Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
Perhaps it is of interest to see what happens in the wide angle department. The Nikkor at 18mm corresponds to about a 27mm lens for full frame, so I compared the Nikkor performance with a Tamron 28mm F2.8 and a Pentacon 29mm F2.8. Before someone comments on the results, I would say that all the lenses are in perfect order and do not suffer from decentering, so I believe the results are representative for these lenses.
The 100% crops are from the upper left corner. The apertures used were F3.5 and F11 for the Nikkor, and F4 and F11 for the other lenses.
Wide angle lenses traditionally have great difficulty in providing sharpness in the corners, especially for wide open condition. The performance of the Pentacon 29mm at the extreme corner follows the usual pattern of many old retrofocus wide angle lenses: the performance is quite poor for wide open, but gradually increases until it reaches the maximum at F16. Interestingly, the peak performance of the Nikkor occurs about the maximum aperture!
It is clear that the Tamron cannot match the Nikkor at the corners, but the Tamron performs significantly better than the Pentacon.
If the results at corners can be a little scary, the performances in the center are much more civilized, as shown by the 100% crops for F3.5 (Nikkor) and F4 (Tamron and Pentacon). After F5.6 the performance in the center are more or less the same.
EDIT: I wanted to add that the distortion of the Nikkor at 18mm is very ugly, and much worse than the Tamron and Pentacon. On the other hand, the D5300 and other Nikon cameras automatically correct distortion if Auto Distortion Control is set to ON. In the tests, the distortion was not corrected. The photos were captured in RAW and converted to JPEG with ACR with sharpening control set to zero. _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |