| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
fotkino
Joined: 04 May 2011
Posts: 111
Location: Russia, Moscow
|
 Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:15 pm Post subject: Canon FD 55/1.2 vs Porst 55/1.2 Quick comparison test |
 |
|
fotkino wrote:
Canon EOS-M > EF-M to EOS adapter >EOS - Pentax-K adapter > Porst COLOR REFLEX 55/1.2
vs
Canon EOS-M > EF-M to FD adapter > Canon FD 55/1.2 S.S.C Aspherical
f/1.2
Porst:
Canon:
Porst:
Canon:
Porst:
Canon:
Porst:
Canon:
_________________
_____________________________________
Sorry for my English |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fotkino
Joined: 04 May 2011
Posts: 111
Location: Russia, Moscow
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fotkino wrote:
Canon EOS-M > EF-M - FD adapter > Canon FD 55/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical
Samples f/1.2
_________________
_____________________________________
Sorry for my English |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rmcinc
Joined: 13 Feb 2013
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:27 pm Post subject: Re: Canon FD 55/1.2 vs Porst 55/1.2 Quick comparison test |
|
|
rmcinc wrote:
Canon FD 55/1.2 S.S.C Aspherical is a great lens.
As far as a know the Porst 55 1.2 is made by cosina and it's really soft.
It will be great if you can also provide some comparison on different aperture. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Arctures
Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Posts: 295
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arctures wrote:
What camera are you using this lens on?
_________________
Sony A7, NEX-5n, Panasonic GH5(Oly12-40/2. , Contax Distagon T* 28/2.8, Contax Planar T* 50/1.4, Contax T* 80-200/4,
Minolta Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Minolta MC Rokkor-X PF 50/1.7, Minolta MD 50/2.0, Konica Hexanon AR 50/1.8,
Konica Hexanon 57/1.4, Rokkor-PF 55/1.7, Konica Hexanon 40/1.8, Auto Yashinon 50/2.0, Canon FD 50/3.5
Voigtl�nder APO Lanthar 90/3.5 M42, Topcon RE.Topcor 58/1.8, Helios-44-2 58/2.0, Canon FD 24/2.8,
Canon FD 135/2.5 SC, Auto Topcor 135/3.5, Pentax SMC 55/1.8, Minolta 35/2.8, Minolta MD 35-70/3.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fotkino
Joined: 04 May 2011
Posts: 111
Location: Russia, Moscow
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:06 pm Post subject: Re: Canon FD 55/1.2 vs Porst 55/1.2 Quick comparison test |
|
|
fotkino wrote:
| rmcinc wrote: |
It will be great if you can also provide some comparison on different aperture. |
OK, I'll do it on Thursday or Friday
_________________
_____________________________________
Sorry for my English |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fotkino
Joined: 04 May 2011
Posts: 111
Location: Russia, Moscow
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fotkino wrote:
| Arctures wrote: |
| What camera are you using this lens on? |
Canon EOS M (first mirrorless camera from Canon)
_________________
_____________________________________
Sorry for my English |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 4711
Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
wow, the Canon is way better than the Porst 
Thx, nice test 
_________________
Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
killwilly
Joined: 16 May 2011
Posts: 111
Location: United Kingdom
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
killwilly wrote:
How does the FD lens look at infinity focus on the M body? I'm presuming the adapter doesn't have any glass.
_________________
Alan. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fotkino
Joined: 04 May 2011
Posts: 111
Location: Russia, Moscow
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fotkino wrote:
| killwilly wrote: |
| How does the FD lens look at infinity focus on the M body? I'm presuming the adapter doesn't have any glass. |
Yes, I have a lensless adapter, which allows to put these lenses and focusing to infinity. In comparison with the EOS adapter can be seen that it is shorter.
That's just my lens at infinity does not possess the quality  Not sure it is designed for this
infinity at f/8
far far away crop
adapters and look
_________________
_____________________________________
Sorry for my English |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 544
Location: London, UK.
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:17 pm Post subject: Re: Canon FD 55/1.2 vs Porst 55/1.2 Quick comparison test |
|
|
DSG wrote:
| rmcinc wrote: |
Canon FD 55/1.2 S.S.C Aspherical is a great lens.
As far as a know the Porst 55 1.2 is made by cosina and it's really soft.
|
The Porst 135mm f1.8 was made by Mitake, so its possible that the 55mm f1.2 was too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 544
Location: London, UK.
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DSG wrote:
| fotkino wrote: |
| killwilly wrote: |
| How does the FD lens look at infinity focus on the M body? I'm presuming the adapter doesn't have any glass. |
Yes, I have a lensless adapter, which allows to put these lenses and focusing to infinity. In comparison with the EOS adapter can be seen that it is shorter.
That's just my lens at infinity does not possess the quality Not sure it is designed for this
infinity at f/8
far far away crop
adapters and look
|
Just wanted to warn you that the FD 55mm f1.2 SSC Aspherical is highly radioactive, about 60% as radioactive as Radium in fact!...And unlike the Pentax Tamukars, its the front element that is most radioactive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phenix jc
Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Posts: 398
Location: France
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phenix jc wrote:
TY for sharing ;
Of course the L or the Aspherical are not in the same league...
_________________
"Plonger les choses dans la lumière, c'est les plonger dans l'infini" Léonard De Vinci
f/1.2 club Zuiko : 50/1.2, 55/1.2 Rokkor : 50/1.2, 58/1.2 Nikkor : 50/1.2, 55/1.2 Third Party : Porst(Fujinon-X) 50/1.2, Porst 55/1.2 Canon : S 50/1.2, nFD 50/1.2, FL 55/1.2, R 58/1.2, nFD 85/1.2 Hexanon : 57/1.2 Nokton : 50/1.1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fotkino
Joined: 04 May 2011
Posts: 111
Location: Russia, Moscow
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
fotkino wrote:
| DSG wrote: |
Just wanted to warn you that the FD 55mm f1.2 SSC Aspherical is highly radioactive, about 60% as radioactive as Radium in fact!...And unlike the Pentax Tamukars, its the front element that is most radioactive. |
Oh, yes, thank you, on YouTube I've seen enough movies about it 
I hope if I keep it near my super takumar 50/1.4 - they do not fight and will not start a nuclear war
_________________
_____________________________________
Sorry for my English |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bille
Joined: 03 Jan 2013
Posts: 381
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bille wrote:
| fotkino wrote: |
Just wanted to warn you that the FD 55mm f1.2 SSC Aspherical is highly radioactive, (...) its the front element that is most radioactive. |
Confirmed. I measured up to 36 µSv/h at the front lens and from then on no longer felt comfortable with it... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bruzzo
Joined: 05 Jul 2012
Posts: 153
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bruzzo wrote:
Just wondering are there any differences between the UMC and non UMC version of the Porst 55/1.2?
If so which copy is this that you are using?
I am considering on getting a 1.2 standard prime lens and am struggling between the Canon FL/FD or Porst or Cosina and was leaning towards the Porst because of this review with a very high score in sharpness which I prefer:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/userreviews/porst-55mm-f1-2-color-reflex-mc-auto.html
But didn't know that it's actually considered one of the softer 1.2s. So I am wondering if the ppl in the pentax reviews were actually talking about the UMC version?
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PBFACTS
Joined: 24 Dec 2008
Posts: 565
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:36 pm Post subject: Re: Canon FD 55/1.2 vs Porst 55/1.2 Quick comparison test |
|
|
PBFACTS wrote:
| DSG wrote: |
| rmcinc wrote: |
Canon FD 55/1.2 S.S.C Aspherical is a great lens.
As far as a know the Porst 55 1.2 is made by cosina and it's really soft.
|
The Porst 135mm f1.8 was made by Mitake, so its possible that the 55mm f1.2 was too. |
More certainly made by tomioka
_________________
OM USER .. I KEEP/USE:
Om2 sp + T32 (grip/filter/zoom) + T8
+ Zuiko 16mm 3.5 / 55mm 1.2 / 65-200 4/ x1.4
+ Sigma 8mm 4.0 / 14mm 3.5 / 18-35 3.5-4.5
+ Tamron 35/105 2.8
+Tokina 150/500 5.6
+ Kiron 105/2.8 macro 1:1
+ Vivitar S1 90/180 falst field macro
+ 2x Doubler HR7
>>I SELL: OM10 + OM4ti
+ i sell: OM Md1 + Md 2 + Grip PowerPack + charger
+ i sell: OM Zuiko 24mm 2.8 / 28mm 3.5 / 50mm 1.8 / 50mm 1.4 / 50mm 3.5 macro / 35-70 3.6 / 35-105 3.5-4.5 / 75-150 4 / 500mm / 2xA
+ i sell: OM Kiron 28/105 3.2-4.5 / 1.5 converter
+ i sell: OM Makinon reflex 5.6/300 + Spector reflex (makinon) 500mm
+ i sell: OM Macro panagor extender 1:1
+ i sell: OM Sigma 16mm 2.8 fisheye (last version) / 21-35 3.5-4.2 ot/ 28-70 2.8 /1000mm mirror
+ i sell: Tamron 28-70 3.5-4.5 / 28-80 sp 3.5-4.2 / 28-135 sp 4-4.5 / /28-200 3.5 / 35-135 3..5-4.5 / 90mm sp macro 1:1 2.8
+ i sell: OM Soligor 2x doubler / x3 converte
+ i sell: Soligor FisheEye x0.15
+ i sell: OM Tokina 28/135 4-4.6 / 70/210 3.5 (= vivitar S1 v2)
+ i sell: OM Vivitar 28-70 3.5-4.8 / 28-90 s1 2.8-3.5 / 35-70 2.8-3.8 / 55/2.8 Macro 1:1 (komine) / 70-150 3.8 ot (kiron) / 75-150 ot 3.8 (tokina + 2x matched)
+ i sell : OM cosina 100-500 5.6/8 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phenix jc
Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Posts: 398
Location: France
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2013 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phenix jc wrote:
| bruzzo wrote: |
Just wondering are there any differences between the UMC and non UMC version of the Porst 55/1.2?
|
There is no UMC 55/1.2 Porst.
The UMC Porst is an EBC X-FUJINON 50/1.2. Straight.
2 very different lenses
_________________
"Plonger les choses dans la lumière, c'est les plonger dans l'infini" Léonard De Vinci
f/1.2 club Zuiko : 50/1.2, 55/1.2 Rokkor : 50/1.2, 58/1.2 Nikkor : 50/1.2, 55/1.2 Third Party : Porst(Fujinon-X) 50/1.2, Porst 55/1.2 Canon : S 50/1.2, nFD 50/1.2, FL 55/1.2, R 58/1.2, nFD 85/1.2 Hexanon : 57/1.2 Nokton : 50/1.1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
