View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 1:10 pm Post subject: Newer lens coating or haze? (UC Hexanon 28/1.8) |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
I have two copies of the Konica UC Hexanon 28/1.8
Lens #1 (to the left) has a slightly lower serial number than lens #2 (to the right). The glass on lens #1 is somehow clearer, the black metal parts inside the lens are blacker giving the impression that there is no glass between the eye and the metal. Lens #2 either has more coating or then something else is going on. Could it be haze or separation orhas Konica simply added more/newer coating on the slightly newer lens.
I have looked at 100% crops from both lenses and I can tell no difference in clarity or sharpness.
The bulbous inner element of lens #2 has a more purple coating, lens #1 is more blue/green (lens #2 to the left). The situation is the opposite when it comes to the outermost glass surface.
Lens #2 seems to be more reflective.
_________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015)
Last edited by Pontus on Thu Aug 20, 2015 1:37 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vlousada
Joined: 11 Dec 2010 Posts: 345 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vlousada wrote:
WoW! Two copies of such an high regarded lens :envy
- You just could send the "worst" one to me ans that is OK
Seriously, nothing against having the best (i.e. mint/EX++) copies of lenses but lens with some so-called "haze" may be as good too.
Of course resale VALUE is another story, but as IQ of produced photos the difference may be minimal or not visible at all. _________________ Regards,
VITOR
-------
SELLING:
Please ask
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
newst
Joined: 21 Oct 2014 Posts: 617 Location: Troy, MI USA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
newst wrote:
vlousada wrote: |
WoW! Two copies of such an high regarded lens :envy
- You just could send the "worst" one to me ans that is OK
Seriously, nothing against having the best (i.e. mint/EX++) copies of lenses but lens with some so-called "haze" may be as good too.
Of course resale VALUE is another story, but as IQ of produced photos the difference may be minimal or not visible at all. |
Naw, don't send it to him, he'd just waste it. Now I however...
I sincerely doubt that the variance you see has any relation to separation or any other flaw. If I had to guess I would think that both lenses received the same coating. Some slight difference in the batches of glass, the coating mix, or even the environment the different lenses have been exposed to seem more likely causes for the difference in coloring. _________________ Steve
Just an armadillo on the shoulder of the information superhighway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10786 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Flipped lens elements? Or?,
Sounds as if there are two coatings, they wanted to try coating surfaces in different sequential order. Coatings have different index of refraction, however. I.e., changing the coatings only could cause minor inaccuracies within the whole lens, which effects could cancel by the time light gets all the way through the lens. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010 Posts: 1300 Location: Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
What happens when you shine a bright inspection light through them? _________________ Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
Definitely not flipped lens elements. I have tested both lenses both at mfd and at infinity and I can't tell the results apart when pixel peeping.
When I shine a light through the lenses, both are very clear and free of dust. Can't see anything wrong.
It's just that one lens seems to have more reflective green coating making the lens look less transparent when looking at the lens inners and aperture mechanism from the front (under natural light). _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
Sounds as if there are two coatings, they wanted to try coating surfaces in different sequential order. Coatings have different index of refraction, however. I.e., changing the coatings only could cause minor inaccuracies within the whole lens, which effects could cancel by the time light gets all the way through the lens. |
This could be the case. Both lenses seem to have greenish and purple coatings. Lets say that Konica has experimented and that the different coatings are on different elements on my two lenses. If one of the coatings (the green) is more reflective it could mean that the lens with the greenish coating on the outer element would seem less transparent... Maybe. _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vlousada
Joined: 11 Dec 2010 Posts: 345 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vlousada wrote:
What about light transmission?
The metering is identical? _________________ Regards,
VITOR
-------
SELLING:
Please ask
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
Yes, I can see no difference. _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WNG555
Joined: 18 Dec 2014 Posts: 784 Location: Arrid-Zone-A, USA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WNG555 wrote:
If Konica was revising the sequence of coating layers, or transferred the reflective coating to the exterior, perhaps it was done to reduce internal reflections. That later lens is reflective as viewed from the front. Thus some light transmission is loss. But if that coating was beneath, perhaps it was reflecting more internally.
Just a hunch, try pointing both lenses at the Sun and see if they both flare the same way. _________________ "The eyes are useless when the mind is blind."
Sony ILCE-6000, SELP1650, SEL1855, SEL55210, SEL5018. Sigma 19/30/60mm f2.8 EX DN Art.
Rokinon 8mm f3.5 Fish-Eye, 14mm f2.8 IF ED UMC. Samyang 12mm f2.8 ED AS NCS Fish-Eye.
And a bunch of Manual-Focus Lenses
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16591 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Pontus wrote: |
Yes, I can see no difference. |
an excellent coating today brings reflections per surface down to less than 0.5%. Even if it would be somewhat different, the difference in stops is negligible.
I however measure that with a special spectrometric setup, then once would see it and on a 300-850nm scale _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1659
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
It seems to be an inconsistency in coated process, or a change in the coated itself from a lens to the other.
I believe when we find only one of that two lenses, any of them, nothing will call our attention. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|