| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Dane33
Joined: 28 Dec 2012
Posts: 21
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:06 pm Post subject: Nikon History: The Nikkor 80-200mm 2.8 AIS ED |
 |
|
Dane33 wrote:
Nikkor 80-200mm 2.8 AIS ED
- world's first 2.8 telezoom.
Technical data:
Brennweite: 80mm-200mm
Max. Blendenoffnung: f/2,8
Optische Konstruktion: 15 Elemente in 11 Gruppen
Bildwinkel: 30°10'-12°20'
Distanzskala: Kalibriert in Meter und Fuß von 2,5m (8,5 ft) bis Unendlich (°°)
Distanz/Zoomeinstellung: Mit einem einzigen Einstellring;
Brennweitenmarkierungen für 80mm, 90mm, 105mm, 135mm und 200mm
Blende: f/2,8-f/32
Blendenart: Vollautomatisch
Belichtungsmessung: Bei voller Blende; Steuerkurve für Belichtungsmesser ist für AI Kameras vorgesehen und ein Blendenmitnehmer fiir andere Kameras
Stativbefestigung: Eingebauter Sockel, der um 360° drehbar ist
Frontgewinde: 95mm
Filter: 95mm einschraubbar
Objektivfassung: Nikon Bajonett
Dimensionen: Ca. 99mm Durchmesser x 223mm Länge vom Flansch; 231mm Gesamtlänge
Gewicht: Ca. 1900g
Infos:
http://www.nikonusa.com/pdf/manuals/archive/Zoom-Nikkor%20ED%2080-200mm%20f-2.8.pdf
http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/ais8228.html
http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/nikon/nikkoresources/zoomsMF/80200mm3.htm
Reviews
http://www.naturfotograf.com/lens_zoom_03.html#MF80-200f2.8
http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/tutorials/ratings.html
| Peter Braczko wrote: |
"Die Serienversion des 2.8/80-200 erschien als Schiebezoomausführung. Relativ groß und mit fast 2 kg nicht gerade leicht. Deutlich markierter Goldring als Hinweis auf die Verwendung von ED-Glas, dadurch hervorragende Schärfeleistung. Eingebautes und drehbares Stativgewinde und farbig markierte Schärfentiefeskala. Sehr teuer, hervorragend verarbeitet und unter Nikon-Fans bereits jetzt schon ein begehrter Klassiker. In verhältnismäßig kleinen Stückzahlen hergestellt ab der Seriennummer 181091."
Quelle: Peter Braczko, Das Nikon Handbuch, 1. Auflage 1990, Wittig Fachbuchverlag, Hückelhoven, S. 4-148 |
Last edited by Dane33 on Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:20 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dane33
Joined: 28 Dec 2012
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dane33 wrote:
Someone knows why my correct linked pages and pictures won't shop up? 
Ok - now they do...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dane33
Joined: 28 Dec 2012
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dane33 wrote:
Here some pictures os the actual image quality which is just stunning!!!
Sharpness wide open is perfect, great contrast and bokeh wide open, stopped down even further sharp.
Sad that the following AF-D, AF-S versions didn't achieve this quality of glass.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Posts: 1694
Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
| Dane33 wrote: |
Someone knows why my correct linked pages and pictures won't shop up?
Ok - now they do... |
anti-spam measure in first post of the new member . from now on all should work as it's supposed to
_________________
my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57849
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Wow! Very nice presentation! Congrats!
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dane33
Joined: 28 Dec 2012
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dane33 wrote:
Thanks guys, maybe someone else seeing these pictures will be ready to fall in love like I did - guess what - I got two of them 
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 8551
Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Beautiful samples of what is clearly a very superior lens. I have a newer version, which I have always regarded as one of the best, but this older version looks even better
patrickh
_________________
DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dane33
Joined: 28 Dec 2012
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dane33 wrote:
It's the result of engineers with a unlimited budget to achieve optical perfection.
And that was the reason it became so expensive that it's really rare to find today.
At that time, this was the price list: Only the 300mm 2.8 AIS ED was more expensive.
(in DM = Deutsche Mark)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Fisheyes
8mm 2.8 2069,-
16mm 2.8 969,-
Super-Weitwinkel
15mm 3.5 2449,-
18mm 3.5 1289,-
20mm 3.5 599,-
Weitwinkel
24mm 2.0 799,-
24mm 2.8 509,-
28mm 2.0 789,-
28mm 2.8 489,-
28mm 2.8 Serie E 209,-
28mm 3.5 369,-
PC 28mm 3.5 1339,-
35mm 1.4 859,-
35mm 2.0 459,-
35mm 2.5 Serie E 129,-
35mm 2.8 299,-
PC 35mm 2.8 869,-
Standard
50mm 1.2 619,-
50mm 1.4 429,-
50mm 1.8 269,-
50mm 1.8 Serie E 139,-
58mm 1.2 Noct 1819,-
Tele
85mm 1.4 1119,-
85mm 2.0 489,-
100mm 2.8 Serie E 139,-
105mm 1.8 939,-
105mm 2.5 459,-
135mm 2.0 1099,-
135mm 2.8 469,-
135mm 2.8 Serie E 199,-
135mm 3.5 349,-
180mm 2.8 ED 1149,-
200mm 2.0 ED 4279,-
200mm 4.0 519,-
Super-Tele
300mm 2.8 4699,-
300mm 4.5 799,-
300mm 4.5 IF-ED 1549,-
400mm 5.6 2659,-
500mm Reflex 949,-
Zoom
25-50mm 4.0 1139,-
28-50mm 3.5 619,-
35-70mm 3.5 1149,-
35-105mm 3.5-4.5 529,-
36-72mm 3.5 Serie E 419,-
50-135mm 3.5 929,-
50-300mm 4.5 ED 3739,-
70-210mm 4.0 Serie E 669,-
75-150mm 3.5 Serie E 429,-
80-200mm 2.8 4659,-
80-200mm 4.0 1149,-
100-300mm 5.6 749,-
Micro
55mm 2.8 399,-
105mm 2.8 869,-
105mm 4.0 749,-
200mm 4.0 1029,-
___________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dane33
Joined: 28 Dec 2012
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dane33 wrote:
| patrickh wrote: |
Beautiful samples of what is clearly a very superior lens. I have a newer version, which I have always regarded as one of the best, but this older version looks even better
patrickh |
Strange enough that few People are interested in This rare
Pierce of History!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FotoPete
Joined: 20 Nov 2012
Posts: 126
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FotoPete wrote:
That lens is a BEAST! Great pictures, very sharp and looks like the lens still holds its own without reservation! Thanks for sharing!
_________________
My Gear and Other Ramblings :: http://filmlensaddict.blogspot.ca/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bille
Joined: 03 Jan 2013
Posts: 381
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bille wrote:
At 2kg (!) more of a collectors item than anything I´d like to carry around, but the samples sure look great.
May I ask how much you paid?
Here´s more info on the lens:
http://www.naturfotograf.com/lens_zoom_03.html#MF80-200f2.8
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/80-200mm-history.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dane33
Joined: 28 Dec 2012
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dane33 wrote:
I got two Samples of this Great Lens -
One near mint - a Grand (€)
One as Good User - about 800€ (which I'm actually reselling now)
Weight only is an issue If you have the wrong camerastrap.
With my Sunsniper Steel&Bear I can Take the Lens On travels
On Holiday a Whole Day Long |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
The IQ is surprisingly excellent. Too big for me though.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dane03
Joined: 22 Dec 2014
Posts: 44
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dane03 wrote:
Upload didn't work, so I decided to put the deleted pictures to flickR
 Mundenhof _9 von 40_ by Dane, auf Flickr
 Nikkor 80-200mm 2_8 AIS ED _3 von 9_ by Dane, auf Flickr
 Europapark Rust _8 von 14_ by Dane, auf Flickr
 Europapark Rust _7 von 14_ by Dane, auf Flickr
 Europapark Rust _4 von 14_ by Dane, auf Flickr
 01_12_2012 Schauinsland nach Schneefall _98 von 98_ by Dane, auf Flickr
 01_12_2012 Schauinsland nach Schneefall _61 von 98_ by Dane, auf Flickr
 Nikon D1 _ 80-200mm 2_8 AIS ED _74 von 80_ by Dane, auf Flickr
 15_06_-17_06_12 Solothurn _17 von 208_ by Dane, auf Flickr
 15_06_-17_06_12 Solothurn _177 von 208_ by Dane, auf Flickr
 15_06_-17_06_12 Solothurn _167 von 208_ by Dane, auf Flickr
 15_06_-17_06_12 Solothurn _164 von 208_ by Dane, auf Flickr
 15_06_-17_06_12 Solothurn _150 von 208_ by Dane, auf Flickr
 15_06_-17_06_12 Solothurn _95 von 208_ by Dane, auf Flickr
 Mundenhof _40 von 40_ by Dane, auf Flickr
 Mundenhof _4 von 40_ by Dane, auf Flickr
 Mundenhof _36 von 40_ by Dane, auf Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dane03
Joined: 22 Dec 2014
Posts: 44
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dane03 wrote:
picture of this great lens:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16541
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
 I'm not a "zoom person" admittedly 
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dane03
Joined: 22 Dec 2014
Posts: 44
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dane03 wrote:
Me neither - but optically this lens seems to be on par with many fixed focal lengths.
Especially compared to its later follower 80-200 2.8 of Nikon, this lens beats them easily. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 3754
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
| Dane03 wrote: |
Me neither - but optically this lens seems to be on par with many fixed focal lengths.
Especially compared to its later follower 80-200 2.8 of Nikon, this lens beats them easily. |
The original MF lens certainly is a landmark design. Marco Cavina has some interesting details here:
http://www.marcocavina.com/articoli_fotografici/Nikkor_80-200_story/00_pag.htm
While i've seen the MF lens being sold here once, i never had the opportunity to take pictures with one.
The later first AF version however is ... quite weak, as is the AF Nikkor 2.8/35-70mm (i have both of them). The Minolta AF 2.8/80-200mm APO (1988, i think) is way better than the AF Nikkor 2.8/80-200mm ED.
Stephan
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 3214
Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
I like it!
That's a very sharp lens.
_________________
Moderator Himself |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 9097
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Amazing lens.
I have the Tamron equivalent to it -- the SP 30A with Tamron's LD glass. Tokina made one as well, using its SD glass, but it generally isn't as good as the Tamron. I'd really like to see a comparison between the Nikon and the Tamron. Anybody have both?
_________________
Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dane03
Joined: 22 Dec 2014
Posts: 44
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dane03 wrote:
I actually haD both.
While I was very amazed by the Tamron, once the Nikkor was in my hands there was no doubt that this is the better lens.
The Nikkor is able to perform very close to fixed focal length lenses, while the Tamron (to me) is a very good zoom.
There is something magical about the Nikkor 80-200mm 2.8 AIS ED. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chhayanat
Joined: 11 Apr 2016
Posts: 242
Location: The Cow Belt
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
chhayanat wrote:
| Dane03 wrote: |
Me neither - but optically this lens seems to be on par with many fixed focal lengths.
Especially compared to its later follower 80-200 2.8 of Nikon, this lens beats them easily. |
_________________
Chhayanat
Pentax-M 28/2.8; 35/2; 50/1.4; 100/2.8; 80-200/4.5; 400/5.6.
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35/2.4; Pancolar 50/1.8 (black).
Film cameras:
Zeiss Ikon Volta 135/6.3 Sonnar 9cm x 12 cm plate/sheet film;
Zeiss Ikon Ikonta 521 75/3.5 Novar (post-War) 6cm x 4.5cm
Pentax MX x 2 (black);
Digital bodies:
Pentax K200D;
Samsung GX-20; |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Posts: 3071
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
