View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:23 pm Post subject: Converto Tamron 2.8/135 matched TC (full 1962 kit) |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
I have had the old preset T-mount Tamron model 680 (ca. 1962) in both Soligor and Tamron brands for some time. But I never had the full kit as originally sold, with the matched TC.
Last two have the assembled lens beside the original Converto Tamron 4.5/135 of 1958.
This 135 lens was apparently usually sold as a set with a matched teleconverter, just like the original Converto-Tamron. Its obviously an attempt at upgrading the original and quite successful product. It was also designed to use the then-new standard T-mounts; the model 680 seems to have been one of the first T-mount lenses.
I have documented the basic model 680 before, here I just want to comment on the teleconverter. Some oddities - It is a T-mount TC, it can only be used with T-mount lenses. Its actually a 1.67x TC, but max aperture is just f/5.5 as marked on both the TC and the dual aperture scale on the lens. One would expect a 1.67x TC on an f/2.8 lens to give a max aperture of f/4.7, not 5.5. The max aperture has been deliberately limited in this, I suspect to maintain decent performance at all apertures. The original Converto Tamron did not require this aperture limitation, but then the basic lens was just an f/4.5.
In use, its a bit of an awkward combination. It is of course impossible to use this with any other non-T-mount lens, so one needs to bring along another TC for other lenses if one wants a TC for them. As TC's go, its huge. The combination is quite long and heavy for what it is, I have plenty of 200mm lenses that are smaller and lighter. As usual with a TC, effective minimum focus of the combination is much improved over what would be a fixed prime, so its a good alternative as a close-focus lens, without the hassle of extension rings. I find this one is perfect for flowers because of the focal length and close focus.
Performance is quite good really. The limited maximum aperture, probably, makes wide-open performance exceptional for a TC (still not great, but usable). Stopped down to f/8 its as sharp as I can use on my 6 megapixel Pentax. No problem with flare or contrast. An excellent choice for walking in a garden.
The bird -
crop -
_________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bruce
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 842 Location: Boston, Ma USA
Expire: 2014-11-22
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bruce wrote:
Why they call Boston <----> San Fransico twin city's beats me?
luisalegria, want some snow?
your the only one posting flowers beginning of January
KEEP THEM COMING! _________________ Digital: Canon 40d & 5DmkII, Film: Hasselblad 203fe/Zeiss 80/2.8 cfe
Adapters for EOS: Cy; M42; Zenit39; Exakta; LeicaR; OlympusOM; PK; Nikon; Rollei35; Retina; Adaptal; P-6 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mike Deep
Joined: 25 Oct 2008 Posts: 323 Location: Upstate New York
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mike Deep wrote:
Hey - That's not the bird! What are you trying to pull here? _________________ Rocket Launch Photography
Olympus: 24/2.8 MC, 28/3.5, 28/2.8 MC, 35/2.8, 50/3.5, 50/1.8 MC, 50/1.4 MC, 35-70/3.6, 75-150/4
Nikon: C 24/2.8, AI-S 28/2.8, K 35/2, K 35/2.8, F 55/3.5, C 55/1.2, AI 85/2, 105/2.5 (5/3), 105/2.5 (5/4), F 135/2.8, F 200/4, No. 5T
Pentax: 28/3.5, 35/3.5, 50/1.4 (8/6), 50/1.4 (7/6), M 50/1.4, SMC 55/1.8, 105/2.8, SMC 135/3.5, 150/4
Tamron: SP 17/3.5 151B, 28/2.5, 135/2.8 T-135, SP 300/2.8 60B, SP 35-80/2.8-3.8 01A, 80-210/3.8-4 103A, SP 1.4x TC 140F, SP 2x TC 01F
Vivitar: 24/2 (Kino), 28/2 (Kino), 50/1.4 (Cosina), S1 90/2.5 (Tokina), S1 28-80/2.8-3.5 (Kino), 70-150/3.8 (Kino), S1 70-210/3.5 (Kino), 2x Macro TC
Etc: Yashica 3.5cm/2.8, Fujinon 50/1.4, Yashica ML 50/1.4, Tomioka Yashinon 55/1.2, Mamiya/Sekor 55/1.7, Sigma 90/2.8
That's a lot of 50s. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 2:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
My children would dearly like some snow; in San Francisco thats a once-a-decade event. I have to take them skiing again one of these days.
I'm "on vacation", so I'm not near my usual friends at the pier. I'm afraid the humble pigeon will have to suffice today. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Seele
Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 742 Location: Sydney Australia
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Seele wrote:
I had one of these kits marked "Hanimex-Tamron Twin-Tele", and then found an original box in which they were sold but it was not the one which matched the lens, marked just "Tamron". The velvet-lined box housed the lens and the converter separately, with a separate spot for the T-mount, indicating that it was sold as a complete outfit. The box was made out of poor quality cardboard and basically disintegrated, so I took it apart, built a replica one from quality boards, and then had the original cover and innards put back on: bookbinding skills can come in useful at times! It was then sold to a collector as a complete kit - who admitted that he wanted the box more than the lenses! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|