View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2023 6:58 pm Post subject: F-Theta (laser equipment) as taking lenses |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
F-Theta lenses are used in machines for laser scanning and engraving. For this purpose they are produced following high standards applied to distortion, CA, temperature tolerance, coating quality. All this sounds intriguing. As for their focal length, it corresponds to tele in "common" photo universe, varying from around 100mm to 450mm.
They are also quite large which is not such a big advantage, but some of them are telecentric, which means a very even distribution of sharpness all over the visual field.
Second hand or offered by Chinese makers they enter pretty accessible budgets, of circa 60-80 euros or dollars per unit.
I wonder if some of you, experimenting with printing, enlarging, engraving and projection glass, fell into one of F-Theta lenses and out of curiosity tried to adapt it.
Datasheets spread in the net sound contradictory concerning the back focal length (flange distance) of the F-Thetas. According to some of them, this B measure varies from 11mm to 22.5mm. Not that great, being mostly too short. According to others, it varies from 194.62mm to 486.66mm. Too long! Such a fork may concern different types and applications. And still there must be some standards in the industry, to let them fit the same machines. So, the adaptability is a question, and I am not prepared well enough to conclude it from the datasheets.
Long story short, do you have any experience and maybe ideas about the adaptability of these lenses to our photography equipment?
Images credit: Ronar-Smith web site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simple.joy
Joined: 30 May 2022 Posts: 644
|
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 2:29 pm Post subject: Re: F-Theta (laser equipment) as taking lenses |
|
|
simple.joy wrote:
alex ph wrote: |
F-Theta lenses are used in machines for laser scanning and engraving. For this purpose they are produced following high standards applied to distortion, CA, temperature tolerance, coating quality. All this sounds intriguing. As for their focal length, it corresponds to tele in "common" photo universe, varying from around 100mm to 450mm.
They are also quite large which is not such a big advantage, but some of them are telecentric, which means a very even distribution of sharpness all over the visual field.
Second hand or offered by Chinese makers they enter pretty accessible budgets, of circa 60-80 euros or dollars per unit.
I wonder if some of you, experimenting with printing, enlarging, engraving and projection glass, fell into one of F-Theta lenses and out of curiosity tried to adapt it.
Datasheets spread in the net sound contradictory concerning the back focal length (flange distance) of the F-Thetas. According to some of them, this B measure varies from 11mm to 22.5mm. Not that great, being mostly too short. According to others, it varies from 194.62mm to 486.66mm. Too long! Such a fork may concern different types and applications. And still there must be some standards in the industry, to let them fit the same machines. So, the adaptability is a question, and I am not prepared well enough to conclude it from the datasheets.
Long story short, do you have any experience and maybe ideas about the adaptability of these lenses to our photography equipment?
Images credit: Ronar-Smith web site |
I'm sorry that I'm not able to provide any answer to your question, but I wondered about the reasons for the lack of any attempts to adapt these lenses before as well and just assumed, that they must be unfit for it in one or another way. I'll let you know if I ever happen to get one of these and try them or find a source explaning the reasons. _________________ ---
Manual lens enthusiast
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Usually, these lenses are only corrected for a narrow bandwidth ofthe light spectrum, that can make them rather poor lenses for conventional photography, but without actually trying them, who knows. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2023 12:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Thank you, fellows, for your substantial reactions. "Hardware" limitations might certainly explain the lack of posts reporting successful adaptation. Another reason might consist in a relatively young age of the market for such lenses which has not become yet the field where ML photographers stepped in.
I'll keep an eye on the second hand market. If an offer under 30 euros appears, I'll be tempted to give it a try. For the moment, I have no friend or contact around who has passion for laser engraving. That could be the best way to reach a lens to try, and before to have a well grounded opinion on its applicability. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11058 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2023 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Iirc the mounting distance from back of lens is very short even for mild.
Lenses must be flat field and telecentric, used within specific distance range. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16664 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2023 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Used a few for 365nm and used an external iris as such need to be stopped down for an acceptable result - not bad actually!
And I found one from Zeiss Jena, a f1.4/100mm which I used for some tests, called it "soft focus" as those results looked like that, quite a bit CA as expected but I liked it...but I don't have it anymore I think.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums/72157671100239984 _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2023 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
This is most interesting, Klaus! The images are very stylish, thanks to the combination of sharpness and glow. Thank you for sharing.
Could you focus your Zeiss only close up, under 1m, as your flickr album shows?
Otherwise, do you have some tests to show from your other F-Theta lenses, maybe even "quick'n'dirty", to see how they render? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011 Posts: 577 Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2023 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
I borrowed one from a friend once; spectacular "italian flag" colours; so it is obviously only correected for the hgh oower laser frequency. Stacking two ordinary filters to get a reasonabloe B&W did not help,
I presume a sharp cutoff filter for the design freqyency would be ideal for specialized snaps.
p. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2023 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Really interesting! Have you kept some original shots, to see the rendering? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011 Posts: 577 Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2023 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
Immeediately discarded.
p. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2023 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|