View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
maddog10
Joined: 08 Apr 2008 Posts: 1072 Location: Maryland, USA
Expire: 2015-02-12
|
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:41 pm Post subject: Nikon F Photomic T |
|
|
maddog10 wrote:
_________________ Michael Hill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Séamuis
Joined: 20 Jul 2008 Posts: 157 Location: here & now
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Séamuis wrote:
I really like how the whole bottom comes off, like a rangefinder. I never knew that about the F. pretty cool. although that light meter looks goofy from a side view. _________________ Fish-Eye -- Fish-Eye-Takumar 1:11/18
WideAngle -- Super-Takumar 1:3.5/28, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3/35, Auto-Takumar 1:3.5/35, Super-Takumar 1:3.5/35
Normal -- S-M-C Takumar 1:1.4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:1.8/55, Super-Takumar 1:1.8/55, S-M-C Takumar 1:1.8/55, SMC Takumar 1:1.8/55, Auto-Takumar 1:2/55
TeleType -- S-M-C Takumar 1:1.8/85, S-M-C Takumar 1:2.8/105, Super-Takumar 1:3.5/135, Tele-Takumar 1:6.3/300
Zoom -- Super Takumar-Zoom 1:4.5/70~150
Macro -- Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, S-M-C Macro-Takumar 1:4/100, Bellows-Takumar 1:4/100
Medium Format -- S-M-C Takumar 6X7 1:2.8/90 LS
----------------------------------------
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Very pretty, compared to my F, but I like that mine has the simple prism
VF, so no need for batteries of any kind. Built like a tank, isn't it.
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
maddog10
Joined: 08 Apr 2008 Posts: 1072 Location: Maryland, USA
Expire: 2015-02-12
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
maddog10 wrote:
You can do odd jobs around the house with this camera! I am still looking for a decent F with plain prism (at a reasonable price). _________________ Michael Hill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Séamuis
Joined: 20 Jul 2008 Posts: 157 Location: here & now
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Séamuis wrote:
I tell you what though, it exudes 'professional' and looks damn rugged. it just gives the feeling of a precision tool. if I wasn't so enamored with Pentax and actually had some nikon lenses to use with it I wouldn't mind owning one of these. _________________ Fish-Eye -- Fish-Eye-Takumar 1:11/18
WideAngle -- Super-Takumar 1:3.5/28, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3/35, Auto-Takumar 1:3.5/35, Super-Takumar 1:3.5/35
Normal -- S-M-C Takumar 1:1.4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:1.8/55, Super-Takumar 1:1.8/55, S-M-C Takumar 1:1.8/55, SMC Takumar 1:1.8/55, Auto-Takumar 1:2/55
TeleType -- S-M-C Takumar 1:1.8/85, S-M-C Takumar 1:2.8/105, Super-Takumar 1:3.5/135, Tele-Takumar 1:6.3/300
Zoom -- Super Takumar-Zoom 1:4.5/70~150
Macro -- Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, S-M-C Macro-Takumar 1:4/100, Bellows-Takumar 1:4/100
Medium Format -- S-M-C Takumar 6X7 1:2.8/90 LS
----------------------------------------
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
I spent far too much time as a teenager staring at these in used camera stores in Manila. I'm spending far too much time staring at yours, come to think of it. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rbsinto
Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 57 Location: Thornhill (a suburb of Toronto), Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
rbsinto wrote:
Michael,
Am I missing something?
You've posted a series of photographs of a Nikon F with a Photomic T finder, that looks just like all the other Nikon F's with Photomic T finders. Other than the fact that it is yours, and has a unique serial number, is there something rare or unusual about this camera that explains why you've shown it here? (Yes, I know this is the Show Your Gear Forum, but I don't understand the concept.)
I also shoot with old Nikons: S3 rangefinders, f, F2 and FA, but have never bothered to take photos of them and post them on the internet mainly because first, I assume mine look pretty much the same as everyone else's, so those who care have probably already seen one, and second, because collecting equipment is the easiest part of photography. All it takes is money, so I don't consider it to be significant or wonderful to own this or that piece of gear. Personally, I'd much rather see the results of what you did with them as opposed to the cameras themselves. _________________ I shoot with film. That's film. F....i....l....m. You remember film. It was in all the papers. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Why do this ?
1. This is a bit like a store window, or a glass case, where us pathetic types can stare wistfully, or enviously as the case may be.
2. A LOT of people have no idea what a Nikon Photomic is, have never seen one, and have no idea how cool this old stuff is. We old farts who have been around this stuff for the last forty-fifty years, we do know, but we have a constant stream of people in their 20's and 30's -or younger - who have no idea.
3. Its really very pretty, a work of art in itself. Fine, it was made in a factory, and not by any of us, and not by an "artist". But its art anyway, and this is like a gallery exhibition. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
I have seen lots of Photomoics, mostly staring wistfully at them in stores like luis alegra.
But, I LOVE seeing the equipment showcased here on this appropriate Equipment Gallery section! _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rob Leslie
Joined: 20 Mar 2007 Posts: 1103 Location: UK Swindon
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rob Leslie wrote:
rbsinto wrote: |
Michael,
Am I missing something?
You've posted a series of photographs of a Nikon F with a Photomic T finder, that looks just like all the other Nikon F's with Photomic T finders. Other than the fact that it is yours, and has a unique serial number, is there something rare or unusual about this camera that explains why you've shown it here? (Yes, I know this is the Show Your Gear Forum, but I don't understand the concept.)
I also shoot with old Nikons: S3 rangefinders, f, F2 and FA, but have never bothered to take photos of them and post them on the internet mainly because first, I assume mine look pretty much the same as everyone else's, so those who care have probably already seen one, and second, because collecting equipment is the easiest part of photography. All it takes is money, so I don't consider it to be significant or wonderful to own this or that piece of gear. Personally, I'd much rather see the results of what you did with them as opposed to the cameras themselves. |
With many here it is all about collecting this equipment not taking photos, except a few test shots of the cat or dog.
‘I have 4 of these and have not shot a single one, yet!
I bought them as collectibles,’
Each to their own and it is certainly a better hobby than some. But I do agree it would be nice to see good creative photos posted. IMO it is a shame to see such good tools unused.
Maybe the Equipment Gallery should only be for equipment that has been used by the owner and some of their work (With the piece) shown, or else just post a pic of your display cab! _________________ Pentax K10D & K100D. Many Tamron Adaptall SP lenses, Fujinon f4.5 400mm. A loved Lens Baby 2, Lubitel triplet +++ and many film cameras. Mainly a Digital user inc G5, GR2
http://robstreet.blogspot.com/
http://robleslie.blogspot.com/
http://roblesliephotography.blogspot.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/64956578@N00/
Last edited by Rob Leslie on Sun Oct 05, 2008 9:38 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChrisLilley
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 1767 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
ChrisLilley wrote:
rbsinto wrote: |
Michael,
Am I missing something? |
Evidently.
rbsinto wrote: |
You've posted a series of photographs of a Nikon F with a Photomic T finder, that looks just like all the other Nikon F's with Photomic T finders. |
It would be surprising if it looked like, say, a Canon 40D, wouldn't it.
rbsinto wrote: |
Other than the fact that it is yours, and has a unique serial number, is there something rare or unusual about this camera that explains why you've shown it here? |
Because its the Equipment Gallery where, you know, people show photos of their equipment. It doesn't have to be rare (although an original F is not exactly common nowadays) or unusual, or 'significant' or 'wonderful' or any other constraints that you seem to imagine are required to post here.
rbsinto wrote: |
(Yes, I know this is the Show Your Gear Forum, but I don't understand the concept.) |
I'm glad you recognise the problem, at least.
rbsinto wrote: |
I also shoot with old Nikons: S3 rangefinders, f, F2 and FA, but have never bothered to take photos of them and post them on the internet mainly because first, I assume mine look pretty much the same as everyone else's, |
Ever consider that 'everyone else' doesn't necessarily have the same cameras you do?
rbsinto wrote: |
so those who care have probably already seen one, and second, because collecting equipment is the easiest part of photography. All it takes is money, so I don't consider it to be significant or wonderful to own this or that piece of gear. Personally, I'd much rather see the results of what you did with them as opposed to the cameras themselves. |
That would be a fair comment - if this was the only section of mf lenses. Since there are other sections for posting 'the results' as you put it (Gallery, for example) then your point is wide of the mark. _________________ Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ai'ed, AiS
Camera: Nikon D90, D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 K, AI'ed | N.K. Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor-N.C 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | ЛЗОС (LZOS) Юпитер-9 (Jupiter-9) 85mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 90mm f/3.5 SL | Nikkor-P 105mm f/2.5 pre-Ai, Ai'ed | Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 | Schneider Kreuznach Componon 105mm f/5.6 | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 ED AiS | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChrisLilley
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 1767 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
ChrisLilley wrote:
Michael, thanks for these. I for one enjoyed seeing them. Yes, I have seen photos of this camera before (eg in Stafford's book) but these are nice, clear images that show the camera well from a variety of viewpoints. _________________ Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ai'ed, AiS
Camera: Nikon D90, D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 K, AI'ed | N.K. Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor-N.C 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | ЛЗОС (LZOS) Юпитер-9 (Jupiter-9) 85mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 90mm f/3.5 SL | Nikkor-P 105mm f/2.5 pre-Ai, Ai'ed | Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 | Schneider Kreuznach Componon 105mm f/5.6 | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 ED AiS | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Keep going your good work Michael! I ask other members too to publish their equipment here. This is a great on-line photo shop. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
maddog10
Joined: 08 Apr 2008 Posts: 1072 Location: Maryland, USA
Expire: 2015-02-12
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
maddog10 wrote:
Why do I do it?
1. The photos are all taken as records for my insurance company. They are not outstanding quality, but the best I can manage with my little tabletop studio (and my still growing skills).
2. If you do a search on the Internet for a particular camera, perhaps in time they will point to this great website.
3. I hoped to 'convince' others to do the same, I would like to see other cameras.
4. Of course part is ego, I want to show off. None of the cameras I own are museum quality, they are all users.
When I first bought some of these cameras, I bought them as collectibles only. Now (largely because of this Forum) I intend to at least test EVERY camera and lens I own. I have some that are not functional and I am going to try and repair them (after a bit more research). Still have lots more equipment to show. Don't get tired of taking photos, but the processing gets a bit tedious.
As with every post on this forum, it is not for everyone. _________________ Michael Hill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|