View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Kathmandu
Joined: 09 Dec 2009 Posts: 1479 Location: (Kathmandu,Nepal. Currently)Pacific Northwest, USA
Expire: 2012-04-08
|
Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 12:51 am Post subject: Isco-Göttingen Westar 100mm f4.5 in Exakta Mt. |
|
|
Kathmandu wrote:
Any /experience/opinions/image samples on this lens? Got this at an antique shop~and there is some fungi on the back of the front element, and the front of the second element that I did not see earlier. I have applied some herbal fungicide-and am letting it bath under a UV lamp for now,before I clean it with naphtha and Eclipse.
Last edited by Kathmandu on Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:25 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6624 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
That is a fabulous looking lens! _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kathmandu
Joined: 09 Dec 2009 Posts: 1479 Location: (Kathmandu,Nepal. Currently)Pacific Northwest, USA
Expire: 2012-04-08
|
Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kathmandu wrote:
The lens cleaned up pretty well except the fungus-which has left an imprint on the glass. The lens is usable now . Its a unique looking lens for sure. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Is that imprint on a coating, or is the lens too old for coatings? I wonder how fungus does that - glass is a very hard surface. Will it affect the image at all? _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kathmandu
Joined: 09 Dec 2009 Posts: 1479 Location: (Kathmandu,Nepal. Currently)Pacific Northwest, USA
Expire: 2012-04-08
|
Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kathmandu wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
Is that imprint on a coating, or is the lens too old for coatings? I wonder how fungus does that - glass is a very hard surface. Will it affect the image at all? |
It looks as though it has a coating -The Fungus has left an etching of itself on the glass. I have seen worst etchings left by fungi on lens elements-to the point they look like pit marks. It does not seem to affect the image @ this point so I plan on using it this way-and periodically bathing it in my UV box.I don't foresee cleaning this further lest I mar the glass.
I am always open to suggestions. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kathmandu
Joined: 09 Dec 2009 Posts: 1479 Location: (Kathmandu,Nepal. Currently)Pacific Northwest, USA
Expire: 2012-04-08
|
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kathmandu wrote:
Some images, with this fungus etched lens- showing signs of its past glory days -This lens could have a few applications as the tube in the back(with lens mount) is just an extension and screws off. The lens helical,aperture ,elements all reside in the smaller upper-half.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Byngo
Joined: 25 Oct 2010 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Byngo wrote:
I have a lens like this but in M42 mount. Not the sharpest in the pack but it produces surprisingly vivid and pleasant colors. From this POV probably the best lens after Mamiya/Sekor 50mm f1.4. Enjoy it. It's a fun lens to work with. _________________ "Light is the source of all beauty and knowledge." XVII century manuscript |
|
Back to top |
|
|
indianadinos
Joined: 06 Jul 2008 Posts: 1310 Location: Toulouse, France
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
indianadinos wrote:
Kathmandu wrote: |
This lens could have a few applications as the tube in the back(with lens mount) is just an extension and screws off. The lens helical,aperture ,elements all reside in the smaller upper-half.
|
Quite common for a lens of that epoch. It was done on purpose, to allow using the optical head on a bellows without the barrel ...
You could have some nice surprises trying this setup ... _________________ Please visit my blogs Shooting with a Pentax K10D / FF Visions
Takumar: 24/3.5, 28/3.5, 35/2, 35/3.5, 50/1.4, 55/1.8, 85/1.8, 105/2.8, 120/2.8, 135/3.5, 150/4, 200/4
Pentax-K: M28/2.8, K28/3.5, M50/1.4, A50/1.7, M50/4 Macro, K85/1.8, K105/2.8, K135/2.5, M200/4, M70-150/4
Zeiss: Flektogon 20/2.8, 20/4, 35/2.4, 35/2.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, Biotar 58/2, Sonnar 135/3.5, Sonnar 180/2.8
Meyer: Primagon 35/4.5, Domiplan 50/2.8, Oreston 50/1.8, Primoplan 58/1.9, Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Orestor 135/2.8
Schacht/Steinheil: Travenar 90/2.8, Travenon 135/4.5, Quinar 135/2.8, Quinar 135/3.5
Russian: MIR 37B, Industar 50/3.5, Helios 44M & 44M-2, Jupiter 37A
P6: Flektogon 50/4, Biometar 80/2.8, Orestor 300/4
Nikkor: Nikkor-O 35/2, Micro 55/3.5, Nikkor-S 50/1.4, Nikkor-Q 135/2.8
Fuji: EBC 28/3.5, EBC 55/3.5 Macro, EBC 135/2.5
Misc Lenses: Kiron 105/2.8 Macro, Tamron SP90/2.5
... and a few other Vivitar, Tamron, Sigma and Soligor lenses ...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 1120 Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
I just won one of these on eBay, only a few hours ago, for US$10+$8 shipped. Now I feel so coincidental.
Everybody: What is your favorite 100/4.5 lens?
I'll vote for the Enna Tele-Sandmar. What's yours? _________________ Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
I like this lens, it's unusual looking, very lightweight and can produce decent pictures. Here's a couple of shoots from mine
_________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nukemall
Joined: 24 Apr 2012 Posts: 96 Location: Blagoveschensk, Russia
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 1:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
nukemall wrote:
My Isco Westar 100/4.5 converted from Exakta to M42:
And some samples:
_________________ My blog |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Beautiful crisp samples, congrats! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3073 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
Attila wrote: |
Beautiful crisp samples, congrats! |
+1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
burrencrawler
Joined: 10 May 2014 Posts: 5 Location: Ireland
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
burrencrawler wrote:
Yes, I cant believe the quality and clarity from this lens! I have one of these, used it once, and then put it back under my bed.
I just tried taking the lens apart to try and clean the lens elements, lost a tiny spring and tiny ball bearing that fell out from not holding it upright, then the aperture blades stopped working for some strange reason, I didn't touch them and they were smooth as butter before I took it apart. Tried putting it back together and now the aperture ring is completely stiff (and aperture blades still don't work) and now thw focus is totally stiff. I just ruined a nice lens (Had the elements cleaned perfectly with no dust or fungus. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sun May 11, 2014 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
burrencrawler wrote: |
Yes, I cant believe the quality and clarity from this lens! I have one of these, used it once, and then put it back under my bed.
I just tried taking the lens apart to try and clean the lens elements, lost a tiny spring and tiny ball bearing that fell out from not holding it upright, then the aperture blades stopped working for some strange reason, I didn't touch them and they were smooth as butter before I took it apart. Tried putting it back together and now the aperture ring is completely stiff (and aperture blades still don't work) and now thw focus is totally stiff. I just ruined a nice lens (Had the elements cleaned perfectly with no dust or fungus. |
Happens to me too. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pdccameras
Joined: 23 Aug 2009 Posts: 826 Location: Putnam, CT
Expire: 2014-08-11
|
Posted: Sun May 11, 2014 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pdccameras wrote:
You got some great, sharp shots. Congratulations.
I have this lens in native M42 mount. I like using it on a NEX (A7 in this case) with about 12mm of extension. Makes a nice "garden" lens
_________________ Canon 5D Mii, Canon 40D, Canon 350D IR, Sony A7 Mii, Sony Alpha-6000, a ton of lenses: AF & MF and too many cameras to count, all formats: 110 - 4x5. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3073 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
I am curious Kathmandu, how you were able to take apart and put that lens back together. I have one that unscrews
when I focus up close. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mos6502
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 Posts: 961 Location: Austin
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mos6502 wrote:
uddhava wrote: |
I am curious Kathmandu, how you were able to take apart and put that lens back together. I have one that unscrews
when I focus up close. |
The front element unscrews? It should have a pin inside that keeps the focus ring from turning too far. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3073 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
Mos6502 wrote: |
uddhava wrote: |
I am curious Kathmandu, how you were able to take apart and put that lens back together. I have one that unscrews
when I focus up close. |
The front element unscrews? It should have a pin inside that keeps the focus ring from turning too far. |
Thank you, but sorry I did not explain it clearly. The two screws(circled in red) are missing. That is why it can unscrew. I will have to get some screws to fasten that. However, when I fasten it the focusing stop(circled in green) will hit the pin and I won't be able to screw the lens back together.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mos6502
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 Posts: 961 Location: Austin
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mos6502 wrote:
uddhava wrote: |
Mos6502 wrote: |
uddhava wrote: |
I am curious Kathmandu, how you were able to take apart and put that lens back together. I have one that unscrews
when I focus up close. |
The front element unscrews? It should have a pin inside that keeps the focus ring from turning too far. |
Thank you, but sorry I did not explain it clearly. The two screws(circled in red) are missing. That is why it can unscrew. I will have to get some screws to fasten that. However, when I fasten it the focusing stop(circled in green) will hit the pin and I won't be able to screw the lens back together.
|
There are set screws around the outside of the focus ring that need to be loosened to allow the inside to turn while the outside is stationary. Once it is screwed in, one can match the focus to the indicated distance and retighten the screws. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3073 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
Mos6502 wrote: |
uddhava wrote: |
Mos6502 wrote: |
uddhava wrote: |
I am curious Kathmandu, how you were able to take apart and put that lens back together. I have one that unscrews
when I focus up close. |
The front element unscrews? It should have a pin inside that keeps the focus ring from turning too far. |
Thank you, but sorry I did not explain it clearly. The two screws(circled in red) are missing. That is why it can unscrew. I will have to get some screws to fasten that. However, when I fasten it the focusing stop(circled in green) will hit the pin and I won't be able to screw the lens back together.
|
There are set screws around the outside of the focus ring that need to be loosened to allow the inside to turn while the outside is stationary. Once it is screwed in, one can match the focus to the indicated distance and retighten the screws. |
Thanks for the information! BTW, do you have any idea where I could purchase the small screws I would need? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3073 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
Any idea what size those screws are? I don't have any so narrow. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2931 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
I have an M42 100 4.5. My first isco. I was quite impressed and purchased several more. Some of these were very good others, meh. I too have ruined good lenses. I bought a rolleiflex sl35 with a planar 50 1.8. Trying to use a big-is adapter that allows infinity the aperture pin became detached from a connecting stirrup. Trying to reconnect the other end of the linkage detached. It's inside the housing with the aperture and I can't figure out how to open it. Mfl should set up a lens resurrection cooperative. Send in your damaged, parts missing lenses, get points toward purchase of a refurbished lens? _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2016 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
Is that imprint on a coating, or is the lens too old for coatings? I wonder how fungus does that - glass is a very hard surface. Will it affect the image at all? |
I know this is an old post, but thought I should add my 2 cents.
The fungus releases an acid, the acid etches the glass/coating if left for a long period, thats why you get it cleaned asap.
The IQ shouldn't be effected all that much till most of the element is etched, the PSF will show the etching. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cculver
Joined: 12 Apr 2024 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 5:07 pm Post subject: help with my isco |
|
|
cculver wrote:
Not sure if this conversation is still active or not. in your second photo.. I see another possible cover or lens laying flat on the piece of paper - what is that? My lens does not have that piece. My bigger question is this - I had to take my lens apart much like you did but when putting it back together.. I cant figure how much to screw in the front glass piece. you have it shown screwed into your top piece but I had to unscrew it. when I screw the glass piece back in..do I screw it down all the way ? not too tight? my lens wont focus so I dont know what is going on. thank you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|