MFlenses - A new life in a digital age
MFLenses 2026

Manual Focus Lenses Forum

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.
logovectorizer.com
Spotlight

Featured partner placement for the forum front page.

Auto super paragon 135/2.8
View previous topic :: View next topic  


Reply

Anybody knows the performance or who made it ?
It's another cheapie coming my way

i think it needs a good cleaning Shocked



Last edited by Rusty on Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:47 pm; edited 1 time in total


Reply

Paragon is a photax lens? It seems to be that

http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=14095&view=previous

This PMC in green remind me the VMC in green of Vivitar?

Rino.


Reply

Looks like an anagram of Panagor who also used the 'PMC' but in Panagors case in red letters


Reply

Rino

Thanks i saw that thread, but maybe paragon and photax are just the brand names and not the maker in both cases ?
i googled but cannot find more Confused


Reply

I'll guess it originated at Cima Kogaku. The diamond shaped witness mark is a characteristic of Cima. Yours would be newer than the one illustrated here.



Bill


Reply

Hi Bill !

You're the man! I was racking my brain thinking of where I had seen that diamond mentioned. Of course, you were the guy who had told me !

Nailed in one of course. Cimko it is. The lenses are kissing cousins on design and construction details.


Reply

Thanks guys !
Bill ... you should become a detective Very Happy Thanks for the info!


Reply

I learn from my mistakes. On my web site I comment that Cimko is probably the maker of some Chinon, Hanimex and Makinon 135s. I've learned otherwise since then!


Reply

casualcollector wrote:
I learn from my mistakes. On my web site I comment that Cimko is probably the maker of some Chinon, Hanimex and Makinon 135s. I've learned otherwise since then!


That's for all. Can you actualize your commentary in your web?

Rino.


Reply

estudleon wrote:
That's for all. Can you actualize your commentary in your web? Rino.


Can't do it, Rino. I haven't been a subscriber to that provider for four years now! I surprised they haven't removed it from the server. It still seems to get quite a few hits and links.

Bill


Reply

So how is the optical quality of the lens.... I'm lookin at one on ebay right now + pol. filter in mint condition for 57€


Reply

NikonD wrote:
So how is the optical quality of the lens.... I'm lookin at one on ebay right now + pol. filter in mint condition for 57€


That seems an awful lot... Shocked


Reply

realy? It's a good thing I didnt click on it Wink


Reply

NikonD wrote:
realy? It's a good thing I didnt click on it Wink


I think they usually go for 10€ - 20€, but I could be wrong Smile


Reply

Hi Bill,

It still gets hits and links because it is well done and extremely interesting.


Reply

NikonD wrote:
So how is the optical quality of the lens.... I'm lookin at one on ebay right now + pol. filter in mint condition for 57€


BEWARE : Later (1980 / 1985 ) Cima (cimko) lenses are among the worst in quality


Reply

Raising a thread from the dead here I know, but....

I bought one of these lenses today very cheaply. It's in great codition, nice clean glass and no marks on the body at all, and everything turns smoothly as it should.

But something is bugging me.

There's a dead fly inside the lens!

The mummified corpse is rattling around deep inside, I can get it from behind the iris to in front. At the front it appears to be up against the front element. Is it easy to get the front element out ?

I've had front glass out of other lenses, so I'm thinking this is they way to go? But does anyone know different?

Or should I just leave it in there and shake it behind the iris when I take pictures ? Rolling Eyes


Reply

I had a Super Paragon 200mm f:3.3 and it was very good.
Unfortunately I broke it... Crying or Very sad
It happened when I opened it and remounted glasses in a wrong order.


Reply

Olivier wrote:
I had a Super Paragon 200mm f:3.3 and it was very good.
Unfortunately I broke it... Crying or Very sad
It happened when I opened it and remounted glasses in a wrong order.


Yeah, that would **** it up! And that's what I'm trying to avoid. I've already got a shoe box full of broken ( by me ) lenses. Rolling Eyes


Reply



The fly, but it's cooperative in as much as it hides in the mechanism when I use the lens, which actually isn't a bad lens at all. Very Happy