View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3245 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 12:15 am Post subject: Gerbera |
|
|
Himself wrote:
First one is Mamiya 120/4 at f/4 and second one is Canon FD 200/4 at f/4.
Different red rendition.
Minimal PP.
_________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2971 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 5:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
very nice! _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Your comparison demonstrates clearly that Mamiya slightly oversaturates reds while Canon adds some blue/magenta (seen especially well in the background green of the leaves). Do you consider it to be the glass itself or the way each lens directs the AW of the camera? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2971 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2023 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
Red is a challenging color to render well. I find that many many lenses do a poor job of displaying the brilliant red colors of some of the rhododendron flowers in my yard. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1211 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2023 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
jamaeolus wrote: |
Red is a challenging color to render well. I find that many many lenses do a poor job of displaying the brilliant red colors of some of the rhododendron flowers in my yard. |
I agree with part of the above- especially where strong cross lighting is involved.
I have had faint pink wilted store bought roses render semi-dark lipstick red. Undiffused direct flash will do the same thing with some lenses.
Some of my older single coated lenses fall into the above category.
While the images may not have technically "correct" color rendering, the images can still be useful and pleasing.
It all depends on what is wanted out of the final image.
As for Canon glass having a different rendering, yes it does.
That is by no means a put-down of Canon glass- far from it.
Some of the imagery made on film with the FD era lenses is absolutely beautiful, at least in my experience.
When it comes to color accuracy of flowers, I've found moderate back-lighting to be a bit of an advantage, especially with older glass.
I hope to find out more on this in the coming spring when the flower boxes and planters come back out.
-D.S. _________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3245 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2023 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
alex ph wrote: |
Your comparison demonstrates clearly that Mamiya slightly oversaturates reds while Canon adds some blue/magenta (seen especially well in the background green of the leaves). Do you consider it to be the glass itself or the way each lens directs the AW of the camera? |
I just said that is a different red rendition.
Mamiya is the closest to the actual color of the flower.
As for the blue/magenta tinge? It might be the polarizing filter???
Both lenses had polarizing filters: Mamiya - Hoya, Canon - B+W
I've always considered Mamiya having the closest to reality red rendintion when I did these kind of non accurate comparisons.
And to quote jamaeolus red is a chalanging color to render properly and in my experience the most prone to burn.
Here is another Mamiya that is spot on with the colors:
Morning glory
_________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1662
|
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2023 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
Mamiya rendering is something warmish, like almost all my mamiya lenses for 35 mm.
My 55/1,8, 35/2,8, 135/2,8 and 85/2 8 (all SX) have warm rendering. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 775 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2023 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
I always find it helpful to remember than many flowers - especially red and orange ones - are reflecting light far beyond the spectrum visible to the human eye. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 4066 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2023 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
jamaeolus wrote: |
Red is a challenging color to render well. I find that many many lenses do a poor job of displaying the brilliant red colors of some of the rhododendron flowers in my yard. |
Himself wrote: |
red is a challenging color to render properly and in my experience the most prone to burn.
|
When talking about red flowers two things are important to remember:
1) In a Bayer sensor, only 25% of the pixels are red pixels
2) When taking images of a red flower, the green and blue channels often get nearly zero light
As a consequence (especially if the flower cover just a few % of the entire image) the red channel is completely overexposed. This overexposure combined with the low resolution of the red channel (only 6MP in a 24 MP camera!!) results in a inaccurate reproduction of such flowers.
The solution is very simple: Underexposure by 1-2 EV and careful conversion of the RAW data.
S
EDIT if you look at the channels seperatels (R, G, and B), you will see that tha Mamiya has very little information in the blue and green channles compared to the Canon. Thus the Canon shows much more details in the red flower than the Mamiya. _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11053 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2023 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
KEO wrote: |
I always find it helpful to remember than many flowers - especially red and orange ones - are reflecting light far beyond the spectrum visible to the human eye. |
+1 Right -- the sensor responds to the "light far beyond the spectrum visible to the human eye."
stevemark wrote: |
When talking about red flowers two things are important to remember:
1) In a Bayer sensor, only 25% of the pixels are red pixels
2) When taking images of a red flower, the green and blue channels often get nearly zero light
As a consequence (especially if the flower cover just a few % of the entire image) the red channel is completely overexposed. This overexposure combined with the low resolution of the red channel (only 6MP in a 24 MP camera!!) results in a inaccurate reproduction of such flowers.
The solution is very simple: Underexposure by 1-2 EV and careful conversion of the RAW data.
S
EDIT if you look at the channels separate (R, G, and B), you will see that the Mamiya has very little information in the blue and green channels compared to the Canon. Thus the Canon shows much more details in the red flower than the Mamiya. |
+1 _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3245 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2023 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
stevemark wrote: |
1) In a Bayer sensor, only 25% of the pixels are red pixels
|
Quite the opposite of the human eye where the majority of cones are those that perceive the red wavelength. _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RokkorDoctor
Joined: 27 Nov 2021 Posts: 1428 Location: Kent, UK
Expire: 2025-05-01
|
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2023 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
RokkorDoctor wrote:
Himself wrote: |
stevemark wrote: |
1) In a Bayer sensor, only 25% of the pixels are red pixels
|
Quite the opposite of the human eye where the majority of cones are those that perceive the red wavelength. |
Fortunately there are many reasons why you can't compare our eye's retinas to digital camera sensors
And yes, red is a tricky colour for the common sensors. Stephan and I have had that discussion before, although in the end that turned out to be me failing to notice a PP issue with the Photoshop levels adjustment and conversion from AdobeRGB to sRGB profile, despite me having underexposed the original shot on purpose as Stephan suggested to do.
Hint: if you do a levels correction on an AdobeRGB shot before you convert from AdobeRGB to sRGB, make sure you double-check the red channel for saturation after the conversion. Even when the red channel is not saturated in AdobeRGB colour space after the levels correction, then converting to sRGB can oversaturate the red channel. In my experience when there is a danger of red channel saturation you are better off doing the AdobeRGB to sRGB conversion first, and then do a levels adjustment for exposure.
My colour space math isn't good enough to explain this (well, it's non-existent really), but I suspect this has to do with the AdobeRGB colour space having a much wider gamut in particularly the CIE green coordinates compared to the sRGB space. Conversion to the sRGB colour space then resulting in extra saturation in the red channel maybe has something to to with the chosen rendering intent and with white point compensation during this conversion. _________________ Mark
SONY A7S, A7RII + dust-sealed modded Novoflex/Fotodiox/Rayqual MD-NEX adapters
Minolta SR-1, SRT-101/303, XD7/XD11, XGM, X700
Bronica SQAi
Ricoh GX100
Minolta majority of all Rokkor SR/AR/MC/MD models made
Sigma 14mm/3.5 for SR mount
Tamron SP 60B 300mm/2.8 (Adaptall)
Samyang T-S 24mm/3.5 (Nikon mount, DIY converted to SR mount)
Schneider-Kreuznach PC-Super-Angulon 28mm/2.8 (SR mount)
Bronica PS 35/40/50/65/80/110/135/150/180/200/250mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|