View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2015 12:22 am Post subject: Canon Serenar 100mm f4 |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
I've just bought a Canon 100mm Serenar f4 in Leica screw mount. Unfortunately, somebody has messed with the rangefinder coupling so it's now most easily used on a mirrorless body - scale focusing only on a Leica. This particular one was made in 1948 or 1949 according to Peter Kitchingman's website - http://canonrangefinder.servehttp.com/index.php?page=lenses&type=telephoto_lenses&id=26.
Brass body, weighs almost 500 grams. It's a simple Cooke Triplet design and, as far as I can see, only 4 of the six surfaces are coated. Too many iris blades to count. Closest focus distance is only 5 feet. For a lens around 65 years old it's in very good condition optically and mechanically. It needs a little help in processing to give its best - raise the contrast a touch and warm the image sometimes, but not very much. 'Bokeh' seems pleasant to my eyes. I've yet to use an old Canon Rangefinder lens that I haven't liked.
Winter sunset - f4:
Robin on a wire - f4, about half the frame:
Back-lit leaves - f4 (slightly mis-focused!):
Fence post - f4:
_________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marek
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 903 Location: In the heart of Europe
|
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2015 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marek wrote:
That's very nice bokeh behind the bird, as well as color around the bird and the tree, very vivid. Definitely makes me want to check the lens at Flickr for more bokeh-dope.
ISO possibly a little bit high in case of some shots (again, the bird). _________________ Angry young man !
Flickr | Juzaphoto | Ebay sales
marekfiser [at] gmail [dot] com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2015 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
It's a nice looking lens,shame about the min focus distance and the damaged coupling. _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Shriver
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 Posts: 199
|
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
John Shriver wrote:
You got one without internal haze? Very lucky. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
I have a lens exactly like this -- came with a shoe-mount optical glass viewfinder and a leather case to house both. Recently I bought an LTM to NEX adapter for my NEX 7. Just haven't gotten to my LTM lenses yet, but seeing how well yours does makes me want to step up the time table. I really like the bokeh you're getting, especially with the fencepost shot. Great detail too. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BeardsAreBest
Joined: 09 May 2014 Posts: 286 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
BeardsAreBest wrote:
Beautiful Lens!
Beautiful pictures!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
vroger
Joined: 23 Jul 2014 Posts: 623 Location: MN
Expire: 2016-10-21
|
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vroger wrote:
Looks lovely, to bad it was modified. Perhaps you got it for a better price however. _________________ Roger Lund
Canon EOS-M, Fuji X-E2, Helois 44-0 Vintage, Helois 44-4, Canon FD 50mm 1.8, Jupiter 8 50mm F2, Jupiter 3 50mm F1.5, Canon Serenar 50mm 1.9, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM, Canon Serenar 85mm F2, Leica 50mm f2 summar, E.Ludwig 50mm F2.9, Rekagon will.wetzlar 50mm 2.8,, a.schacht ulm travenar 135mm F3.5, CZJ 29mm 2.8 Hoya 28mm 2.8, CZ Tessar 50mm 2.8, MIR 37mm. 2.8, Porst Color Reflex MC 50mm 1.7, Vivitar 28mm 2.8 mc cf
http://photography.rogerlund.net
For sale: Canon EOS-M and MF Adapters. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
The lens was indeed far from expensive. As for being free from internal haze, from what I can gather that seems to be much more common in some of the later Canon rangefinder lenses. It really is a nice lens and it's hard to avoid concluding that it's optically as good as a 90mm Elmar of the same vintage - although it's massive and heavy in comparison.
Since I got it I've done a little more reading and now wonder if it has actually had the rangefinder coupling cam altered. I gather that the first of the Serenars were not fully standardised. The thread dimensions are mentioned in the literature and this one won't actually fit into all my Leica screw-bayonet adapters (either Leitz or Voigtlander make). The profile of the cam surface looks different to my other Canon screw lenses and I wonder if in fact the early Serenars might have had some hand-finishing done to ensure correct functioning with the contemporary Canon bodies. _________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
Could you take a picture of the rear and post it too see if their are others out there? _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BeardsAreBest
Joined: 09 May 2014 Posts: 286 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2016 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
BeardsAreBest wrote:
Having just acquired one of these beauties, mainly cause they are so shiny (and results from the 85 1.9 and 50 1.8 are nothing short of amazing!) have been giving it a good amount of time on the A7 and despite most of what i can find on the net suggesting the smaller 3.5 version is better, i think this is another winner serenar.
This one fits direct m39, not sure what year it made, finding model specifics is proving harder than i thought. Type II?? serial 47251.
Liking these RF lenses so much i have a 135 f4 on the way.
Couple pics from mine. All colour pics are straight out of camera, the B/W has had a little processing.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2016 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Amazing sharpness and lovely bokeh from wide open.
A treasure of a lens.
Thank you for sharing these
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WNG555
Joined: 18 Dec 2014 Posts: 784 Location: Arrid-Zone-A, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
WNG555 wrote:
Lovely rendering from the Serenar!
I was also taken with its shiny finish and picked up one last year. Then I realized it wasn't polished aluminum, but chromed brass.
Also came with the later smaller aluminum 100 f/3.5, but it's hazed and needs service. So, no comparisons to offer, yet.
The later 135mm f/3.5 is also a very good performer.
Always keeping an eye out for these rangefinder lenses, especially for a bargain. _________________ "The eyes are useless when the mind is blind."
Sony ILCE-6000, SELP1650, SEL1855, SEL55210, SEL5018. Sigma 19/30/60mm f2.8 EX DN Art.
Rokinon 8mm f3.5 Fish-Eye, 14mm f2.8 IF ED UMC. Samyang 12mm f2.8 ED AS NCS Fish-Eye.
And a bunch of Manual-Focus Lenses
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|