View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Eriksen
Joined: 15 Nov 2016 Posts: 153
|
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 5:20 am Post subject: Best wide angle lenses for A7iii? |
|
|
Eriksen wrote:
I'm looking for a good wide angle below 20mm and need to know which lenses work best on a Sony A7III camera? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
My vote is for either the Tokina or the Tamron 17mm f/3.5. They are both outstanding lenses and should work very well on your Sony. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergun
Joined: 01 Jun 2017 Posts: 283 Location: наша раша
|
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
sergun wrote:
Forget about the old lenses.
If fix the:
1 Batis 18mm
2 Laowa 15
3 Tokina Firin 20mm
4 Voigtländer 12/15mm _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/105161078@N06/
https://fotoload.ru/fotosets/6661/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
Usually the original expensive lenses work best on the A7 series.
However, I like to use my Voigtlaender VM 12/5.6 and 15/4.5 on my A7R II. I don't know whether the A7 III works likewise good with RF lenses. The older A7 struggled with color shift and corner smearing.
If you are looking for legacy extreme wide angles you have to make up your mind whether you prefer the typical fish eye stile or rectilinear lenses.
I've also some fish-eye SLR lenses but I didn't test them on my A7R II yet as I prefer the rectilinear design. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
noddywithoutbigears
Joined: 13 Jan 2010 Posts: 215 Location: Leek, Staffordshire
|
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
noddywithoutbigears wrote:
You could always try the Zenitar 16mm f2.8 fisheye, reasonably priced and well regarded. You shouldn’t have any problems in M42 mount. _________________ Sony A7
Super Takumar 55mm F18, Helios 44-2 58mm f2, Super Takumar 85mm f1.9, Pentacon 50mm f1.8, Zenitar 16mm f2.8 Fisheye, Carl Zeiss Vario Prakticar 35-70mm f2.7-3.5. Carl Zeiss Prakticar 35mm f2.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3754 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 10:54 am Post subject: Re: Best wide angle lenses for A7iii? |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Eriksen wrote: |
I'm looking for a good wide angle below 20mm and need to know which lenses work best on a Sony A7III camera? |
Since you ask for "the best lens below 20mm" (and not "the best vintage lens below 20mm"), i would recommend modern lenses as well, e. g. the Zeiss Batis 2.8/18mm or similar lenses from other manufacturers. Even the most respected vintage lenses such as the Zeiss C/Y Distagon 4/18mm, the Minolta MC/MD 4/17mm or the Canon (n)FD 4/17mm suffer from CAs and - at 4 and f5.6 - from distinctive smearing in the outer part of the image.
Stephan _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Antoine
Joined: 08 Jan 2016 Posts: 298 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Antoine wrote:
Just a question for tech experts:
-Given CA easily corrected in treatment
- A7iii is only 24 mP
Does it really matter to have the very best or would some good enough cheaper vintage solutions be just as good?
Or is the smearing too bad?
Merry Xmas _________________ Antoine
Sony A6000 APS-C and Sony A7 Rii
Minolta Fisheye MD Rokkor 7.5 mm f4, Fisheye MD 16 f2.8 MD R 17mm f4, MD R 20mm f2.8, MC VFC & MDIII 24mm f2.8, MD 28mm f2.0 &3.5, MD II 35mm 1.8, MD 45mm f2.0, MD 50mm f 1.2 & MD I f1.4, MC PG 58mm 1.2, MD 85mm f2.0, MD R 85mm f2.8 Varisoft, MC 85mm f1.7 MD R 100mm f2.5, MD R 100mm f4.0 macro, MD III 135mm f2.8, MD R 200mm f2.8 & 4.0, RF 250mm f5.6, MD 300mm f4.5, MD APO 400 mm f5.6, RF 500mm f8.0, RF 800mm f8.0 *2 300-s and 300-l
100 mm f4 macro bellows (5/4)
Vivitar 17mm f3.5, Elicar 300mm mirror f5.6, Zhongi turbo ii
Sigma 16mm f 2.8 fish eye
Zooms:24-50 mm f4, 35-70 mm f3.5 macro, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5, 50-135 f 3.5, 70-210 f4 and MD APO 100-500 mm f8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3754 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2018 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Antoine wrote: |
Just a question for tech experts:
-Given CA easily corrected in treatment
- A7iii is only 24 mP
Does it really matter to have the very best or would some good enough cheaper vintage solutions be just as good?
Or is the smearing too bad?
Merry Xmas |
Depends on the aperture you want to use. A Zeiss Loxia 2.8/21mm will have tack sharp corners even at f2.8, and no CAs. A Minolta MD 4/17mm has similar performance at f11, and only after removing CAs via software.
Stephan _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2018 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Antoine wrote: |
Just a question for tech experts:
-Given CA easily corrected in treatment
- A7iii is only 24 mP
Does it really matter to have the very best or would some good enough cheaper vintage solutions be just as good?
Or is the smearing too bad?
Merry Xmas |
I don't have any direct experience, since I don't own one of the a7 series of cameras. But, going back to my recommendation of the Tokina 17mm or Tamron 17mm, I have seen quite a few images posted on this forum, which is about manual focus lenses, after all, by folks with these cameras and these lenses, and the images are often simply amazing, showing no tendency toward smearing in the corners. They're so good that, frankly, they make me jealous. I guess ultimately it will depend on your budget, however. I don't know how expensive the new lenses are that were listed above, but the Tokina and Tamron can usually be found at about $200 per. So if budget is a factor, these are viable choices. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2018 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
There is Opteka 15mm f/4 in EF mount on eBay for $130 only... _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
invisible
Joined: 06 Jun 2013 Posts: 343
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2018 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
invisible wrote:
If we are talking vintage MF, then in my personal experience the best is the Tamron Adaptall-2 17/3.5. I like this one much better than the Vivitar/Tokina 17/3.5, which I sold.
If you don't mind autofocus or zooms, then the best by far would be, in my opinion, the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8. For a budget option, I'd strongly recommend considering the Tamron AF 20-40mm f/2.7-3.5.
I use all of the above with a full-frame Nikon DSLR. Not sure how they would perform on a Sony, though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2931 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2018 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
Having had and sold my Zeiss Loxia 21mm 2.8 (and regretting it!) I have to say (echoing what stevemark said) you really should give it some consideration. Though it is outside your parameters (barely) and is expensive it is the closest I have ever come to a perfect lens. Stunning sharpness, corner to corner, at every aperture. Exceedingly well corrected optically. My only (extremely minor!) niggling complaint is with the ergonomics. The blue dot is hard to see in low light and the knurls are too low a relief for my taste and the focus and aperture knurls are the same. I prefer a lens that has some variaton between the tow for instant tactile verification of which you'v grabbed. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergun
Joined: 01 Jun 2017 Posts: 283 Location: наша раша
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
sergun wrote:
From modern wide angle lenses I have a Tokina Firin 20mm. I use it for more than a year and I can say this is a very good versatile lens for landscape (although my copy is a bit soft on the right side) but in recent years, increasingly take Canon nFD 24/2.8 (for which I find it easier to find the story) and now I'd rather have in my bag two lens is 17-18mm and 24-25mm. I decided to replace the Canon 24 to Loxia 25/2.4 but 17-18mm alternatives to the Batis 18mm no but it is heavy , autofocus and a huge diameter filters. If Zeiss had made a 17-18mm Loxia I would have welcomed it. ) _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/105161078@N06/
https://fotoload.ru/fotosets/6661/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
padam
Joined: 09 Oct 2012 Posts: 175 Location: Hungary
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
padam wrote:
Maybe not wide enough, but I am voting for this: https://phillipreeve.net/blog/voigtlander-21mm-f35-review/
Small, not terribly expensive, no corner problems, and it has the support for the 5-axis stabilization (Loxia has no distance information so it is only 3-axis). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Abbazz
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 1098 Location: Jakarta
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Abbazz wrote:
If you really want to go wide, there is nothing like the Heliar Hyper-Wide 10mm F/5.6. Pixel peepers will tell you the corners are not as sharp as a tack. Tell the pixel peepers to f..., err... no, tell them that there is no comparison because there is no other 10mm rectilinear lens that covers 24x36! And that this lens allows you to take pictures like no other lens: https://phillipreeve.net/blog/review-voigtlander-10mm-5-6-e-hyper-wide-heliar/
Check the upper right corner sharpness by clicking in the picture. It looks quite good to me:
Cheers!
Abbazz _________________ Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment decisif, et le chef-d'oeuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaitre et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz
The 6x9 Photography Online Resource:
http://artbig.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
Abbazz wrote: |
If you really want to go wide, there is nothing like the Heliar Hyper-Wide 10mm F/5.6. Pixel peepers will tell you the corners are not as sharp as a tack. Tell the pixel peepers to f..., err... no, tell them that there is no comparison because there is no other 10mm rectilinear lens that covers 24x36! And that this lens allows you to take pictures like no other lens. |
Really nice!
I only have the old and very first version of the CV Heliar Ultra-Wide 12mm/F5.6 in LTM but I still consider it as more than good enough and can't dedect any color shift. Smearing at very outer corners is hardly visible as well.
Example test picture from my A7R II at F8:
However, maybe I'll reconsider the 10mm version again. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Abbazz
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 1098 Location: Jakarta
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Abbazz wrote:
tb_a wrote: |
Really nice!
I only have the old and very first version of the CV Heliar Ultra-Wide 12mm/F5.6 in LTM but I still consider it as more than good enough and can't dedect any color shift. Smearing at very outer corners is hardly visible as well.
Example test picture from my A7R II at F8:
However, maybe I'll reconsider the 10mm version again. |
Thank you for the kind words.
I also have the 12mm in LTM version. It is a good lens for film but is definitely less sharp than the newer 10mm on 24x36 digital sensors. The 10mm lens in Sony FE mount also has the advantage of providing EXIF info and allowing auto-corrections of aberrations in applications that allow it. The 12mm, besides lacking in the sharpness division, also requires manual correction of vignetting and chromatic aberrations. But it's convenient because of its small size and because it accepts ordinary filters with its dedicated adapter (which is not so easy to find now).
The use of filters is not really an issue for me with the 10mm lens, as I don't find filters so useful on such wide lenses. A polarizer will cause uneven skies and other filters can usually be emulated easily in software. And for die-hard filter users, there are some adapters available that allow the use of square filters.
The 10mm is not such a big lens , even in Sony FE mount. I usually prefer to buy Voigtländer lenses in Leica-M mount because I can use them on various cameras with adapters, or use adapters with helicoid in order to overcome the longish minimum focus of RF lenses. But I bought the 10mm in Sony FE because I had no intention to use it on other cameras and also because the minimum focus was not a problem with that lens.
Not taken at the min. focus!
Cheers!
Abbazz _________________ Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment decisif, et le chef-d'oeuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaitre et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz
The 6x9 Photography Online Resource:
http://artbig.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
Abbazz wrote: |
I also have the 12mm in LTM version. It is a good lens for film but is definitely less sharp than the newer 10mm on 24x36 digital sensors. The 10mm lens in Sony FE mount also has the advantage of providing EXIF info and allowing auto-corrections of aberrations in applications that allow it. The 12mm, besides lacking in the sharpness division, also requires manual correction of vignetting and chromatic aberrations. But it's convenient because of its small size and because it accepts ordinary filters with its dedicated adapter (which is not so easy to find now).
The use of filters is not really an issue for me with the 10mm lens, as I don't find filters so useful on such wide lenses. A polarizer will cause uneven skies and other filters can usually be emulated easily in software. And for die-hard filter users, there are some adapters available that allow the use of square filters.
The 10mm is not such a big lens , even in Sony FE mount. I usually prefer to buy Voigtländer lenses in Leica-M mount because I can use them on various cameras with adapters, or use adapters with helicoid in order to overcome the longish minimum focus of RF lenses. But I bought the 10mm in Sony FE because I had no intention to use it on other cameras and also because the minimum focus was not a problem with that lens. |
Thanks for the additional informations. If at all, the Leica-M version is the only one for me to go for as I'll intend to use these lenses also on my Ricoh GXR-M. Furthermore I've got the Techart PRO adapter to enable the use in AF mode (which isn't important for a 10mm lens anyway) with all of my RF lenses and adapted other ones as well. I would have been interested in the Voigtlaender 65 and 110 mm APO Lanthars but for stated reasons this is a no-go for me as they are only available in E-mount. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eriksen
Joined: 15 Nov 2016 Posts: 153
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Eriksen wrote:
Will the LM version of Voiglander with adapter give same IQ as the Sony E version? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
Eriksen wrote: |
Will the LM version of Voiglander with adapter give same IQ as the Sony E version? |
Yes, it's the same lens with different mount if we are talking about the present new collection. The older M-mount or LTM/M39 versions may be slightly different.
E.g. the 15mm/F4.5 exists in 4 different versions (version 1 in LTM, versions 2 and 3 in m-mount); additionally the version 3 is available in E-mount as well.
The same applies for the 12mm/F5.6 lens. The new 10mm lens exists only in 2 versions (LM and E-mount)
I've got the 15mm in version 1 and consider it as good enough on my A7R II.
A typical landscape example slightly optimized in Lightroom (lens profile applied); click on picture for best quality viewing:
_________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Abbazz
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 1098 Location: Jakarta
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Abbazz wrote:
tb_a wrote: |
Thanks for the additional informations. If at all, the Leica-M version is the only one for me to go for as I'll intend to use these lenses also on my Ricoh GXR-M. Furthermore I've got the Techart PRO adapter to enable the use in AF mode (which isn't important for a 10mm lens anyway) with all of my RF lenses and adapted other ones as well. I would have been interested in the Voigtlaender 65 and 110 mm APO Lanthars but for stated reasons this is a no-go for me as they are only available in E-mount. |
You're welcome.
I 100% agree regarding the added versatility of the Leica mount. The 10mm is the only C/V lens I will ever buy in Sony FE mount for the reasons stated above:
- automatic correction of aberrations is something nice to have with an ultrawide lens.
- there is no use for a close-up adapter or for the Techart autofocusing adapter with a lens this wide: you set the focus to 0.5m and everything will be sharp from 0.25m to infinity.
- I will not be using the lens on my other cameras, which have a smaller sensor, because there are native lenses with a shorter focal length available that are smaller or faster.
Cheers,
Abbazz _________________ Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment decisif, et le chef-d'oeuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaitre et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz
The 6x9 Photography Online Resource:
http://artbig.com/
Last edited by Abbazz on Thu Dec 27, 2018 9:54 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Abbazz
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 1098 Location: Jakarta
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Abbazz wrote:
tb_a wrote: |
Eriksen wrote: |
Will the LM version of Voiglander with adapter give same IQ as the Sony E version? |
Yes, it's the same lens with different mount if we are talking about the present new collection. The older M-mount or LTM/M39 versions may be slightly different.
E.g. the 15mm/F4.5 exists in 4 different versions (version 1 in LTM, versions 2 and 3 in m-mount); additionally the version 3 is available in E-mount as well.
The same applies for the 12mm/F5.6 lens. The new 10mm lens exists only in 2 versions (LM and E-mount) |
Regarding lenses in Sony FE mount, Cosina's Japanese website states (sorry for the Google Translate broken English):
Cosina wrote: |
Optimized optical design
In addition to securing full-size image circle, it adopts optical design optimized for Sony E mount sensor. High resolution is maintained up to the periphery of the screen, and phenomena such as color hue are suppressed. |
According to user reviews on various forums, it seems that the optical formula has indeed been tweaked on the Sony mount version in order to accommodate the sensor stack on Sony cameras. Optical quality should therefore be better with the Sony mount version when using sony cameras. But the difference between both versions of the 10mm lens is slight anyway, whereas it is more evident on other lenses like the 40mm f/1.2 Nokton.
Cheers!
Abbazz _________________ Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment decisif, et le chef-d'oeuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaitre et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz
The 6x9 Photography Online Resource:
http://artbig.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Very nice Sebastien!! _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Abbazz
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 1098 Location: Jakarta
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Abbazz wrote:
kds315* wrote: |
Very nice Sebastien!! |
Thank you, Klaus. Much appreciated.
Cheers!
Abbazz _________________ Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment decisif, et le chef-d'oeuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaitre et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz
The 6x9 Photography Online Resource:
http://artbig.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|