View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3614 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:45 pm Post subject: Canon FD 300 f4 L |
|
|
trifox wrote:
I couldn't resist -- It was impossible ...
150 GBP ... on ebay...
So I have got TWO 300 mm lenses..
- 2 UD glass elements,
- internal focusing,
- extremely light lens...
- focusing is EXTREMELY SMOOTH - my initial thought was that the focusing ring is damaged but it's not
tf _________________ Flickr.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008 Posts: 2106 Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
Oh TF, you are addicted to Fine Drug. Be careful, I warned you. _________________ Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marty
Joined: 09 Apr 2009 Posts: 767 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marty wrote:
Well, congrats nice acquisition. You have put together a great collection of FD L glass indeed.
Cheers, Marty. _________________ Canon FD
Bodies: AT-1, A-1, T-90
Lenses: nFD 20mm f2.8, 24 f2.8, 28 f2.8, 35 f2, FD 50 f1.8 S.C., 85 f1.8, 100 f2.8, 135 f2.8, 200 f4, 300 f4
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
The FD 300/4 L was overshadowed by the 300/2.8 L, but is just as good IMO as the 300/2.8 when it's stopped down to f/4. Plus, it's a helluva lot lighter. Great lens. Post some pics, please, once you've had a chance to use it. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3614 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
The FD 300/4 L was overshadowed by the 300/2.8 L, but is just as good IMO as the 300/2.8 when it's stopped down to f/4. Plus, it's a helluva lot lighter. Great lens. Post some pics, please, once you've had a chance to use it. |
yes!!
FD 300 F4 L -- 2 ultra-D elements
FD 300 f2.8 L - 2 ultra-D elements + 1 fluorite element-- it must be better..
tf _________________ Flickr.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3614 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
I must say that Germany and Japan --
both countries have the best optics in the world..
Canon is one of them .. for sure..
tf _________________ Flickr.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nelson
Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Posts: 618 Location: close to Paris, France
|
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nelson wrote:
And THE question :
how much for an EF conversion ? _________________ DSLR : EOS 350D, 300D, 7D, 5D
Pentacon 50 f1.8, 135 f2.8, 200 f4;
TAIR 3S
Helios 44/2
Meyer Optik Orestegor 200mm f4 Orestegor 300mm f4
Tamron 24mm f2.5 01B, 300mm f5.6 670Au, 75 250, 300mm f5.6 SP 54B, 500mm f8 SP 55B, SP 70 210 3.5, SP 60 300
my MF lenses
EF 50 1.8 I, EF 100macro f2.8, EF 70-200 F4 L is, EFS 17-55 f2.8 is, Sigma 10-20 EX, 18-50 2.8 EX, 300 f4 hsm, 400 5.6 hsm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|