View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Companon 28/4 sample:
http://i.imgur.com/6hft6b8.jpg
No post processing at all, just downsized. This lens is amasingly sharp at center at F4 even.
[CuriousOne: Your pic is too big for this forum (max. 1024 px wide) and I've changed it to a link. If you want to post large images
without resizing, either post in the Oversize Gallery or use the Picture Upload button which will resize for you. Thanks, peterqd] _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
memetph
Joined: 01 Dec 2013 Posts: 942 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
memetph wrote:
The Sigma 30mm seems to be a very good idea |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Yes, except the "low" price it has. _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4748 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
I agree about the kit lens, if you dont have one a new one will be expensive. I use an adapted lens from a Konica rangefinder that was broken. Its incredibly sharp and is no bigger than many of the samples shown here, another good lens to convert would be the Contax Minotar/Minoxar lens from a CL or similar. Full focusing and aperture control and very easy to adapt.. Its 35mm so a little long for MFT but very usable on the NEX. I use a reversing ring for my conversions, its the thinnest adapter you can get. I cut a circle of MDF and fixed the lens to it and sanded the back of the MDF down until I got infinity focus. Simple really and needing no specialist tools other than a screwdriver, scissors, hole saw and a file. Plus glue and a bit of sandpaper.
Some pics taken last year, the diamond aperture has a distinctive bokeh about f4 to see the shape of the aperture
edit: It actually sticks out as far as the Sony SEL16-50 kit lens. _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
Componon 28/4 is nice enlarger lens. I have Rodenstock Rodagon 28/4, it's my fave lens to be travel kit. for compactness, and sharp.
SAMPLES HERE _________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Took additional photos with that 28/4 lens.
It has quite strange behavior: It is super sharp in center at F4, and not so good at corners, but when stopped down, instead of corners improving, center gets worse, so at F8, whole image is equally bad. _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
harry tibi
Joined: 11 Nov 2011 Posts: 58 Location: nl
|
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
harry tibi wrote:
Of course the Minox Minotar/Minoxar (has nothing to do with Contax!) is the lens to go with. Find a broken Minox 35 (there are lots of them, most of them have problems with the electric contacts), take off the lens, glue the shutter wide open, remove all non-necessary parts and adapt it on a C-mount adapter. You won't need machining skills, and you'll be surprised by the results. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Get a broken Contax T2 and strip the Sonnar T* 2.8/38. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4573 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
I had adapted a Minotar to Leica M so that I can use it on both my mirrorless cams ( Ricoh GXR M and NEX5n )
I was really taken aback by the strong contrast loss and easy flare when used against light. Later learned that earlier Minox cameras like the 'EL' I had used as donor cam had used single coated, later models multi coated lenses. So anyone who wants to adapt this lens I'd advice to get a late model _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
harry tibi
Joined: 11 Nov 2011 Posts: 58 Location: nl
|
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
harry tibi wrote:
I was really taken aback by the strong contrast loss and easy flare when used against light.
Well, you can't have it all, can you? Shooting against light is tricky with almost any lens, only top league players are satisfactory in that respect, I'm afraid... In the meantime, enhancing contrast is easy in PP, and flare can be used artistically |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4748 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
My Minotar shots were a little flat, auto contrast sorted that out nicely as you can see. And its a remarkably sharp lens. The great thing with this lens is its so easy to adapt as the aperture is separate from the shutter, many arent.
I bought a lens hood for it - what a waste of time. A pathetic afterthought that fits but comes off every time you focus. _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Joke about T2 was especially nice, considering cameras start $250 average on ebay _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
CuriousOne wrote: |
Joke about T2 was especially nice, considering cameras start $250 average on ebay |
It is a joke only if you have not digest my suggestion and do some homework.
Click here to see on Ebay
P.S. I see another similar boken camera sold in the US for ~$50 this year. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Sure, auctions can show wonders, but when you need something right now, you have to stick to "buy it now". _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Sure. Inexpensive things does not show up if you are in a hurry. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
harry tibi
Joined: 11 Nov 2011 Posts: 58 Location: nl
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
harry tibi wrote:
You might think it's as deep as the 16-50 standard zoom, but actually, it's 5 mm less deep And its volume is way less! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
harry tibi
Joined: 11 Nov 2011 Posts: 58 Location: nl
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
harry tibi wrote:
Ah, there it is. Forgot how to upload a picture. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
newst
Joined: 21 Oct 2014 Posts: 617 Location: Troy, MI USA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 1:25 pm Post subject: Schneider Kreuznach |
|
|
newst wrote:
An exotic but not unreasonable suggestion. The Xenons were made for the ROBOT automatic SLR cameras. Like any S-K lens I have ever sen they are the top in quality, both in construction and in optics. They are old style chromed brass construction. These lenses use an M26 screw mount that Kipon sells an NEX adapter for.
The 38mm 1:2.8 lens and mount together extend 1-5/16 in from the NEX mount. This is an earlier single coated lens. My copy cost $169.00 on Ebay.
The 40mm 1:1.9 lens and mount together extend 1-5/8 in from the NEX mount. This is a multi-coated lens. My copy cost $161.00 including shipping on Ebay.
Both are larger than an Industar 69 on an M39 mount, still the smallest NEX combo I have found, but I wouldn't wish the Industar lens on anyone. _________________ Steve
Just an armadillo on the shoulder of the information superhighway.
Last edited by newst on Wed Oct 22, 2014 1:34 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 1:33 pm Post subject: Re: Schneider Kreuznach |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
newst wrote: |
An exotic but not unreasonable suggestion. The Xenons were made for the ROBOT automatic SLR cameras. Like any S-K lens I have ever sen they are the top in quality, both in construction and in optics. They are old style chromed brass construction. These lenses use an M26 screw mount that Kipon sells an NEX adapter for.
1. The 38mm 1:2.8 lens and mount together extend 1-5/16 in from the NEX mount. This is an earlier single coated lens. My copy cost $169.00 on Ebay. Here it is mounted on an NEX-6.
2. The 40mm 1:1.9 lens and mount together extend 1-5/8 in from the NEX mount. This is a multi-coated lens. My copy cost $161.00 including shipping on Ebay.
3. Here is a comparison of the 38mm lens and mount with an Industar 69 on an M39 mount. Still the smallest NEX combo I have found but I wouldn't wish the Industar lens on anyone.
|
Welcome! _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
newst
Joined: 21 Oct 2014 Posts: 617 Location: Troy, MI USA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
newst wrote:
Calvin. Thank you for the welcome and for re-posting my photographs. I tried several times but couldn't get them to show on my post. Maybe it's just me. Anyway, those two lenses and a 75mm ROBOT Xenon are new acquisitions that have immediately become my 'small' kit. _________________ Steve
Just an armadillo on the shoulder of the information superhighway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013 Posts: 393 Location: Bremen, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
harry tibi wrote: |
Ah, there it is. Forgot how to upload a picture. |
BEHOLD... THE SINGULARITY! _________________ Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Good that I've checked wiki and found out that Pentax 110 has no aperture control.
P.S. I have CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 M42. A colleague ofered me to exchange it to Leica lens(he does not remembers the name but he said it is 35mm and for M39 mount). He'll bring the lens tomorrow, so let's see. _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 350 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
CuriousOne wrote: |
Good that I've checked wiki and found out that Pentax 110 has no aperture control.
|
well, it was also on my post .
I wish also to remember your requirements that led me suggest a I-69 or some disposable camera lens:
CuriousOne wrote: |
Inexpensive - I mean bargain ,old school, one that can be found at pawn shop and so on. Less than $50. Preferably, better than $10 Smile For "serious" shooting, I have native lens, so I'm looking for tiny, inexpensive, trashy lens. |
_________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013 Posts: 393 Location: Bremen, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
CuriousOne wrote: |
P.S. I have CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 M42. A colleague offered me to exchange it to Leica lens(he does not remembers the name but he said it is 35mm and for M39 mount). |
If it's an original Leica, you definitely got the better end of that deal... _________________ Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
I 69 and I 22 already got for almost nothing and are on their way. Also Got I50Y - enlarge lens, and despite ugly shape, it performs quite good. _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|