| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RTOGOG
Joined: 24 Apr 2009 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 10:16 pm Post subject: Hi-matic F vs Minolta Hi-matic CS |
|
|
What are the differences between Minolta Hi-matic F vs Minolta Hi-matic CS?
I have the first one and the shape look the same. I googled it but can not find the manual for the last one.
Thank you for your help |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Minolfan


Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 2229 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hardly anything decent to find must be rather rare!
It appears to be very alike the F indeed, but black.
Iso 25 - 500 (Iso 25 - 400)
Seiko shutter 4sec - 1/724, just like the F
Battery 2x PX640 (replacable by 2x SR44 and a dummy)
Flash auto exposure by GN |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eugen Mezei

Joined: 17 May 2008 Posts: 169
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Exactly the same as the F. If I remember correctly the S stands for Sears, as it was manufactured for this Hypermarket chain. Avaible only in black. Maybe rare in Europe. If I find the link where my information is, I will post it.
| Minolfan wrote: |
Battery 2x PX640 (replacable by 2x SR44 and a dummy)
|
Are you shure? I mean have you tested this with slide film?
Eugen |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Minolfan


Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 2229 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No , I did not test with slide film.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RTOGOG
Joined: 24 Apr 2009 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Minolfan wrote: | Hardly anything decent to find must be rather rare!
It appears to be very alike the F indeed, but black.
Iso 25 - 500 (Iso 25 - 400)
Seiko shutter 4sec - 1/724, just like the F
Battery 2x PX640 (replacable by 2x SR44 and a dummy)
Flash auto exposure by GN |
Thanks for your kind reply.
My camera just arrived, but can not find the battery.
I still confused with your statement "replacable by 2x SR44 and a dummy" above.
Rtogog |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RTOGOG
Joined: 24 Apr 2009 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Minolfan wrote: | Hardly anything decent to find must be rather rare!
It appears to be very alike the F indeed, but black.
Iso 25 - 500 (Iso 25 - 400)
Seiko shutter 4sec - 1/724, just like the F
Battery 2x PX640 (replacable by 2x SR44 and a dummy)
Flash auto exposure by GN |
Thanks for your kind reply.
My camera just arrived, but can not find the battery.
I still confused with your statement "replacable by 2x SR44 and a dummy" above.
Rtogog |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eugen Mezei

Joined: 17 May 2008 Posts: 169
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use LR44 size mercuries around which I put an O-Ring number 9 (I think that is inner diameter 9). This way you have the diameter of a 625 battery. The original batteries (PX640) have this diameter but are taller. So I fill the remaining space with two balls (one per battery) of aluminium foil. Put an insulating separator between the two batteries, so you don't have a short. A piece of folded paper is sufficient.
The elegant solution would be to machine two adaptors. Can be done by every mechanical shop with a lathe. Dimensions existed on the net, but I don't find the site right now. But no problem for any shop. In fact you could take a rod of appropiate diameter and drill a hole on one end where you fit you battery in.
I use real mercuries, but maybe if you expose negative film (I expose slides) it will work with alkalines too.
Eugen |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Minolfan


Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 2229 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I stack two SR44 on one side and some metal bolt (the dummy) in the other part of the batterychamber.
It can also be done this way: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigshock/3573056331/
Each side one and some metal spring to fill the space. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|