View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ash
![Level 1 Level 1](rating1.gif) Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 185 Location: Evanston, il, usa
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:53 pm Post subject: Jupiter 37 A 135mm Sample |
|
|
Ash wrote:
Recently got Jupiter 37A 135mm. Took it out today to test it. First impression: Really sharp lens with super smooth bokeh. Some samples:
![](http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20103/2651_DSC09973_mf_raw_1.jpg) |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Schnauzer
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 09 Apr 2008 Posts: 2155 Location: Maine, USA
Expire: 2012-03-08
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Schnauzer wrote:
Nice samples.
I also very much enjoy this lense. My favorite 135. _________________ Ron |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
estudleon
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
It's a good lens. One of the best 135. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
fish4570
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 06 Jan 2010 Posts: 4514 Location: At the confluence of the Locust Fork of the Warrior River and Black Creek, Alabama
Expire: 2012-03-21
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fish4570 wrote:
mounted on?
i am glad to see the forsythia buds and other signs of spring up your way. we are not far ahead down here in my river valley. spring is a tad late this year ... _________________ Paul
I chase Light
http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Ash
![Level 1 Level 1](rating1.gif) Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 185 Location: Evanston, il, usa
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ash wrote:
Mounted on sony a200.. believe it or not it is near chicago. Weather is been really good this past week. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
martinsmith99
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
That looks a very nice lens.
How does it compare to the CZ 135 Sonnar (to anyone that has used both)? _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Ash
![Level 1 Level 1](rating1.gif) Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 185 Location: Evanston, il, usa
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ash wrote:
I dont have CNJ 135mm but I have heard that Jupiter 37A is its clone. So it should replicate its performance. What say..? |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Ash
![Level 1 Level 1](rating1.gif) Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 185 Location: Evanston, il, usa
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ash wrote:
I dont have CNJ 135mm but I have heard that Jupiter 37A is its clone. So it should replicate its performance. What say..? |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Poolhall
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 25 Feb 2008 Posts: 1296
|
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poolhall wrote:
Ace lens nice samples- personally I prefer the J37A to the CZJ sonnar but they are very similar to my eyes anyway- they used to be a good bit cheaper than a sonnar too but not so much anymore, maybe that gives an indication as to the quality. ![Very Happy](images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif) |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
martinsmith99
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Poolhall wrote: |
Ace lens nice samples- personally I prefer the J37A to the CZJ sonnar but they are very similar to my eyes anyway- they used to be a good bit cheaper than a sonnar too but not so much anymore, maybe that gives an indication as to the quality. ![Very Happy](images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif) |
Well my 37A is on its way to me so I'll do a comparison if it ever stops raining! _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
ik13
Joined: 07 Oct 2009 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 11:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ik13 wrote:
It's a very nice inexpensive 135mm.
I got one of these last year and like it very much. There was a ton of exposed grease and I was a bit afraid that some might get on the sensor. Took mine apart to clean and re-lube it and had a bit of a hard time putting the focusing helicoid back. Anyways.
For the quality it delivers this is IMO the most underrated manual lens in my bag. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Excalibur
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
***It's a very nice inexpensive 135mm.***
HUH not on ebay, only ones ATM are from Russia £50 inc del....an inexpensive 135mm is a Vivitar 135mm f2.8. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
peterqd
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Which version do you have Ash?
I agree with Ron, this lens is my favourite 135 too. I was influnced by the pictures Orio took with his and I wasn't disappointed. It's difficult to find a bad 135 but the J-37A with its superb colour rendition really does shine. Mine is the old-style plain 37A (not MC) with white lettering and the 1980 Olympic logo. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
djmike
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 930 Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
djmike wrote:
I would also like to know is what version of my copy is? SN started with 846xxx. Does this also mean this lens is built in Y1984?
![](http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20103/1336_J37_1.jpg) _________________
DSLR: Canon 400D
SLR: Nikon FM2 + Canon A-1 + Canon AE1-P + Praktica MTL-5B + Pentax Spotmatic F + Fujica ST801 + Voigtlander Bassematic + Voigtlander Vito + Rollei 35S + Rolleiflex SL35 ME + Canon QL17 GIII + Olympus Pen EE-3
Lenses
M42: CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4 + CZJ Flektogon Zebra 35/2.8 + CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 + CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 + CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 Chrome + Pentacon 135/2.8 + Pentacon 50/1.8 + SMC Takumar 50/1.4 + SMC Takumar 55/2 + SMC Takumar 135/3.5 + Fujinon 55/1.8 + Jupiter-9 85/2 + Jupiter-37A 135/3.5 + Helios 44-6 58/2
Nikor: Nikkor 50/1.4 + Nikkor 28/3.5 + Nikkor 35-105 Zoom + 36-72 Series E Zoom
Canon: Canon FD + 28/2.8 + 50/1.8 + Canon 35-105 Macro Zoom
Other: Rollei Planar HFT 50/1.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
martinsmith99
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
That serial number does indeed suggest the year as you state. I am no expert, but it looks like a multi coated version looking at the glass.
I await confirmation by our Russian equipment guru Mr Poolhall. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Ash
![Level 1 Level 1](rating1.gif) Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 185 Location: Evanston, il, usa
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ash wrote:
I have a MC version. Same as djmike. Really like this lens. And got that as a gift on my birthday . |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
dimitrygo
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 561
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dimitrygo wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
That serial number does indeed suggest the year as you state. I am no expert, but it looks like a multi coated version looking at the glass.
I await confirmation by our Russian equipment guru Mr Poolhall. |
Yes this is a production year. But this is not a multi-coated version. At least all multi-coated versions I saw before have MC designation and a bluish or greenish coating. But what is strange that MC versions were produced already in 1983 (or may be even before) so it means both MC and non-MC versions were pruced some period in parallel. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Poolhall
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 25 Feb 2008 Posts: 1296
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poolhall wrote:
Its 1984 ok and Dmitrygo is quite right usually if its multicoated it has #MC on it in red, my Jupiter 37A is not multicoated and its 1985- my Jupiter 37AM is multicoated has 'MC' on it and is 1994. BTW there is also an H-30 designation that both Moleman342 and I think no-x have seen which I believe is an early designation for MC but as yet cannot be proved . Whichever version it is an excellent lens and I too rarely go out without one or the other with me ![Very Happy](images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif) |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
peterqd
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Yep, I concur. The versions I know about are:
Single-coated:
37A
37AM
Multi-coated
MC 37A
MC 37AM
I think the "M" stands for "modernised" These are later versions which have the lettering in green and yellow. Prior to this the lettering was in white.
Thanks to whoever it was for explaining the preset mechanism on this lens. I never knew that before. I thought the lens was just a simple stop-down like the I-50!
Is it OK to post one or two sample pics here taken with the different versions? _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
natebarnz
![Level 2 Level 2](rating2.gif) Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 331 Location: Los Angeles / Tucson
Expire: 2013-01-23
|
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
natebarnz wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
Is it OK to post one or two sample pics here taken with the different versions? |
I would be very interested to know which version is the best. I plan to get one of these soon and am not entirely sure which one to get yet. Maybe a new thread would be ideal for the real comparison? _________________ 500D / SPII / FTn / Contax D / 137MA / Contaflex
Contax 28/2 - 35/1.4 - 35/2.8 - 45/2.8 - 50/1.4 - 100/3.5 - 135/2.8
CZJ 20/4 - 35/2.8 - 50/2.8 - 58/2 - 135/3.5
Rokkor PG 58/1.2 - PF 58/1.4 - X 85/1.7
Nikkor S 55/1.2 - H 85/1.8 - P.C. 55/3.5
Helios 44-2 58/2 Meyer Oreston 50/1.8
Elmarit-R 90/2.8 Sears 55/1.4
--> Visit My Picasa Galleries <-- |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
peterqd
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
I remember Orio saying he'd tried all the different versions and didn't find a lot of difference. The MC versions might be a little more contrasty maybe, but that was never a shortcoming with the older ones.
This is with my plain old 37A:
![](http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20103/27_IMG_0502_1.jpg) _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
djmike
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 930 Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
djmike wrote:
Peter has a good copy. Here is mine shot in last weekend before rain.
![](http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20103/1336_IMG_0075_1.jpg) _________________
DSLR: Canon 400D
SLR: Nikon FM2 + Canon A-1 + Canon AE1-P + Praktica MTL-5B + Pentax Spotmatic F + Fujica ST801 + Voigtlander Bassematic + Voigtlander Vito + Rollei 35S + Rolleiflex SL35 ME + Canon QL17 GIII + Olympus Pen EE-3
Lenses
M42: CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4 + CZJ Flektogon Zebra 35/2.8 + CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 + CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 + CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 Chrome + Pentacon 135/2.8 + Pentacon 50/1.8 + SMC Takumar 50/1.4 + SMC Takumar 55/2 + SMC Takumar 135/3.5 + Fujinon 55/1.8 + Jupiter-9 85/2 + Jupiter-37A 135/3.5 + Helios 44-6 58/2
Nikor: Nikkor 50/1.4 + Nikkor 28/3.5 + Nikkor 35-105 Zoom + 36-72 Series E Zoom
Canon: Canon FD + 28/2.8 + 50/1.8 + Canon 35-105 Macro Zoom
Other: Rollei Planar HFT 50/1.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
martinsmith99
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Mine arrived and it appears to be single coated.
I thought the M designation on Russian lenses meant that worked with auto diaphragm?
It may be a sonnar copy but it's not as sharp as one in my quick tests. It's about level with my Pentacon but obviously slower. I need to test this lens against my other 135s as I don't have room for 3 of them. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
ManualFocus-G
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
I've got one coming today as well, with a Zenit 12XP (yay!) and a Helios 44M-4. One can never have enough Helios 44s ![Laughing](images/smiles/icon_lol.gif) _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
natebarnz
![Level 2 Level 2](rating2.gif) Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 331 Location: Los Angeles / Tucson
Expire: 2013-01-23
|
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
natebarnz wrote:
Shrek wrote: |
One can never have enough Helios 44s ![Laughing](images/smiles/icon_lol.gif) |
I'm learning to agree with this statement _________________ 500D / SPII / FTn / Contax D / 137MA / Contaflex
Contax 28/2 - 35/1.4 - 35/2.8 - 45/2.8 - 50/1.4 - 100/3.5 - 135/2.8
CZJ 20/4 - 35/2.8 - 50/2.8 - 58/2 - 135/3.5
Rokkor PG 58/1.2 - PF 58/1.4 - X 85/1.7
Nikkor S 55/1.2 - H 85/1.8 - P.C. 55/3.5
Helios 44-2 58/2 Meyer Oreston 50/1.8
Elmarit-R 90/2.8 Sears 55/1.4
--> Visit My Picasa Galleries <-- |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
|