View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3439 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
Bob van Sikorski wrote: |
all later minolta SLRs are small. not SR-T series (which is bigger), but even my X700 is ok with 45/2.0 |
Are not you forgetting my dear XE-1 (XE-5, XE-7)?
Just before the XD and XG models a last big and heavy one.
If you want a small body, keep away from that one. If you want a great Minolta camera, that is one to remind.
Scroll down to see Nessters post: http://forum.mflenses.com/free-wallpaper-open-thread-t41787.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bob van Sikorski
Joined: 12 Jan 2009 Posts: 287 Location: Czech Republic
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bob van Sikorski wrote:
sorry, my mistake _________________ Rokkor (MD 45/2.0, MC PF 50/1.7), Porst Color Reflex MC Auto 55/1.2, Jupiter 135/3.5
Minolta X-700, Minolta Dynax 4, Flexaret IIa (later version), Flexaret VI
Voigtländer Avus 9x12 (1927-1935 version)
Epson V500 + VueScan/Linux + RawTherapee 4.x + GIMP/wavelett sharpen plugin
Meopta Magnifax III (up to 6x9) + Opemus III (up to 6x6), Rodenstock Rodagon 50/2.8, Meopta Anaret 105/4.5
Proud user of czech films! company homepage: foma.cz, buy here: fomafoto.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
kuuan wrote: |
the XG1 is the first camera I bought ( new in 1979 )
not as compact as a OM it's nevertheless relatively small and very light.
Very well proportioned and simple lay out makes it's use very easy and comfortable. |
Andreas, I found one, though it doesn't have the f1.4 lens, i'm sure results will be OK:
Click here to see on Ebay |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
congratulations Bill! I hope you will like it! I had not mentioned that one cannot expect build quality of older, heavier cameras, but that's 'natural' for these later, lighter cameras
The Rokkor-X f1.4/50 is a fantastic lens, but I am sure so is this Rokkor-X f1.7/50 and they are full metal! here some samples: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1042&message=40794288&changemode=1 _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Andreas, thanks! I've seen some of Jussi's photos with the f1.7 which had excellent IQ,
so hope for at least passable results.
Forgot to add, nice samples on DPReview, Andreas! I finally decided to order the NEX C3, due
to the big EXAKTA gap in the NX adapters. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RDM
Joined: 08 Jul 2012 Posts: 27 Location: New York State, USA
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:09 am Post subject: Please don't perpetuate this mistake. |
|
|
RDM wrote:
Katastrofo wrote: |
skida wrote: |
I have both an XG-1 and an X300S. Both are compact, but the X300S is lightest as it is a Polycarbonate body and I use it more than the XG-1. |
Thanks, the X300s is dead center what I wanted. Something with the size and heft of a point and shoot, but with the Rokkor
pancake, will give me DOF as well. Bought this Chinese clone:
Click here to see on Ebay |
Please for the love of God do not get confused and start to think the Rokkor 45mm f2.0 is a pancake lens. Its not even close . Calling it a Pancake is something that started on eBay about a decade and a half ago. Most likely an Idiot seller on eBay used it in his description and other idiots seen it and started to copy it for their own description on the sale of the same lens. Minolta did make a pancake 45mm lens. It was an F2.8 and it was actually less than half the length of the 45mm f2.0 lens.
The Rokkor 45mm 2.0 is actually quite far from being a Pancake. And is obvious if you ever seen a pancake or compared it to other lenses.
Even the Minolta Rokkor-PF 55mm 1.9 lens is smaller than the 45mm 2.0 lens. If you look at any other camera systems and see what they market as a pancake lens, you will see that the 45mm pancake for Nikon or C/Y or Pentax mount is about half the length of the Rokkor 45mm 2.0. The Minolta Auto Rokkor-TD 45mm 2.8 lens is the only lens Minolta ever marketed as a pancake lens.
Top center is the Minolta Pancake and the top right is the large 45mm f2.0. All are Pancake lenses except the top right Minolta 45mm 2.0 lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
I've also seen the Minolta MD 50/2 often advertised as an pancake. It's a pretty compact lens (and very good) but indeed also not a real pancake (about the same size as the 45/2)
The MD 50/2 one of the best if the not the best Minolta MD lens. Highly recommended! _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language)
Last edited by ForenSeil on Fri Sep 28, 2012 4:09 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Thanks for the bombast, RDM, I stand corrected. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RDM
Joined: 08 Jul 2012 Posts: 27 Location: New York State, USA
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RDM wrote:
Katastrofo wrote: |
Thanks for the bombast, RDM, I stand corrected. |
Sorry if it seamed like i was blasting ya... Just wanted to save you from misinformation, and any future readers of this thread. It is a pet peeve of mine, because I now can never really do a eBay search for the real 45mm Pancake lens. It is a lens I been wanting for quite some time . I use to read postings from people that would find them from time to time and get them for under a hundred dollars, but that was over ten years ago .. so I have always tried to search for it but I noticed more and more were calling the other 45 a pancake thus messing up my search results..lol But it also made me wonder about their intelligence because knowing other lenses that have been called a Pancake, comparatively it was Quite large, More like a Biscuit
So it also tells me the sellers are not really camera knowledgeable, despite selling large volumes of camera gear. I only recently found someone selling a pancake but he wants a ridiculous amount of money for it. Also its not an Auto diaphragm lens; its a preset.
And yea if you like compactness you can also try a the 55mm lens I mentioned. And if you plan on using this as a walking around camera and would like another lens or two to have In your pocket, you should consider the Small (for a telephoto) Minolta MD 3.5/135mm. Its a pretty light and compact telephoto. And if you like zooms look at some Sigma UC zoom models. The are slow but sharp; great for using on the camera during a mid day stroll. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Yes, after seeing it mounted on the camera, though somewhat snub-nosed, is no pancake.
Thanks for the tips on the lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Pancakes, well, they are actually few and far between, the Pentax M one is perhaps the most common I see for sale on ebay.
The Minolta 2/45 is small, same size as the Konica 1.8/40, the Pentacon PB 2.4/50 and Yashica ML 2/50 are the same size too, I had em all, all good, but in all cases the full size 50s of the same maker were better. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|