| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nainsurvolte
Joined: 20 Dec 2013 Posts: 17 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 2:07 pm Post subject: Lost the aperture ball bearing, how to found out its size? |
|
|
nainsurvolte wrote:
Yes I was not careful when re installing the back of my Vivitar 28mm f2 and loss the aperture steel ball.
My question is, How can I know what size is that ball? I already know where I can get them given that the size can be purchased. I also already know also that 1 mm is not good. I purchased some and they get through the spring.
Now I did a non scientific measurement with small Hex screwdriver. The 1.5 mm seem to fit in the hole where the spring is while the 1.75 does not. Could that mean the 1.5 mm is the one
For reference, the one I own is the K11 listed on this page (or possibly the K13 looking at the serial number range)
http://photografica.robinparmar.com/vivitar28detail.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lloydy
 Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7768 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I think your 'non scientific' method is actually very practical, and probably very accurate. But remember that the 1.5mm measurement of the hex driver will be across the flats and not the points. If you've got a caliper measure the across points measurement, or do the trignometary.  _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nainsurvolte
Joined: 20 Dec 2013 Posts: 17 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nainsurvolte wrote:
Actually that is why I asked the question. Made me realize I had it all wrong... I assumed the dimension was point to point...
Thanks for correcting me.
It means that I need a 1.75mm steel ball.
Hexagon= 6 equilateral triangles. Doing some geometry by splitting the triangle in 2, you manage to have a triangle with a 90deg angle... and you find
R= .75/(cos(30)) = 1.73
Just a verification, the 1.75 Hex would give a 2mm. I never saw steel balls between 1.75 and 2mm. So up we go with the order. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lloydy
 Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7768 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I just measured a 1.5 hex wrench across the points and got 1.63mm. I'd be tempted to go with a 1.5mm ball. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
philslizzy
 Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4749 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
| nainsurvolte wrote: |
Actually that is why I asked the question. Made me realize I had it all wrong... I.
Hexagon= 6 equilateral triangles. Doing some geometry by splitting the triangle in 2, you manage to have a triangle with a 90deg angle... and you find
R= .75/(cos(30)) = 1.73
Just a verification, the 1.75 Hex would give a 2mm. I never saw steel balls between 1.75 and 2mm. So up we go with the order. |
WTF! thats total nonsense to me. where's Pythagoras when you need him?
I've just always used a ball from another lens. If iit seems to fit it will do the job.
Someone said here (I'm paraphrasing a bit) that an engineer would reduce it by so many thou (0.00's of a mm) and a non engineer would sand it a bit till it fits. I just try it and if it does the job that good. _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nainsurvolte
Joined: 20 Dec 2013 Posts: 17 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2013 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nainsurvolte wrote:
Guilty as charge, I am an engineer,
But at the same time, taking a ball from another lens has been my first attempts. I can tell you the one from my Pentacon 50mm 1.8 is way too big and that there are no ball for the aperture in an old Nikkor 135 f2.8 pre-AI (also the reason why it is in pieces on my desk). For the rest of the lens I have, I don`t want to dismantle them. Micro tools via ebay can send 3-5 ball for 5$. Given the size of that ball I thought it was small as hell compare to the Pentacon and thus ordered 1mm ( I have a stock if people are looking for some )
@Lloydy,
Possible the 1.5 is a better choice, in these days, it was possibly easier to aim for 1.5mm ball +/- rather than 1.75 +/-... I may just play safe and order both and spare the S&H for 2 orders. If the 1.75 fits, it might make a tighter click than with the 1.5. Although the other Kiron lens I have are more of a subtle type of click.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|