View previous topic :: View next topic |
Should I buy? |
Yes |
|
40% |
[ 4 ] |
No |
|
60% |
[ 6 ] |
|
Total Votes : 10 |
|
Author |
Message |
GJPARK
Joined: 28 Oct 2014 Posts: 7 Location: Quito, Ecuador
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 4:07 am Post subject: Help me deside on this Vivitar series 1 90mm f2.5 lens |
|
|
GJPARK wrote:
Hello, this is my first post. I'm from Venezuela and now living in Ecuador.
Found this lens plus camera for about 30 dolars on a venezuelan site. The lens looks prety bad. Don't know how bad it is rely, just that its in two pieces so i thought i could buyit and buy a second one with a diferent problem and try to use parts from one to fix the other. I have no interest for the camera but have heard such good compliments about this lens... I allso don't have any prime near that range.
The seller told me he would upload more photos to apretiate the damage better. What would your recomendations be if the glass is clean?
I allso can't find a similar lens for parts at ebay at the moment so I'll probably will have to sit on it for a while before I can fix it.
Shiping is not a consearn since I'v been hoarding MF lenses lately through the ebay equivalent at Venezuela and they are waiting to be shipped at my unkle's house, so actualy I'm looking to fill the package before shipping
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
GJPARK
Joined: 28 Oct 2014 Posts: 7 Location: Quito, Ecuador
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
GJPARK wrote:
Yo can scroll through the images the seller posted here:
http://articulo.mercadolibre.com.ve/MLV-428775961-vendo-camara-canon-a1-con-o-sin-lente-vivitar-series-1-90-mm-_JM#questionText
The last better photos are obviously not from the same seller nor lens, they are just referential |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ray Parkhurst
Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Posts: 497 Location: Santa Clara, CA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ray Parkhurst wrote:
C-FD versions of this lens normally go for around $250 on eBay. If you're handy you might be able to fix it. These are generally very hazy internally. The lens is probably taken apart for a reason, and may not be fixable. I'd personally not waste my time but if you're in a curious or experimental mood you might get it just to play around...Ray |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GJPARK
Joined: 28 Oct 2014 Posts: 7 Location: Quito, Ecuador
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GJPARK wrote:
Ray Parkhurst wrote: |
C-FD versions of this lens normally go for around $250 on eBay. If you're handy you might be able to fix it. These are generally very hazy internally. The lens is probably taken apart for a reason, and may not be fixable. I'd personally not waste my time but if you're in a curious or experimental mood you might get it just to play around...Ray |
Thnx, Ray.
I'm now thinking that if I don't find the lens whitch will provide the refactions I'll probably just improvise some kind of fix |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
Is the Vivitar any better than the more common, cheaper, Tamron 90 / 2.5 ? It's a big risk buying an expensive lens in two parts, it's in two parts for a reason. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GJPARK
Joined: 28 Oct 2014 Posts: 7 Location: Quito, Ecuador
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GJPARK wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
Is the Vivitar any better than the more common, cheaper, Tamron 90 / 2.5 ? It's a big risk buying an expensive lens in two parts, it's in two parts for a reason. |
Reviews on variuos places say it is better than most MF lenses and it goes up to 1:1 magnification while the tamron is 1:2 at the most |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eno789
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 Posts: 159 Location: California
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eno789 wrote:
The Vivitar S1 90mm/2.5 only reaches half life size on its own. The lens might be marked with both 1:2 and 1:1, but the 1:1 is for use with matching extension tube. _________________ Sharpness from lenses; Softness from me.
Nikon DSLR, Sony Mirrorless, Panasonic mu-4/3 - Having fun with MF lenses
https://www.flickr.com/groups/painterly_bokeh |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Not better than Tamron surely, I still have Vivitar had all variants from Tamron and I had Tokina ATX too. Tamron is great lens, highly recommended by me. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
With the tube the Tamron is a superb lens, as indeed it is without. Two for the price of one _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
The lens looks to be in very rough shape, and the pictures don't really show if the rear optics are complete, it's a gamble IMO. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
norland
Joined: 10 Aug 2013 Posts: 165
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
norland wrote:
The weak point of Tamron's 90mm (52BB) is that it can be afflicted with "blue spot" -- not only with direct light ... the time I've had it show up was with reflected light off a white-painted (and grubby, not sparkling clean) aluminium surface when the sun was behind, not in front of, the camera.
It's one of the reasons why for macro or thereabouts I tend to favour Tamron's 35-80mm 01A, and recently a Minolta 35-105mm AF (of the "beer-can" series) combined with achromatic close-up lenses. If I'd had the Minolta then, I probably wouldn't have bought a 52BB. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GJPARK
Joined: 28 Oct 2014 Posts: 7 Location: Quito, Ecuador
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
GJPARK wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
The lens looks to be in very rough shape, and the pictures don't really show if the rear optics are complete, it's a gamble IMO. |
Well, the seller uploaded more pictures. I couldn't find any signs of fatigue. It apears that some one tryed to clean some fungus on the edges of the lens and didn't know how to put it apart nor back together. There still is some fungus growing on the edges, I'm 90% shure it can be cleaned |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I don't have the Vivitar, but it has a great reputation and I would buy one in a shot. But one in two parts with fungus? It would have to be cheap....
I agree the Tamron does suffer with the dreaded blue spot, but I usually find that I can adjust my position slightly and it goes. Using it on a Sony or live view camera I can see the blue spot as it happens very clearly. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337
Last edited by Lloydy on Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:10 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GJPARK
Joined: 28 Oct 2014 Posts: 7 Location: Quito, Ecuador
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
GJPARK wrote:
For those who don't know the lens, people call it bokina, maybe you know it by that name |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GJPARK
Joined: 28 Oct 2014 Posts: 7 Location: Quito, Ecuador
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
GJPARK wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
I don't have the Vivitar, but it has a great reputation and I would buy one in a shot. But one in two parts with fungus? It would have to be cheap....
I agree the Tamron does suffer with the dreaded blue spot, but I usually find that I can adjust my position slightly and it goes. Using it on a Sony or live view camera I can see the blue spot as it happens very clearly. |
Yeah, I still don't know if I'll go for it, my main consearn is waiting for another one to serve as parts donor in case its broken. The fungus dosn't scare me, it was expected for that price, looks cleanable to me |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eno789
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 Posts: 159 Location: California
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
eno789 wrote:
GJPARK wrote: |
For those who don't know the lens, people call it bokina, maybe you know it by that name |
Strictly speaking, the Tokina version of the 90mm/2.5 macro is named as "Bokina" (Bokeh and Tokina).
See http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/20197576 for the origin of the lens nickname.
The Vivitar S1 90mm/2.5 is the precursor of the Bokina. The Tokina version changed to 55mm filter thread, and improved on the coating.
I have both the Tokina macro and the Tamron Adaptall-2 55BB, both are excellent. Between a potentially bad conditioned Vivitar and Tamron, I'd get the Tamron. _________________ Sharpness from lenses; Softness from me.
Nikon DSLR, Sony Mirrorless, Panasonic mu-4/3 - Having fun with MF lenses
https://www.flickr.com/groups/painterly_bokeh |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bruzzo
Joined: 05 Jul 2012 Posts: 153
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 4:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
bruzzo wrote:
Agree on the Tamron
The Vivitar S1 90/2.5 is a great lens, but at the current price the Tamron is cheaper and more affordable and has adaptall-2 mount for many systems. You don't have to worry about not being able to use on a Nikon, Canon, or Pentax DSLR. I have both and both are razor sharp I can't tell the difference in terms of sharpness. The difference would probably be the bokeh, which is very personal. So given the price, the Tamron is a more economic choice, unless you are really strict in the bokeh department.
Also the Tokina 100/2.8 and Sigma 105/2.8 AF should not be that much more expensive than the S1 90/2.5 and 105/2.5 and has different mounts to choose from. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ZoneV
Joined: 09 Nov 2009 Posts: 1633 Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
I like my Vivitar Series 1 90mm/2.5 macro.
I don´t like lenses with Hotspot problems, cause I do not check all the images directly on the camera display . and I am not sure wheter I would see a slight Hotspot there - but probabyl after Lightroom image manipulation.
So I reccomend to buy this lens - in case you are a tinkerer. I would not reccomend it when you never tinkered on lenses. _________________ Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|