Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 2:32 pm Post subject:
cooltouch wrote:
Great detail. Incidentally, over at the photrio.com forum (used to be apug.org) there's a discussion on the Minolta XK. One member posted an ad from a 1975 photo magazine. The ad includes Canon prices. I was rather surprised to see that the 35-70/2.8-3.5 SSC was the second most expensive Canon zoom in that ad at $429.95:
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 11:25 pm Post subject:
Oldhand wrote:
Yes, a very expensive lens indeed. I guess that might reflect the extensive costs of R&D in bringing it to market.
The fact that the design was copied so widely afterwards reflects how good it was.
Here are some more from this lens
Tom
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 1130 Location: Slovakia
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 11:33 am Post subject:
spleenone wrote:
no.3 from third batch has some nice contrast as I see and natural colors which I like _________________ Shoot on analog mainly with Nikkor glass
then Pentacon6TL for squares
and Fujica GL690 in case of 6x9
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum