View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
StillSanj
Joined: 21 Apr 2015 Posts: 412 Location: United States
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2016 11:29 pm Post subject: New autofocus adapter for manual lenses...game changer? |
|
|
StillSanj wrote:
Hey guys.
I just found out about this adapter.
It is supposed to be an AF adapter for MF lenses. I have no idea how that would work.
http://techartpro.com/product/techart-pro-leica-m-sony-e-autofocus-adapter/
Interesting how you can buy additional add-ons for different mounts, so after initially investment, $70 per adapter isn't terrible if they are very well made and have AF.
Seems like maybe a good way to get high quality, inclusive of all mounts with AF to boot? $370+ is not cheap though...
Is anyone familiar with this? Any thoughts on pros or cons? Would anyone consider this?
Is this a big deal? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1054 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 12:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
It is discussed in this thread already:
http://forum.mflenses.com/techart-leica-m-to-sony-e-af-adapter-in-development-new-t73879.html
It is tempting.
But it only has ~0,5cm of z-shift focusing (because of LM short flange distance) and it focuses with a noisy stepping motor - this are its weak points for me, so far.
I'm considering buying it but I'll wait for some trustworthy independent reviews first. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 4:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
I have update the original thread with some more info. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 3:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
"game changer?"
Not for me, still a manual focus junky. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TrueLoveOne
Joined: 30 Sep 2012 Posts: 1840 Location: Netherlands
Expire: 2013-12-24
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
TrueLoveOne wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
"game changer?"
Not for me, still a manual focus junky. |
+1, game spoiler for me... if i want AF i'll take the 5D with L lenses. _________________ My Flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/chantalrene/
Sony A7, Canon 5D mkII, Minolta 7D + RD3000 and some more.....
Minolta and Konica collector.... slowly selling all the other stuff! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tromboads
Joined: 29 May 2012 Posts: 1782 Location: Melbourne AU
Expire: 2015-10-01
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
tromboads wrote:
Pretty much. What's so hard about manually focusing |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
tromboads wrote: |
Pretty much. What's so hard about manually focusing |
Yep. It is the road to fun and total control.
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
"AF is for loosers", sorry, just couldn't resist as I'm a rather addicted mf'ler
and being able to quickly focus about anything after years of practice. BUT
for moving objects, cats, people etc. it certainly has its use for sure!!
The short focusing distance, "Z-axis" as Dan calls it, is a major drawback
as many lenses I have, have a massive focusing distamce, especially for
my close-up / macro use, so won't help there anyway. And I doubt it could
handle some 2000++ grams of lens, too _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Antoine
Joined: 08 Jan 2016 Posts: 298 Location: London
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Antoine wrote:
Could be useful when wife is impatient and/or for other events. But I doubt they will issue one for Minolta MDs before long... _________________ Antoine
Sony A6000 APS-C and Sony A7 Rii
Minolta Fisheye MD Rokkor 7.5 mm f4, Fisheye MD 16 f2.8 MD R 17mm f4, MD R 20mm f2.8, MC VFC & MDIII 24mm f2.8, MD 28mm f2.0 &3.5, MD II 35mm 1.8, MD 45mm f2.0, MD 50mm f 1.2 & MD I f1.4, MC PG 58mm 1.2, MD 85mm f2.0, MD R 85mm f2.8 Varisoft, MC 85mm f1.7 MD R 100mm f2.5, MD R 100mm f4.0 macro, MD III 135mm f2.8, MD R 200mm f2.8 & 4.0, RF 250mm f5.6, MD 300mm f4.5, MD APO 400 mm f5.6, RF 500mm f8.0, RF 800mm f8.0 *2 300-s and 300-l
100 mm f4 macro bellows (5/4)
Vivitar 17mm f3.5, Elicar 300mm mirror f5.6, Zhongi turbo ii
Sigma 16mm f 2.8 fish eye
Zooms:24-50 mm f4, 35-70 mm f3.5 macro, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5, 50-135 f 3.5, 70-210 f4 and MD APO 100-500 mm f8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StillSanj
Joined: 21 Apr 2015 Posts: 412 Location: United States
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
StillSanj wrote:
Thanks guys for the input, and sorry to rehash something that you guys apparently knew!
I feel the same way, there's a reason I use vintage lenses. Not just the difference in optical quality, but the manual focusing capabilities.
I think it might have a good certain use for specific purposes, such as doing "sports" photography with vintage glass for whatever reason, but I also don't see need for it myself.
I wonder if it'll somehow increase the demand for vintage glass, or if most true vintage glass users don't care for AF like the gang here. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Antoine
Joined: 08 Jan 2016 Posts: 298 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2016 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Antoine wrote:
It certainly appears to lead to compact AF camera + lens. _________________ Antoine
Sony A6000 APS-C and Sony A7 Rii
Minolta Fisheye MD Rokkor 7.5 mm f4, Fisheye MD 16 f2.8 MD R 17mm f4, MD R 20mm f2.8, MC VFC & MDIII 24mm f2.8, MD 28mm f2.0 &3.5, MD II 35mm 1.8, MD 45mm f2.0, MD 50mm f 1.2 & MD I f1.4, MC PG 58mm 1.2, MD 85mm f2.0, MD R 85mm f2.8 Varisoft, MC 85mm f1.7 MD R 100mm f2.5, MD R 100mm f4.0 macro, MD III 135mm f2.8, MD R 200mm f2.8 & 4.0, RF 250mm f5.6, MD 300mm f4.5, MD APO 400 mm f5.6, RF 500mm f8.0, RF 800mm f8.0 *2 300-s and 300-l
100 mm f4 macro bellows (5/4)
Vivitar 17mm f3.5, Elicar 300mm mirror f5.6, Zhongi turbo ii
Sigma 16mm f 2.8 fish eye
Zooms:24-50 mm f4, 35-70 mm f3.5 macro, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5, 50-135 f 3.5, 70-210 f4 and MD APO 100-500 mm f8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Basilisk
Joined: 21 Mar 2013 Posts: 356 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2016 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Basilisk wrote:
On lenses with longer travel, it is probably best to think of it as a focus "fine tune", as you will probably need to do a rough manual focus first.
I wouldn't spend a fortune on it, but it would be interesting to try. I doubt it is going to be fast enough for action, which is where I most appreciate good AF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Abbazz
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 1098 Location: Jakarta
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 3:36 am Post subject: Re: New autofocus adapter for manual lenses...game changer? |
|
|
Abbazz wrote:
It's not really a "game changer", as Pentax has been selling for years an adapter providing autofocus capability for Pentax K or M42 manual focus lenses (the SMC Pentax-F 1.7x AF Adapter). I seem to remember Nikon also offered a similar device at some point.
Cheers!
Abbazz _________________ Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment decisif, et le chef-d'oeuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaitre et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz
The 6x9 Photography Online Resource:
http://artbig.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roka
Joined: 18 Mar 2016 Posts: 133 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Expire: 2017-04-07
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 4:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Roka wrote:
Interesting piece of technology but I won't be buying one. Like most of you I'm not interested in AF - I'll stick with MF.
I can see this as a negative though. If it gains traction eventually people will figure out that legacy glass is more affordable than the new stuff. And as more people start buying it the prices will only go up. Guess I better start stocking up now. _________________
Camera
Fujifilm X-T20
Lenses
Vivitar 55mm f/2.8 Macro (1:1)
Canon FD 200mm f/4
Canon FD 300mm f/5.6
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 5:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
I ordered one for quite a while ago now, most out of curiousity. The delivery is very slow at the moment and you must wait for several months the get your copy, only this will make it easy to sell without loss if it is nothing or you... _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
buerokratiehasser
Joined: 12 Jun 2011 Posts: 470
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
buerokratiehasser wrote:
The game change is focus confirm, whether by chip adaptor or nonmoronic camera firmware.
I may be totally mistaken but all "af" buys you would be the ability to shoot while jumping and rolling. Well probably it is too slow for that. When you have to move the whole lens or camera things will not work as well as real AF.
You may stretch on your toes and get five foot closer to some gizmo you cannot get to. Sometimes an advantage.
When I heard about a similar system (moving the plate/lens) I thought it was a pretty ingenious, if somewhat obvious, idea, though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PhantomLord
Joined: 08 Apr 2013 Posts: 476 Location: Szczecin, Poland
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PhantomLord wrote:
Come on! It would spoil whole point of having manual focus lenses .
I agree that AF has it's use on some occasions, but I still prefer MF with proper metal lens. I was shooting 2,5 year old in the park (daughter of friend) and she was blazingly fast (as the kids just are) and AF just wasn't fast enough. What's more I cannot frame photo everyway I want because I had to stick to focus points of AF. Well after 5-10 minutes of strugling I got out my manual 135mm/2.5 and it was a lot easier to nail the focus even at f/2.5-f/4.
I know, that more expensive cameras and more expensive lenses do AF a lot lot better than my Canon 600d with Tamron SP 17-50/2.8, but still it's not completely rubbish combo.
On the other hand I must admit, that having such mf->af adapter will give me opportunity to be actually in focus on the photo somebody else is taking with my camera . From some time now I do f/8-f/11 and pre focus usually on hyperfocal to ensure I'll be 'sharp' when somebody else is taking the photo. _________________ Mateusz
No good story ever starts with drinking tea.
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mateuszmolik/sets/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Antoine
Joined: 08 Jan 2016 Posts: 298 Location: London
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2016 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Antoine wrote:
Actually, an added benefit is that if you manually focus on min distance, the AF adapter will allow you to take pictures at closer distances as it can extend by a further 5 mm. Not much for tele, but quite a bit for wide angle and even 50mm...
Of course, it is only compatible with A7ii, A7Rii and A6300 and only for Leica M lenses...so not for me but I am confident there will be more of these plus in a couple of years, most probably, some MD rokkor ones and compatible with new cameras. _________________ Antoine
Sony A6000 APS-C and Sony A7 Rii
Minolta Fisheye MD Rokkor 7.5 mm f4, Fisheye MD 16 f2.8 MD R 17mm f4, MD R 20mm f2.8, MC VFC & MDIII 24mm f2.8, MD 28mm f2.0 &3.5, MD II 35mm 1.8, MD 45mm f2.0, MD 50mm f 1.2 & MD I f1.4, MC PG 58mm 1.2, MD 85mm f2.0, MD R 85mm f2.8 Varisoft, MC 85mm f1.7 MD R 100mm f2.5, MD R 100mm f4.0 macro, MD III 135mm f2.8, MD R 200mm f2.8 & 4.0, RF 250mm f5.6, MD 300mm f4.5, MD APO 400 mm f5.6, RF 500mm f8.0, RF 800mm f8.0 *2 300-s and 300-l
100 mm f4 macro bellows (5/4)
Vivitar 17mm f3.5, Elicar 300mm mirror f5.6, Zhongi turbo ii
Sigma 16mm f 2.8 fish eye
Zooms:24-50 mm f4, 35-70 mm f3.5 macro, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5, 50-135 f 3.5, 70-210 f4 and MD APO 100-500 mm f8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Basilisk
Joined: 21 Mar 2013 Posts: 356 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2016 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Basilisk wrote:
Antoine wrote: |
Actually, an added benefit is that if you manually focus on min distance, the AF adapter will allow you to take pictures at closer distances as it can extend by a further 5 mm. Not much for tele, but quite a bit for wide angle and even 50mm...
Of course, it is only compatible with A7ii, A7Rii and A6300 and only for Leica M lenses...so not for me but I am confident there will be more of these plus in a couple of years, most probably, some MD rokkor ones and compatible with new cameras. |
Your first point is a good one.
I think the adoption of an M mount should open up pretty much any manual SLR lens as an option, with a relatively cheap M mount adaptor? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2016 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
Yep, I bought a M to m42 as well, so I can try my slr lenses _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013 Posts: 393 Location: Bremen, Germany
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2016 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
Basilisk wrote: |
I think the adoption of an M mount should open up pretty much any manual SLR lens as an option, with a relatively cheap M mount adaptor? |
Yes, but the M-mounts short flange distance limits the amount of Z-shift so you'll have to roughtly prefocus many SLR lenses. An SLR mount version would allow for more Z-shift but there is no obvious SLR mount that would allow for adapters to all the common mounts:
40.50mm - Konica F & AR
42.00mm - Canon FL & FD
43.50mm - Minolta SR & Fujica X
44.00mm - Canon EF & Praktika B
44.50mm - Sony/Minolta A & Rollei/Voigtländer QBM
45.46mm - Pentax K, M42
45.50mm - Contax C/Y & Mamiya Z
46.00mm - Olymous OM
46.50mm - Nikon F
47.00mm - Leica R
A new mount with 35-38mm flange distance would be ideal but we might need to wait quite a while for cheep 3rd party adapters... _________________ Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
meanwhile
Joined: 29 May 2014 Posts: 225 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-11-28
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2016 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
meanwhile wrote:
Boris_Akunin wrote: |
Yes, but the M-mounts short flange distance limits the amount of Z-shift so you'll have to roughtly prefocus many SLR lenses. |
This for me is the point of this adaptor, and that is exactly how I plan on using it when I get one. It's not to replace MF with AF, it's simply to enhance it, refine it and help get critical focus. You still have the manual focus workflow and sensibility, just a little helping hand at the end to hit focus just right. _________________ In my bag: Sony A7II - Olympus OM 21mm f/3.5 - Minolta M-Rokkor 40mm f/2.0 - Konica Hexanon 57mm f/1.2 AR - Olympus Zuiko OM 100mm f/2.8 - Pentax 135mm f/3.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|