View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:39 pm Post subject: Minolta 3.5-4.5/35-105 on Sony a850 |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
#13
#14
#15
#16
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DigiChromeEd
Joined: 29 Dec 2009 Posts: 3462 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2014 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DigiChromeEd wrote:
Great results Ian, it looks like a very capable lens.
I bought the Minolta AF 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 c/w Minolta 505si Super on your recommendation as my walkabout film camera and it makes a superb combination - the lens is first class. The complete kit cost me £40 in near mint condition! _________________ "I've got a Nikon camera, I like to take a photograph" - Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eddieitman
Joined: 12 Apr 2011 Posts: 1247 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2014 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eddieitman wrote:
the 35-105 is a stunning lens and these results display that _________________ My web site www.digital-darkroom.weebly.com
Life is like a camera. Focus on what's important, capture the good times, develop from the negatives and if things don't work out, just take another shot. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10471 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2014 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
+1 great series, #3 is my favorite ! _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2014 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Cheers fellas.
I couldn't pick a favourite between the 28-85 and 35-105, they are different lenses in many ways but equally good. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
skida
Joined: 02 Mar 2012 Posts: 1826 Location: North East England
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2014 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
skida wrote:
That lens loves the light we have been enjoying. Great stuff. _________________ Lots of 35mm Film Cameras
Lots of Lenses
New Vlog on Youtube called "The Olduns Shot"
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBHCOHaIrcYr7s3is1EcqxQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
clockwork247
Joined: 23 Dec 2010 Posts: 79
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2014 3:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
clockwork247 wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Cheers fellas.
I couldn't pick a favourite between the 28-85 and 35-105, they are different lenses in many ways but equally good. |
the 35-105 is better. any lens that starts at 35-xx is always good, probably because they're easier to make. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2014 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
But that's just it, the 28-85 matches the 35-105 in all regards, it might even be sightly superior in microcontrast. The 35-105 is slightly better in it's macro performance because the macro setting is at the 105 end and with the 28-85 the macro is at the 28mm end; conversely, the 28-85 focuses faster with much less hunting. So as I say, they are equally good but have different characteristics. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
clockwork247
Joined: 23 Dec 2010 Posts: 79
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2014 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
clockwork247 wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
But that's just it, the 28-85 matches the 35-105 in all regards, it might even be sightly superior in microcontrast. The 35-105 is slightly better in it's macro performance because the macro setting is at the 105 end and with the 28-85 the macro is at the 28mm end; conversely, the 28-85 focuses faster with much less hunting. So as I say, they are equally good but have different characteristics. |
I'm an alpha shooter, the rating on the original 35-105 is higher than the 28-85 on dyxum board, and I would have to agree.
I own a lot of minolta/alpha lens, the 35-105 is a wicked lens, on par with some of the pro zooms (f/2.8 ), and even better than old sigma/tamron f/2.8 zoom at similar aperture. The only issue is MDF is really really bad... better than the 28-85, better than the 24-85, it's close to my 18-135, and the sony 18-135 is a very good lens.
http://www.dyxum.com/reviews/lenses/minolta-af-35-105-f3.5-4.5_review44.html
http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/Minolta-AF-28-85-F3.5-4.5_lens91.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2014 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I can only speak for the copies I own, but my 28-85 matches my 35-105 and I couldn't chose between them in IQ terms, on colour film, I think I slightly prefer the 28-85, it has just a little more pop.
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|