Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 6:18 am Post subject: Effect of cleaning marks/spots on rear lens? |
|
|
youngcoby wrote:
Hello,
in several topics, the bad state of a front lens has been well documented. It's effect on picture quality is rather small.
Can the same be said for spots or cleaning marks on the rear lens? I guess this is more critical (closer to the sensor/film, together with a smaller total area of the lens), but I'm not sure.
Someone could help me out here?
Filip _________________
Digital cams: Pentax K5, Pentax K200D, Canon 10D (mf), Nikon D80 (af), Olympus SP570UZ, Olympus C70 (C7000)
Takumar: 24/3.5 - 28/3.5 - 35/3.5 - 50/1.4 - 55/1.8 - 85/1.9 - 105/2.8 - 135/2.5 - 135/3.5 - 200/4.0
Carl Zeiss T*: Distagon 28/2.8 MM - Tessar 45/2.8 MM - Planar 100/2 MM - Sonnar 40-80/3.5 AE
Jupiter: 37A - Meyer Orestegor 200/4.0
Coming up for sale:
Leica R: Summicron 35/2 - Summicron 50/2 - Elmarit 135/2.8 - Elmarit 180/2.8
C/Y Carl Zeiss T*: Distagon 35/2.8 AE - Planar 50/1.4 AE - Planar 50/1.7 MM - Sonnar 135/2.8 MM - Sonnar 180/2.8 AE
C/Y Yashica ML: 24/2.8 - 28/2.8 - 35/2.8 - 50/1.4 - 50/1.7 - 50/1.9 - 50/2.0 - 55/2.8 (macro) - 55/4.0 (macro) - 135/2.8 - 200/4.0 - 300/5.6 - 80-200/4.0
C/Y Kiron: 105/2.8 (macro) - 28-210/4-5.6 zoom; Tokina: 80-200/4.0
M42: Jupiter: 9 - 11A - 21M; Helios: 44-4; Mir: 1b; Mamiya SX: 35/2.8 - 50/2.0 - 55/1.8 - 135/2.8; Petri: 28/2.8
Nikon: 24/2.8 - 28/3.5 - 105/2.5 - Vivitar: 100/3.5 macro
QBM Rollei: 50/1.8 - Sonnar 85/2.8;
Minolta: 50/1.7 - Vivitar: 28/2.8 Close focus
Tamron Adaptall: 300/5.6;
P6: Volna 3 |