View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
danistuta
Joined: 28 Nov 2008 Posts: 81
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 1:10 pm Post subject: Pentacon 135 2.8 or Rollei Sonnar HFT 135 2.8? |
|
|
danistuta wrote:
which one is better?
thanks a lot!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
They have different character to compare them like compare apple to orange .
In generally Carl Zeiss lenses are top lenses, Pentacons are avarage lenses.
Pentacon 135mm has one of the nicest bokeh and excellent soft at wide open. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
danistuta
Joined: 28 Nov 2008 Posts: 81
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
danistuta wrote:
But Rollei is it Carl Zeiss? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
If labeled Carl Zeiss YES, otherwise not. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Attila wrote: |
If labeled Carl Zeiss YES, otherwise not. |
But there are several lenses that are not labeled Zeiss and still have the same design.
To answer your question: I would go for the Rollei. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yalcinaydin
Joined: 20 May 2008 Posts: 825 Location: Izmir, Turkey
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yalcinaydin wrote:
I owned 2 Rolleinar 2.8/135s and they are awesome lenses, Carl Zeiss must be a bit better so stop thinking and go for Rollei
Very sharp and so not suitable for portraits:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/yalcinaydin/sets/7215760750902370/
Addition:
HFT is the Rollei name for the Zeiss' *T coating and my experience says that HFTs are Rollei branded Zeiss (optics from Zeiss, manufacturing is from Rollei), their own opticts have Rolleinar brand and coating name is MC. _________________ My name is "Yalcin", and exactly "Yalçın" and here you can find my MF samples:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/yalcinaydin/sets/
Right now switching back to AF because of work needs but I still love the MF lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|