View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
motleypixel
Joined: 12 May 2010 Posts: 135 Location: Austin, TX USA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 8:47 pm Post subject: Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f3.5 M42 mount ? |
|
|
motleypixel wrote:
Hey gang,
Considering picking up a Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f3.5 with M42 mount to use an M42 to EOS adapter on my Canon 5DMK2. Any thoughts on potential issue with this lens and the performance of this lens?
Here's a shot of the lens on the camera:
Thanks,
Roy _________________ -Roy
T h e M o t l e y P i x e l |
|
Back to top |
|
|
exaklaus
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 1633 Location: Niederrhein, Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
exaklaus wrote:
That is not M42, it is an Exakta bayonet mount lens on that picture.
Klaus _________________ my Ebay auctions
Canon 5D II,
Fuji GW690III, Fuji G617, Fujifilm X-E1
Bessaflex TM
Tachihara 4"x5"
Summilux-R 1:1,4/50
Canon FD 85mm 1:1,2
Color-Heliar 75mm F2.5 SL
www.autoselbstfotografie.de
www.classic-cameras-and-lenses.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
motleypixel
Joined: 12 May 2010 Posts: 135 Location: Austin, TX USA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
motleypixel wrote:
Thank you very much. This is very good to know.
-Roy _________________ -Roy
T h e M o t l e y P i x e l |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pat donnelly
Joined: 19 Jan 2010 Posts: 666 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 11:20 am Post subject: 3.5 50 Pancake Russki |
|
|
pat donnelly wrote:
I have a few of these. Got one in 39mm as well as the far more common M42. They were so cheap at one stage. The big advantage is the size. Tessar, so good performance. Build quality can vary as Comrades might have had a hangover on a Monday.
Much scarcer these days on fleabay, but I got 3 for $40 inc postage, a week ago. Direct from the Motherland. Actually Ukraine.
It will look odd on your camera and not be as useful as a wider 50mm. Why do you want one? _________________ ---------------------------------
EP-1, E-410, E-300, D100, D1,
C-Mt: 25mm 1.9, 75mm 1.4, 75mm 1.3, 75mm 1.9, Ultra wides, one inch sensor, 20+ c-mount zooms
OM 350mm f2.8, Nikkor 180 f2.8, Exa 180 f2.8,
Tamrons: 90mm f2.5, 500mm f8 x3, 135 f2.5, 200 f3.5, 24mm 2.5, 28mm 2.5 x8,
FD 500mm mirror lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
motleypixel
Joined: 12 May 2010 Posts: 135 Location: Austin, TX USA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
motleypixel wrote:
Thanks for the help. It's just the nostalgia of it really, well to a degree. I wish I have more expendable money and time as I would buy up all the 50mmihs lenses and test them all.
Right now I plan to do a controlled shoot-out for center/corner sharpness, contrast, and color of the following lenses:
Minolta MC-Rokkor PF 58/1.4
Oly G-Zuiko 50/1.4
Super Takumar 55/1.8
Canon EF 50/1.8 MkII
Canon EF 50/1.4
I would like to add a few more such as the SMC tak 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8, Yashica Yashinon-DX 50/1.4 and a few more popular ones too.
In a few week I will be adding the Rokkor-X 50/1.4, and the Yashica Yashinon-DX 50/1.4.
Thanks,
Roy _________________ -Roy
T h e M o t l e y P i x e l |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Univer
Joined: 30 Jun 2009 Posts: 282
|
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:33 pm Post subject: Re: 3.5 50 Pancake Russki |
|
|
Univer wrote:
pat donnelly wrote: |
...snip...
I have a few of these. Got one in 39mm as well as the far more common M42.
...snip... |
Hi,
Just curious: which camera is the M39 Tessar for?
Cheers,
Jon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pat donnelly
Joined: 19 Jan 2010 Posts: 666 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:59 am Post subject: M39 Tessar |
|
|
pat donnelly wrote:
John
No idea! I intend to use it with an adapter on my ep1, some day. I presume it was originally for a CCCP RF? Or do I mean LTM39? _________________ ---------------------------------
EP-1, E-410, E-300, D100, D1,
C-Mt: 25mm 1.9, 75mm 1.4, 75mm 1.3, 75mm 1.9, Ultra wides, one inch sensor, 20+ c-mount zooms
OM 350mm f2.8, Nikkor 180 f2.8, Exa 180 f2.8,
Tamrons: 90mm f2.5, 500mm f8 x3, 135 f2.5, 200 f3.5, 24mm 2.5, 28mm 2.5 x8,
FD 500mm mirror lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57850 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 3:56 pm Post subject: Re: M39 Tessar |
|
|
Attila wrote:
pat donnelly wrote: |
John
No idea! I intend to use it with an adapter on my ep1, some day. I presume it was originally for a CCCP RF? Or do I mean LTM39? |
Zenit 3M has M39 mount and it is an SLR camera. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Univer
Joined: 30 Jun 2009 Posts: 282
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 6:01 pm Post subject: Re: M39 Tessar |
|
|
Univer wrote:
pat donnelly wrote: |
John
No idea! I intend to use it with an adapter on my ep1, some day. I presume it was originally for a CCCP RF? Or do I mean LTM39? |
Wait, wait...now I'm confused. (I'm rather easily confused.) Are we talking Tessars or Industars?
There were 5cm Tessars in M40 mount (Praktiflex) - I've got one of those - but I can't call to mind an M39 or L39 5cm Tessar at the moment. (Not to say that there isn't such a creature.)
Cheers,
Jon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nemesis101
Joined: 25 Mar 2008 Posts: 2050 Location: Oregon USA
Expire: 2015-01-22
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:28 am Post subject: Re: M39 Tessar |
|
|
nemesis101 wrote:
M40 mount?
or M42 mount or
And you thought you were confused? lol
Doug
Univer wrote: |
pat donnelly wrote: |
John
No idea! I intend to use it with an adapter on my ep1, some day. I presume it was originally for a CCCP RF? Or do I mean LTM39? |
Wait, wait...now I'm confused. (I'm rather easily confused.) Are we talking Tessars or Industars?
There were 5cm Tessars in M40 mount (Praktiflex) - I've got one of those - but I can't call to mind an M39 or L39 5cm Tessar at the moment. (Not to say that there isn't such a creature.)
Cheers,
Jon |
_________________ Lenses and cameras:
Amateurs worry about equipment
Pros worry about money,
Masters worry about light. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pat donnelly
Joined: 19 Jan 2010 Posts: 666 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 4:14 am Post subject: Tessar or tessar? |
|
|
pat donnelly wrote:
I also recently came across one on fleabay, but it did not look as deep as mine.
I will post asap ...... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pat donnelly
Joined: 19 Jan 2010 Posts: 666 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Univer
Joined: 30 Jun 2009 Posts: 282
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Univer wrote:
@nemesis101: The original Praktiflex camera was M40 screwmount. I haven't been able to determine the precise register distance, but it's shorter than that of the M42 screwmount that followed it. There are online references suggesting that the register distance is the same, but my own experience - confirmed by the proprietor of the marvelous site www.dresdner-kameras.de - indicates otherwise.
@pat donnelly: The Industar-50 was made in both SLR and rangefinder versions. The first two linked Industars are M39/Zenit SLR mount (note that an Industar-50 is M39, while an Industar-50-2 is M42). The third linked lens is L39 (rangefinder) mount. And yes, all the Industar-50s, so far as I know, are Tessar designs; but I believe the term "Tessar" itself is reserved for Zeiss (or Zeiss-licensed) products.
And yes, it all gets rather confusing!
Cheers,
Jon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pat donnelly
Joined: 19 Jan 2010 Posts: 666 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pat donnelly wrote:
Jon
Thank you! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|