Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Lens blade count index - M42/M39
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 1:07 pm    Post subject: Lens blade count index - M42/M39 Reply with quote

Does anyone know where I could find a lens index by blade count or vice versa?


PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi, Bob! Welcome and enjoy your stay.
I'd like to tune in to your question. Such a list would be nice to have...


PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Welcome! I never seen this kind of list.


PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Welcome Bob
That would be interesting.
Honestly though after 10 or 12 blades the iris is round enough.
Maybe I am wrong but more should not improve highlights and could be more of an issue if in need of maintainnce.
I think the Tair 11a I got from Richard has 20blades Shocked


PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Bob,

nice to see you here, too. Welcome!

Nice idea with that list, reminds me of my beginnings about the macro lens database - I finally had to do it myself....BIGGRIN!

Cheers,


PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

more than 10 (as I remember):

TAIR 11a: 20 blades
Biotar T 5.8cm/2: 17 blades
Jupiter-9: 15 blades
Meyer Trioplan V 100/2.8: 15 blades
Meyer Orestor (preset Pentacon) V 135/2.8: 15 blades
Meyer Telemegor V 180/5.5: 15 blades
Meyer Orestegor V 200/4: 15 blades
KMZ Helios 44 58/2 (old version): 13 blades
Meyer Telefogar V 90/3.5: 12 blades
Biotar T 58/2: 12 blades


PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well there is always this site: http://m42.artlimited.net/site_lenses.php If everyone tried to fill in the lists it might be a better resource. You just need editor access...doesn't seem like to hard a process though

~Marc


PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 1:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

themoleman342 wrote:
Well there is always this site: http://m42.artlimited.net/site_lenses.php If everyone tried to fill in the lists it might be a better resource. You just need editor access...doesn't seem like to hard a process though

~Marc


thank you marc!... nice list!..


PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 1:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kds315* wrote:
Hi Bob,

nice to see you here, too. Welcome!

Nice idea with that list, reminds me of my beginnings about the macro lens database - I finally had to do it myself....BIGGRIN!

Cheers,


Good to see you as well Klaus!.. i am working my way to UV!!.. but stopping off for a little bellows work in the mean time.. just picked up a Bellows-Nikkor-Q 13.5cm f/4 - 15 blades!!


PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 1:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thank you for the welcome everyone!..

thank you No-X for the list!


PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 1:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am just looking your Pbase Gallery. Congrats for you beautiful work! I love so much your frog shoots! I wish to have some similar nice frog portraits!


PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 2:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm pretty sure my Novoflexars (300/5.6 and 400/5.6) have 24 blade apertures. They're at home and I'm in Las Vegas for the Nellis Airshow, otherwise I'd go look.


PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 4:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thank you attila!

i have most of my latest macros at the bottom of flowers/assorted flowers/

using the Bellows-Nikkor-Q 13.5cm f/4

for example a shot of Baby's Breath (Gypsophilia)



PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 6:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

welcome Bob
superb pbase gallery!
have a nice time with us


PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 7:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

F16SUNSHINE wrote:

Honestly though after 10 or 12 blades the iris is round enough.


I agree. And it's not always about the number of blades. Volna-9 has only six blades but they are shaped to make perfecty round aperture at f/16.


PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 1:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Riku-- of course i agree... must be curved.. i have not seen curved blades on a 35mm lens yet..

after note: duh!.. of course i have seen such blades.. my nikkor AF 85/1.4, etc.. must have been brain dead here.. apologies


Last edited by bobfriedman on Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:19 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is perhaps slightly aside of the blade count list, but I'm always 'shaping' my understanding of photography.

I'd be curious what you folk each feel is the magic number (of blades)?

I'll admit I'm a fan of blatant polygons. I rather enjoy the 5 and 6 blade pentagonal and hexagonal shapes in my highlights if I'm stopping down, but they seem out of fashion in todays world from a marketing standpoint. I often notice in movie bokeh however, polygonal is the norm and I wonder why still cameras are different? I theorize, but I don't know.

I've often thought being able to choose aperture shape would be an interesting step. Not just with the lensbaby, but on a 'serious' lens. Perhaps a switch that would disengage half the blades, so the aperture could be a 10 or 5 blade design for example. Anyways... I find the topic interesting - sorry for the ramble, heh!

ps - @ BobF - Pentax, in their literature on the upcoming DA*55/1.4 make some bold claims of the magic their curved blades will weave over 'creamy' bokeh. I giggle at the ability of the marketing dept to conjure up such things, but the fact that it will have curved blades may be of interest.


PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 2:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i guess the design criteria must consider the performance with an automatic diaphram, friction et. al.. preset makes it much easier to design a multiblade system.. curved clearly is desirable to minimize the number of blades for a circularly symmetric aperture


PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm not sure if it also came in a screw mount but the Leica 560/6.8 has 24 blades and yes it is round!


PostPosted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

no-X wrote:
more than 10 (as I remember):

TAIR 11a: 20 blades
Biotar T 5.8cm/2: 17 blades
Jupiter-9: 15 blades
Meyer Trioplan V 100/2.8: 15 blades
Meyer Orestor (preset Pentacon) V 135/2.8: 15 blades
Meyer Telemegor V 180/5.5: 15 blades
Meyer Orestegor V 200/4: 15 blades
KMZ Helios 44 58/2 (old version): 13 blades
Meyer Telefogar V 90/3.5: 12 blades
Biotar T 58/2: 12 blades


Vivitar 135mm f2.8 has 15 blades.
The Taylor-Hobson 12" (305mm) f4 has 16 blades.


PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The cited website [ http://m42.artlimited.net/site_lenses.php ] returns 404 NOT FOUND. Darn. Anyway, following is my own 10+ iris index (with mounts in parentheses).

From my current accumulation -- focusing lenses:

Isco Westron (M42) 35/2.8 -- 13 blades
Enna Sandmar (Argus) 35/4.5 -- 10
CZJ Tessar (Exakta) 50/2.8 -- 12
Jupiter-9 (M39) 85/2 -- 15 blades
Meyer Trioplan (M42) 100/2.8 -- 15
Enna Tele-Sandmar (Argus) 100/4.5 -- 10
Opticam (T2) 135/2.8 -- 10 blades
Enna Tele-Ennalyt (M42) 135/3.5 -- 13
Hanimar Preset (M42) 135/3.5 -- 13
Jupiter-11 (M39) 135/4 -- 11 blades
Schacht Albinar (Exakta) 135/4.5 -- 18
Meyer Telemegor (M42) 180/5.5 -- 15
Vivitar Tele (T2) 200/3.5 -- 18 blades
Pentax Tele-Takumar (M42) 200/5.6 -- 10
Enna Tele-Ennalyt (M42) 240/4.5 -- 10
Spiratone Telephoto (T2) 400/5.6 -- 13

Non-focusing lenses (ENlarger or MF-folder or LF):

Vega-11U (L39-EN) 50/2.8 -- 10 blades
Zeiss Tessar (33mm MF) 80/2.8 -- 12
Agfa Apotar (1-inch MF) 85/4.5 -- 10
Apos Elgeet (29mm EN) 90/4.5 -- 15
Novoflex Noflexar (M42-EN) 105/3.5 -- 15
Industar-100U (L39-EN) 110/4 -- 10 blades
Ilex Solar Anastigmat (L39-EN) 140/4.5 -- 15
Wollensak Enlarging Raptar (EN) 162/4.5 -- 15
Kodak-Rochester Optical (33mm MF) 162/5.6 -- 10
Gundlach Turner-Reich Anast. (65mm LF) 300/7 -- 15

I should mention that bokeh results from factors other than iris blade count and shape. My Schneider Betavaron 50-125mm enlarger zoom has only 5 blades forming a very star-shaped aperture; but put on extension for non-macro shooting, its bokeh is EXTREMELY smooth and creamy. Maybe the kilo of glass in there has something to do with that, eh?

I'll also note that mount can be significant. This is expecially noticeable with the CZJ Tessar 50/2.8. My Exakta-mount version has 12 blades, while my M42 version has only 5 blades. And cost doesn't necessarily have much to do with blade count. My cheap Hanimar Preset (M42) long 135/3.5 currently sells BIN-NIB on eBay for around US$20, yet has 13 blades. And they work!!


PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 4:33 am    Post subject: M42 lens data Reply with quote

The old M42 site is available with http://web.archive.org/web/20080513010046/http://m42.artlimited.net/site_lenses.php


PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 5:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a Takumar 200mm F3.5 preset lens sitting on my desk right now, around 50 years old, with 18 aperture blades!!!!!!


PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 9:58 pm    Post subject: Yet Reply with quote

Berolina Weitwinkel Typ "N", 35mm f/3,5- 10 blades
Kilfitt Macro-Kilar D Apo, 40mm f/2,8- 10 blades
ISCO- Goettingen Westrocolor, 50mm f/1,9- 12 blades
Kuribayashi C.C. Petri Orikkor, 50mm f2,0- 10 blades
A.Schacht M-Travenar R, 50mm f/2,8- 12 blades
CZJ Tessar red T small, aluminium, 50mm f/2,8- 14 blades
Asahi Opt. Co. Auto-Takumar, 55mm f/2,0- 10 blades
Asahi Opt. Co. Auto-Takumar, 55mm f/2,2- 10 blades
Asahi Opt. Co. Auto-Takumar, 58mm f/2,0- 10 blades
Asahi-Kogaku Takumar, 58mm f/2,4- 12 blades
Taika Harigon 58mm f/1,2 (clone Tamron 58mm f1,2 Mod. 340)- 12 blades
Tamron 58mm f1,2 Mod. 340- 12 blades
CZJ Biotar T 58mm f2,0 (pre-set model)- 10 blades
CZJ Tessar C.Z.Jena 1Q (medium format)- 17 blades
Steinheil Muenchen Qulminar VL, 80mm f/2,8- 16 blades
MOG Primotar red V, M42, 85mm f/3,5- 15 blades
MOG Primotar red V, Meister Korelle, 6x6cm., 85mm f/3,5- 15 blades
Kilfitt Macro-Kilar Apo, 90mm f/2,8- 16 blades
A.Schacht Edixa-Mat-Travenar, 90mm f/2,8- 16 blades
A.Schacht Praktica-Travenar R, 100mm f/3,3- 16 blades
ISCO- Goettingen Isconar, 100mm f4,0- 10 blades
Tait-11, 133mm f/2,8- 20 blades
Steinheil Muenchen Quinar VL, 135mm f/2,8- 10 blades
Accura Supertel Tc, 135mm f/2,8- 16 blades
MOG Primotar red V QS Aluminium/zebra black, 135mm f/3,5- 15 blades
A.Schacht Edixa-Mat-Travenar-A, 135mm f/3,5- 16 blades
Kuribayashi K.C. Petri Orikkor (Kyoei clone), 135mm f/3,5- 12 blades
Kuribayashi K.C. Petri Orikkor (Kyoei clone), 180mm f/3,5- 12 blades
Promura, 135mm f/3,5- 13 blades
CZJ Triotar red T, 135mm f/4,0- 15 blades
Steinheil Muenchen Culminar VL, 135mm f/4,5- 16 blades
Fujitar P.C, 150mm f4,0- 16 blades
Kilfitt Kilar C (APO) LTM Visoflex, 135mm f3,5- 16 blades
Hama Macrotel, 150mm f/4,5- 16 blades
CZJ Sonnar 1Q, 180mm f2,8- 18 blades
MOG Primotar 1Q, 180mm f/3,5- 15 blades


PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 7:50 am    Post subject: Re: Lens blade count index - M42/M39 Reply with quote

bobfriedman wrote:
Does anyone know where I could find a lens index by blade count or vice versa?


There's the All Photo Lenses database here:

http://allphotolenses.com/lenses.html

This does have information on the number of blades in many of the lenses, but unfortunately the field doesn't seem to be searchable.