View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Krisgage
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 681 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 3:25 pm Post subject: Carl Zeiss Jena brass lenses |
|
|
Krisgage wrote:
I found these two brass lens at my usual antique shop. I did a batter trade plus top up for the lenses. I wish to know more about the lenses, for example, which camera bodies it used to mount, the mount, when the lenses made. Thanks
1. Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Tevidon 2/10. Very heavy lens with aperature and focusing rings or mechanisms.
_________________ Photos and Lenses Journal
http://krisgage.livejournal.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Krisgage
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 681 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Krisgage wrote:
2. Carl Zeiss Jena 1.4,5 F-25cm DRP. This lens got front and rear glasses and the aperature blades sandwiched between them. I think its for the field type camera.
_________________ Photos and Lenses Journal
http://krisgage.livejournal.com
Last edited by Krisgage on Mon May 11, 2009 1:20 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sevo
Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 1189 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2012-12-03
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sevo wrote:
The former is a GDR TV camera lens - some of them are crap, some of them are considered desirable among film students, but I don't know about that particular one. The latter is a 1913 plate camera barrel lens - still ok for large format with a slight vintage look, but at a resolution somewhere in the 10-20lp/mm it is not quite up to hooking it up to 35mm or a even smaller digital sensor unless for special effects. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Krisgage
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 681 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 1:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Krisgage wrote:
Sevo wrote: |
The former is a GDR TV camera lens - some of them are crap, some of them are considered desirable among film students, but I don't know about that particular one. The latter is a 1913 plate camera barrel lens - still ok for large format with a slight vintage look, but at a resolution somewhere in the 10-20lp/mm it is not quite up to hooking it up to 35mm or a even smaller digital sensor unless for special effects. |
Hi, thanks for your explaination. By the way, what does DRP and DDR means ? _________________ Photos and Lenses Journal
http://krisgage.livejournal.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Krisgage
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 681 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 7:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Krisgage wrote:
is this lenses mountable on DSLR _________________ Photos and Lenses Journal
http://krisgage.livejournal.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
Krisgage wrote: |
Sevo wrote: |
The former is a GDR TV camera lens - some of them are crap, some of them are considered desirable among film students, but I don't know about that particular one. The latter is a 1913 plate camera barrel lens - still ok for large format with a slight vintage look, but at a resolution somewhere in the 10-20lp/mm it is not quite up to hooking it up to 35mm or a even smaller digital sensor unless for special effects. |
Hi, thanks for your explaination. By the way, what does DRP and DDR means ? |
DDR is Deutsche Demokratische Republik, also known as GDR (German Democratic Republic) or most commonly among English-speakers, East Germany
DRP seems to stand for Deutsches Reichs Patent, or Imperial German Patent - but that's just what Google told me _________________
Canon EOS 5D / EOS 40D
Carl Zeiss Jena: Flektogon 2.8/20, 2.4/35, 2.8/35, Pancolar 2/50, MC 1.8/50, MC 1.8/80, Triotar 4/135, Tessar 2.8/50, S 4/135 1Q, S 3.5/135, Sonnar 3.5/135 MC, 2.8/180, Biotar 2/5,8cm, 2/58, 1.5/75
Carl Zeiss: Distagon 2/28 T*, 1.4/35 T*, Ultron 1.8/50, Tessar 2.8/50, Planar 1.4/50 T* MM, 1.7/50 T* MM, 1.4/85 T* AEG, Sonnar 2.8/135 T*
Asahi Optical Co.: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 2.8/120, 2.5/135 I & II, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4/300, 5.6/400, 4/45-125, 4.5/85-210, Super-Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4.5/70-150, Fish-Eye-Takumar 4/17, Macro-Takumar 4/50, Super-Macro Takumar 4/50, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar 4/50, 4/100, Bellows-Takumar 4/100, Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 3.5/50, 2.4/58, 3.5/100, Asahi-Kogaku Tele-Takumar 3.5/135, Auto-Takumar 2.3/35, 3.5/35, 1.8/55, 1.8/55 (Zebra), 2/55, 2.2/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, Takumar 4/35, 2.2/55, 2/58, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 3.5/200, 5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 5.6/200, 6.3/300, SMC Takumar 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, SMC-M 1.4/50, 1.7/50, 2/50
Tomioka: Tominon 2/5cm, Auto-Chinon 3.5/21, 1.4/55, Auto-Yashinon DS-M 1.2/55 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
Oh, and congratulations on these amazing-looking pieces of history!!! _________________
Canon EOS 5D / EOS 40D
Carl Zeiss Jena: Flektogon 2.8/20, 2.4/35, 2.8/35, Pancolar 2/50, MC 1.8/50, MC 1.8/80, Triotar 4/135, Tessar 2.8/50, S 4/135 1Q, S 3.5/135, Sonnar 3.5/135 MC, 2.8/180, Biotar 2/5,8cm, 2/58, 1.5/75
Carl Zeiss: Distagon 2/28 T*, 1.4/35 T*, Ultron 1.8/50, Tessar 2.8/50, Planar 1.4/50 T* MM, 1.7/50 T* MM, 1.4/85 T* AEG, Sonnar 2.8/135 T*
Asahi Optical Co.: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 2.8/120, 2.5/135 I & II, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4/300, 5.6/400, 4/45-125, 4.5/85-210, Super-Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4.5/70-150, Fish-Eye-Takumar 4/17, Macro-Takumar 4/50, Super-Macro Takumar 4/50, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar 4/50, 4/100, Bellows-Takumar 4/100, Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 3.5/50, 2.4/58, 3.5/100, Asahi-Kogaku Tele-Takumar 3.5/135, Auto-Takumar 2.3/35, 3.5/35, 1.8/55, 1.8/55 (Zebra), 2/55, 2.2/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, Takumar 4/35, 2.2/55, 2/58, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 3.5/200, 5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 5.6/200, 6.3/300, SMC Takumar 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, SMC-M 1.4/50, 1.7/50, 2/50
Tomioka: Tominon 2/5cm, Auto-Chinon 3.5/21, 1.4/55, Auto-Yashinon DS-M 1.2/55 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Krisgage
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 681 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Krisgage wrote:
Thank you Mal !
It seem I got 2 lenses from 2 different era ! _________________ Photos and Lenses Journal
http://krisgage.livejournal.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
orly_andico
Joined: 02 Jul 2008 Posts: 253 Location: Philippines
|
Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 1:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
orly_andico wrote:
Kris,
The Tevidon is a TV lens. As such it has a very very short register distance, it will probably not reach infinity even on a G1-class (micro-4/3) camera.
The only use I can think of for a lens of such short register is to reverse it and use it as a "super macro." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Krisgage
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 681 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Krisgage wrote:
orly_andico wrote: |
Kris,
The Tevidon is a TV lens. As such it has a very very short register distance, it will probably not reach infinity even on a G1-class (micro-4/3) camera.
The only use I can think of for a lens of such short register is to reverse it and use it as a "super macro." |
Thanks ! I did something else for the other brass lenses. Will post it below. _________________ Photos and Lenses Journal
http://krisgage.livejournal.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Krisgage
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 Posts: 681 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 3:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Krisgage wrote:
I have a spoiled Pentacon 50mm lens. I removed the front most of the lens of this Pentacon lens and replaced it with CZJ Tessar front lens.
Here are the photos I shot in that combination. The distance for it to focus is very very short.
My mum
My dad
And with the Tessar lens itself, hand mounted it on my E-510, its the same for the focusing distance. Very very short too and seems blurry.
_________________ Photos and Lenses Journal
http://krisgage.livejournal.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|