View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
cn
Joined: 19 Aug 2013 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:46 pm Post subject: Goats |
|
|
cn wrote:
Hello, this is my first post in this section, please let me know what you think. Planar 1.4/85 MM, full frame (uncropped).
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
inombrable
Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Posts: 545 Location: Salamanca, Mexico
|
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
inombrable wrote:
Hey cn,
I like the subject but I get very distracted by the two out of focus goats in the front and also one of them blocks the main subject. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Don't need to shoot everything wide open , because you can , out focus foreground always a mistake or at least most of the case. If you would demonstrate wide open DOF on this picture, would better to focus on front goat and use F2 or F2.8 , bokeh will be same creamy with better composition and better sharpness of course. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2698 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
Attila wrote: |
Don't need to shoot everything wide open , because you can , out focus foreground always a mistake or at least most of the case. If you would demonstrate wide open DOF on this picture, would better to focus on front goat and use F2 or F2.8 , bokeh will be same creamy with better composition and better sharpness of course. |
What he said. _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cn
Joined: 19 Aug 2013 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
cn wrote:
Thanks for the replies. If I remember correctly, this was in fact shot at f/2, I rarely shoot that lens wide-open even though I can |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1364 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
Quote: |
out focus foreground always a mistake |
I don't want to start an argument, but I have to say that's not at all true as long as out of focus foreground is there on purpose.
And nice photo, I find it quite interesting. The only thing that needs some work is WB. There seems to be a purple cast. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|