine but that is the one thing that sometimes causes a bad photo. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
CarbonR
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 31 Dec 2008 Posts: 1969 Location: Clermont-Ferrand, France
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CarbonR wrote:
fish4570 wrote: |
i'd still have mine if it had interchangeable corrective eyepieces. such a well-handling machine ...[/code] |
Such parts do exists but are quite rare, I only have one or two of them... _________________ Cameras : Canon 5D, Pentax K100D, Pentax 6x7, Spotmatic
Lenses : 15mm to 1000mm (24x36)
My websites : [FR & ENG]Takumar - the eyes of the Spotmatic : info about all Takumar lenses // Kogaku - My photo site
I am selling : Takumar lenses and rare Pentax bodies, pm me if you're interested in something [MFLenses feed-back]
Information on Takumar lenses with samples :
Wide angle : Takumar 15/3.5 15mm, Takumar 17/4 17mm, Takumar 18/11 18mm, Takumar 20/4.5 20mm, Takumar 24/3.5 24mm, Takumar 28/3.5 V1 28mm, Takumar 28/3.5 V2 28mm, Takumar 35/2 V1 35mm, Takumar 35/2 V2 35mm, Takumar 35/2.3 35mm, Takumar 35/3.5 35mm, Takumar 35/4 35mm
Standard : Takumar 50/1.4 V1 50mm, Takumar 50/1.4 V2 50mm, Takumar 50/3.5 50mm, Takumar 50/4 50mm, Takumar 55/2 55/1.8 55mm, Takumar 55/2.2 V1 55mm, Takumar 55/2.2 V2 55mm, Takumar 58/2 58mm, Takumar 58/2.4 58mm
Short tele : Takumar 83/1.9 83mm, Takumar 85/1.8 85/1.9 85mm, Takumar 85/1.8 85mm, Takumar 100/2 100mm, Takumar 100/3.5 100mm, Takumar 100/4 100mm, Takumar 105/2.8 V1 105mm, Takumar 105/2.8 V2 105mm, Takumar 120/2.8 120mm
Telephoto : Takumar 135/2.5 V1 135mm, Takumar 135/2.5 V2 135mm, Takumar 135/3.5 V1 135mm, Takumar 135/3.5 V2 135mm, Takumar 150/4 V1 150mm, Takumar 150/4 V2 150mm
Long tele : Takumar 200/3.5 200mm, Takumar 200/4 200mm, Takumar 200/5.6 200mm, Takumar 300/4 V1 300mm, Takumar 300/4 V2 300mm, Takumar 300/4 V3 300mm, Takumar 300/6.3 300mm, Takumar 400/5.6 400mm, Takumar 500/4.5 500mm, Takumar 500/5 500mm, Takumar 1000/8 V1 1000mm, Takumar 1000/8 V2 1000mm
Zoom : Zoom-Takumar 45~125/4 , Zoom-Takumar 70~150/4.5 , Zoom-Takumar 85~210/4.5 , Zoom-Takumar 135~600/6.7
Achromatic : Ultra-Achromatic-Takumar 85/4.5 , Ultra-Achromatic-Takumar 300/5.6 300mm |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
visualopsins
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10694 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
CarbonR wrote: |
fish4570 wrote: |
i'd still have mine if it had interchangeable corrective eyepieces. such a well-handling machine ...[/code] |
Such parts do exists but are quite rare, I only have one or two of them... |
1. Spotmatic viewfinder accessories, such as right-angle finder and magnifying eyepiece, fit my Canon K2 (film), 350D, and 5Dc cameras.
2. Canon makes eyepiece diopters
3. ![Question](images/smiles/icon_question.gif) _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Big Dawg
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
CarbonR wrote: |
fish4570 wrote: |
i'd still have mine if it had interchangeable corrective eyepieces. such a well-handling machine ...[/code] |
Such parts do exists but are quite rare, I only have one or two of them... |
1. Spotmatic viewfinder accessories, such as right-angle finder and magnifying eyepiece, fit my Canon K2 (film), 350D, and 5Dc cameras.
2. Canon makes eyepiece diopters
3. ![Question](images/smiles/icon_question.gif) |
So...ones made for the Canon would fit the Spotmatic? _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
visualopsins
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10694 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Big Dawg wrote: |
visualopsins wrote: |
CarbonR wrote: |
fish4570 wrote: |
i'd still have mine if it had interchangeable corrective eyepieces. such a well-handling machine ...[/code] |
Such parts do exists but are quite rare, I only have one or two of them... |
1. Spotmatic viewfinder accessories, such as right-angle finder and magnifying eyepiece, fit my Canon K2 (film), 350D, and 5Dc cameras.
2. Canon makes eyepiece diopters
3. ![Question](images/smiles/icon_question.gif) |
So...ones made for the Canon would fit the Spotmatic? |
That is the question. Seems likely! I don't have any Canon accessories to try it. Surely somebody here could tell us, somebody with a Canon RA finder and a Spotmatic, for example. Anybody? _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
GrahamNR17
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
CarbonR wrote: |
fish4570 wrote: |
i'd still have mine if it had interchangeable corrective eyepieces. such a well-handling machine ...[/code] |
Such parts do exists but are quite rare, I only have one or two of them... |
1. Spotmatic viewfinder accessories, such as right-angle finder and magnifying eyepiece, fit my Canon K2 (film), 350D, and 5Dc cameras.
2. Canon makes eyepiece diopters
3. ![Question](images/smiles/icon_question.gif) |
Ooh, that's encouraging news ![Very Happy](images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif) |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
peterqd
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7447 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
GrahamNR17 wrote: |
visualopsins wrote: |
CarbonR wrote: |
fish4570 wrote: |
i'd still have mine if it had interchangeable corrective eyepieces. such a well-handling machine ...[/code] |
Such parts do exists but are quite rare, I only have one or two of them... |
1. Spotmatic viewfinder accessories, such as right-angle finder and magnifying eyepiece, fit my Canon K2 (film), 350D, and 5Dc cameras.
2. Canon makes eyepiece diopters
3. ![Question](images/smiles/icon_question.gif) |
Ooh, that's encouraging news ![Very Happy](images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif) |
I have a few, but only one is the original version for SPotmatics. The others are for the M series cameras, which have a slightly bigger eyepiece frame, so they are loose on the Spotmatic and often fall off.
Because the right ones are so hard to find, I've made several correction lenses myself, cut from a pair of old reading glasses.
http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=13568 _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Excalibur
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
GrahamNR17 wrote: |
visualopsins wrote: |
CarbonR wrote: |
fish4570 wrote: |
i'd still have mine if it had interchangeable corrective eyepieces. such a well-handling machine ...[/code] |
Such parts do exists but are quite rare, I only have one or two of them... |
1. Spotmatic viewfinder accessories, such as right-angle finder and magnifying eyepiece, fit my Canon K2 (film), 350D, and 5Dc cameras.
2. Canon makes eyepiece diopters
3. ![Question](images/smiles/icon_question.gif) |
Ooh, that's encouraging news ![Very Happy](images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif) |
I have a few, but only one is the original version for SPotmatics. The others are for the M series cameras, which have a slightly bigger eyepiece frame, so they are loose on the Spotmatic and often fall off.
Because the right ones are so hard to find, I've made several correction lenses myself, cut from a pair of old reading glasses.
http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=13568 |
Damn I keep forgetting to do this, and only the other day threw a pair away ![Rolling Eyes](images/smiles/icon_rolleyes.gif) _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
DigiChromeEd
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 29 Dec 2009 Posts: 3460 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DigiChromeEd wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
Big Dawg wrote: |
visualopsins wrote: |
CarbonR wrote: |
fish4570 wrote: |
i'd still have mine if it had interchangeable corrective eyepieces. such a well-handling machine ...[/code] |
Such parts do exists but are quite rare, I only have one or two of them... |
1. Spotmatic viewfinder accessories, such as right-angle finder and magnifying eyepiece, fit my Canon K2 (film), 350D, and 5Dc cameras.
2. Canon makes eyepiece diopters
3. ![Question](images/smiles/icon_question.gif) |
So...ones made for the Canon would fit the Spotmatic? |
That is the question. Seems likely! I don't have any Canon accessories to try it. Surely somebody here could tell us, somebody with a Canon RA finder and a Spotmatic, for example. Anybody? |
Canon eyepiece accessories are compatible. Here is my Spotmatic SP and Canon Angle Finder C.
![](http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/201112/2328_SP_1.jpg) _________________ "I've got a Nikon camera, I like to take a photograph" - Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Big Dawg
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
DigiChromeEd wrote: |
visualopsins wrote: |
Big Dawg wrote: |
visualopsins wrote: |
CarbonR wrote: |
fish4570 wrote: |
i'd still have mine if it had interchangeable corrective eyepieces. such a well-handling machine ...[/code] |
Such parts do exists but are quite rare, I only have one or two of them... |
1. Spotmatic viewfinder accessories, such as right-angle finder and magnifying eyepiece, fit my Canon K2 (film), 350D, and 5Dc cameras.
2. Canon makes eyepiece diopters
3. ![Question](images/smiles/icon_question.gif) |
So...ones made for the Canon would fit the Spotmatic? |
That is the question. Seems likely! I don't have any Canon accessories to try it. Surely somebody here could tell us, somebody with a Canon RA finder and a Spotmatic, for example. Anybody? |
Canon eyepiece accessories are compatible. Here is my Spotmatic SP and Canon Angle Finder C.
![](http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/201112/2328_SP_1.jpg) |
Thanks Edgar. Looks like that is the way to go. The Canon eyepiece won't infect my Pentax will it? _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
luisalegria
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2011 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Not the camera, but you will certainly get a dose of Canon-cooties _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
adent
![Level 2 Level 2](rating2.gif) Joined: 06 Oct 2011 Posts: 304 Location: United States
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
adent wrote:
I'd like to have one of those angle finders for my eos let alone my Spotmatic ![Smile](images/smiles/icon_smile.gif) |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
FluffPuppy
![Level 2 Level 2](rating2.gif) Joined: 11 Dec 2011 Posts: 365
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 3:41 am Post subject: Re: Pentax Spotmatic SP500 |
|
|
FluffPuppy wrote:
Big Dawg wrote: |
Very nice camera I just revieved off Ebay for $10.50 plus $9.50 shipping. Pentax wanted an entrance level SLR so they changed the SP1000 stamp on top to SP500 and changed the marking on the speed setting dial from a 1000 top shutter speed to a 500 top shutter speed. The SP1000 and the SP 500 are identical except for those 2 changes. So you can turn the SP500's shutter speed dial one click past 500 and you get 1000.
[url=http://forum.m |
Don't be so sure. I would say the shutter speed above 1/500 is probably ungoverned. It's not marked because it isn't intended to be used. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
peterqd
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7447 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Edgar, wow, that Spottie looks in great shape! Have you refurbished it? The chrome top is gleaming and the black paintwork on the base looks brand new! They really look the biz when they're clean and shiny like that. don't they? Many congratulations! _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Big Dawg
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 4:49 pm Post subject: Re: Pentax Spotmatic SP500 |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
FluffPuppy wrote: |
Big Dawg wrote: |
Very nice camera I just revieved off Ebay for $10.50 plus $9.50 shipping. Pentax wanted an entrance level SLR so they changed the SP1000 stamp on top to SP500 and changed the marking on the speed setting dial from a 1000 top shutter speed to a 500 top shutter speed. The SP1000 and the SP 500 are identical except for those 2 changes. So you can turn the SP500's shutter speed dial one click past 500 and you get 1000.
[url=http://forum.m |
Don't be so sure. I would say the shutter speed above 1/500 is probably ungoverned. It's not marked because it isn't intended to be used. |
I'll do a comparison as soon as I get my SP1000 seen about. It has a wrinkled shutter fabric. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
|