| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2022 8:23 pm Post subject: Abandoned Housing Estate |
 |
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I used the 6.9mm f2.65 lens from a Mitsubishi projector on my Olympus OM-D E-M5.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 11062
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2022 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
 I like the variety of angles producing many views! (what building material is used, please?)
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2022 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Those are 1940s (immediate postwar) pre-fabricated houses, so they are made from slabs of concrete. They have been modernised and covered in wet-dash rendering in the 90s.
Roughcast stucco
Roughcast (also called 'wet-dash' in Cumbria and 'harling' in Scotland) is a render with a coarse finishing coat containing gravel thrown in a premixed state onto a wall. It is distinct from pebble dash (or 'dry dash') in which the aggregate is applied separately onto wet plaster.
The colour is a beige off-white, although some were painted by the owners.
The estate has been partly abandoned for 3 years now, some of the houses have already been demolished, some are still occupied, some are standing derelict.
https://www.nwemail.co.uk/news/18123517.outdated-millom-housing-estate-demolished-rebuilt-66-new-homes/
It looked like this before they started on the redevelopment project.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skida
Joined: 02 Mar 2012
Posts: 1826
Location: North East England
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
skida wrote:
Great set of results, even with the imperfections. It's all fascinating
_________________
Lots of 35mm Film Cameras
Lots of Lenses
New Vlog on Youtube called "The Olduns Shot"
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBHCOHaIrcYr7s3is1EcqxQ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Cheers. Glad you find them interesting. There are a lot of imperfections, the technical aspect of this shoot is a long way from perfect, there are all sorts of stitching and perspective problems, I had to ditch quite a few shots due to that, there are loads of other small issues of all kinds, blurry spots caused by the wind and the imperfections of the HDR software's ghost removal, the list goes on.
But overall, I was quite happy with the outcome because I learned quite a bit that will hopefully serve me in good stead for the next attempt at something similar and as abandoned and derelict things are one of my favourite subjects, it's good that I practice.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RokkorDoctor
Joined: 27 Nov 2021
Posts: 1438
Location: Kent, UK
Expire: 2025-05-01
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
RokkorDoctor wrote:
| iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
| ... and derelict things are one of my favourite subjects ... |
Same here 
Some people make a career out of photographing derelict buildings. Right of access is the biggest obstacle...
_________________
Mark
SONY A7S, A7RII + dust-sealed modded Novoflex/Fotodiox/Rayqual MD-NEX adapters
Minolta SR-1, SRT-101/303, XD7/XD11, XGM, X700
Bronica SQAi
Ricoh GX100
Minolta majority of all Rokkor SR/AR/MC/MD models made
Sigma 14mm/3.5 for SR mount
Tamron SP 60B 300mm/2.8 (Adaptall)
Samyang T-S 24mm/3.5 (Nikon mount, DIY converted to SR mount)
Schneider-Kreuznach PC-Super-Angulon 28mm/2.8 (SR mount)
Bronica PS 35/40/50/65/80/110/135/150/180/200/250mm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
