View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:13 am Post subject: Focal 28mm -- Surprising Lens |
|
|
David wrote:
So I won an eBay auction the other week for a Hanimex 35 SL that included a Focal 28mm, Hanimex 55mm, and Soligor 90-230mm lens. I figured the Focal would be a quick resell as it's a brand I'm not a huge fan of. So I took it out to Lime Ridge to get some shots to use in my eBay listing. Upon reviewing the photos, I'm not going to sell this lens. The lens has an interesting sticker on the side: 20-06-50. Does that indicate that the lens was made 61 years ago? It is an M42 mount.
Here is the lens:
Here are some of the shots:
Mt. Diablo at Sunset
A blooming thistle silhouette
Grass, but more importantly check the bokeh, which is not unpleasant
A blooming thistle
A succulent of some type
A yellow flower -- check out that fantastic sun glare
Some kinda spiney plant. The coloration was NOT done post-process.
A thistle at f2.8 (wide open)
Same thistle at f16 (fully stopped)
This lens has absolutely changed my opinion about Focal. This is an absolutely amazing lens. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Willem
Joined: 08 Jun 2011 Posts: 280 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Willem wrote:
looks great!
the thistle silhouette is my favourite. _________________
www.willemvs.wordpress.com
Canon EOS 500D, Canon Powershot SX10IS, 2 x Asahi Pentax spotmatic F, iPod touch
AF lenses:
Canon 18-55 kit lens, Canon 1.8/50mm, Canon EF 85 1.8 USM, Canon EF-S 10-22
MF lenses:
SMC Takumar 1.8/55 (2x)
S-M-C Takumars 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 3.5/35, 4/50 Macro, 4/100 Macro, 2.5/135 (v2), 4/200
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
casualcollector
Joined: 01 Aug 2008 Posts: 749 Location: Spaced out on Florida's Space Coast
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
casualcollector wrote:
A chain store I worked in back in the 1975-77 period carried this lens under the Continental Optics brand. I recall the manufacturer being Makina Optical Co. I believe your lens to be about 35 years old. _________________ In Search Of "R" Serial Soligors
Found: 135/2.8 #R407660, 200/4 #R405526, 300/5.5 #R411127 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
Great stuff. This is exactly why many of us started using MF lenses as a cheap alternativ to modern gear. I'm really pleased it has hit the spot for you. I believe this lens has been branded with many different names, even Helios! You may find that other Focal branded lenses may have been made by someone else, and thus might not be up to the same standards, however. But that's all part of the fun!! _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
natebarnz
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 331 Location: Los Angeles / Tucson
Expire: 2013-01-23
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
natebarnz wrote:
What region of the world are these photos taken in? Reminds me of AZ/NM. _________________ 500D / SPII / FTn / Contax D / 137MA / Contaflex
Contax 28/2 - 35/1.4 - 35/2.8 - 45/2.8 - 50/1.4 - 100/3.5 - 135/2.8
CZJ 20/4 - 35/2.8 - 50/2.8 - 58/2 - 135/3.5
Rokkor PG 58/1.2 - PF 58/1.4 - X 85/1.7
Nikkor S 55/1.2 - H 85/1.8 - P.C. 55/3.5
Helios 44-2 58/2 Meyer Oreston 50/1.8
Elmarit-R 90/2.8 Sears 55/1.4
--> Visit My Picasa Galleries <-- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
Northern California. It's a desert here, too, but no one wants to admit it. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eddieitman
Joined: 12 Apr 2011 Posts: 1246 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eddieitman wrote:
That looks a very decent lens, and love the thistle picture _________________ My web site www.digital-darkroom.weebly.com
Life is like a camera. Focus on what's important, capture the good times, develop from the negatives and if things don't work out, just take another shot. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 1120 Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
Hmmm, I just checked my lens bins, and dang me but I have the same! In M42, #540547, with a sticker on the side: 20-06-50(A) (the A is inside a circle). My database says I paid US$6 for it, shipped. It's one of a batch of 28/2.8's that haven't yet made it to my Lens-Of-The-Day rotation.
Made by Makina, you say casualcollector? Others in that batch include an M42 Makinon 28/2.8 #796472 (US$8, with original case and caps) that looks very very similar -- slightly different maker's lettering placement and gnurled ring, and no side sticker, otherwise identical build, same weight, same 55mm thread, same aperture+focus numbering. I have twins! I guess I need to use them someday... _________________ Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |
|
Back to top |
|
|
buerokratiehasser
Joined: 12 Jun 2011 Posts: 470
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
buerokratiehasser wrote:
Any relation to Albinar?
My Super-Albinar 28/2.8 looks pretty similar. It seems to have the same "blocky" font (Nr. 755264) with funny f = 1 : 2.8 spacing, the same "twin" screws on the M/A ring...
However "MC" is in white, not yellow, numbers in ft are over the distances in m, ft are orange, m are white; there are no silver rings on the focusing rubber; the distance scale is flat, not conically extending in girdth to the focusing rubber. This is probably the worst evidence against these being the same lens; however, the distance scale basically is part of the focusing ring, so maybe they just added a little to make it thicker.
Makes a nice loupe for diapositives. Saw no "sticker" and took it for a budget lens from the 70s |
|
Back to top |
|
|
quicksilver86
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 Posts: 39
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
quicksilver86 wrote:
I read the title: a surprising 28mm lens and I though immediately about a lens from a friend of mine.
He discovered this 28mm from Kinor, an unknown lens manufacture and this one is a very good one.
It's sharp, it's well build, it's quite fast, it have a gorgeous bokeh and it's funny to use in sunlight because of it's funny flare.
It's also has 0.3 meters MFD !!
And surprise! Your one is a Kinor too! I had one too year ago.
If you wait I'll prove that |
|
Back to top |
|
|
quicksilver86
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 Posts: 39
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
quicksilver86 wrote:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cheekygeek
Joined: 05 Aug 2008 Posts: 183
|
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 4:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
cheekygeek wrote:
Finding little baubles that "trip our triggers" is part of the fun of accumulating manual focus lenses. I also like the mostly-sillouetted thistle shot the best. Well done!
I'm NOT a big fan of what I call "weird-ass bokeh" which is what I see in some of the other pics. I'm not a fan of Ken Rockwell, but he has a good explaination of exactly what this lens shows: http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/bokeh.htm. I agree with those who say that hard and busy edges (in the bokeh) distract viewers from the main subject. To me, bokeh is like the instrumental score of a movie. If you notice it too much then it is taking center stage away from the actors/plot/storyline.
But one of the great things about any art is that it is subjective and what two people like may be entirely different from one another. Almost any lens excels at some things and is not great at others. Figuring out when to use a particular lens over another is also part of the fun. _________________ DSLR: Pentax K-3 II, D-BG5 grip, SLR: Pentax SP500, Pentax SP, Pentax SP II, Pentax Spotmatic F, MX, ME-Super, Super Program, pZ-1
Lenses:
Tele-Takumar: 300mm f6.3; 200mm f5.6; Takumar 200mm f3.5; Takumar 135mm f3.5; Macro-Takumar 50mm f4 (1:1)Super Takumars: 24mm f3.5, 55mm f2.0, 135mm f3.5; S-M-C Takumar 35mm f3.5, 50mm Macro f4.0 (1:2), 50mm f1.4, 135mm f2.5 (v2); Pentax SMC K 17mm f4 fisheye; Pentax-A: 50mm f1.4, 35-70mm f4; Pentacon: 50mm f1.8; Spiratone 85mm f1.8 (y/s); Vivitar: 85mm f1.8 preset; Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon Electric 35mm f2,4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|