| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2530
Location: Thach Alabama
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 11:37 pm Post subject: A question. How good are Mamiya/Sekor lenses? |
 |
|
Big Dawg wrote:
A question. How good are Mamiya/Sekor lens? I am collecting the Vivitar chrome nose lens and believe there will be no 50mm one out there. Back in the day(Days of my youth) the camera makers provided a 50mm or close number lens with a new camera, so the after market lens makers did not always build the "Normal" lens when making a lens set. But the Mamiya/ Sekor lens in 50mm is a chrome nose (Well some are anyway) and I am thinking of adding it to finish up the chrome nose collection.
So! How good are they?
_________________
Big Dawg |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Mine I believe is very good. I have the 55mm f/1.4 with chrome nose. Again, I'll point you to my gallery of pictures from that lens.
http://www.pbase.com/mdlempert/mamiya55mm
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
casualcollector
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 749
Location: Spaced out on Florida's Space Coast
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
casualcollector wrote:
They do have a very good reputation. The fact that they look a lot like your chrome nose Vivitars may have something to do with Ponder and Best being the importer of both Mamiya/Sekor and Vivitar. Maybe you can spin the name ring out of a Vivitar 50 and use it on the Mamiya!
Bill
_________________
In Search Of "R" Serial Soligors
Found: 135/2.8 #R407660, 200/4 #R405526, 300/5.5 #R411127 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 8979
Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
Mine's all black, but I like it very ,very much...go get them BD 
_________________
Moira, Moderator 
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2530
Location: Thach Alabama
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Thanks for the answers guys. I think I may do this.
_________________
Big Dawg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Berlin, DE
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 2:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
The SX series are very nice; the rest are about average. Note that Rolleinar MC lenses were actually Mamiya SX lenses, rebadged and repackaged with Rollei QBM mount.
_________________
List of lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2530
Location: Thach Alabama
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
| aoleg wrote: |
| The SX series are very nice; the rest are about average. Note that Rolleinar MC lenses were actually Mamiya SX lenses, rebadged and repackaged with Rollei QBM mount. |
Are the SX's Chrome Nosed?
_________________
Big Dawg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 6602
Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Nope, the SX's aren't chrome nosed.
They also tend to be hard to use on DSLR's because, though the mount is M42, they have an overhanging lip on the aperture ring.
What you want is an "auto mamiya/sekor"
These came with or without chrome nose.
The cheapest and easiest to find probably is the 50/2
http://forum.mflenses.com/mamiya-sekor-2-50-cheap-normals-can-be-great-t22116,highlight,mamiya+sekor.html
_________________
I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kathmandu
Joined: 09 Dec 2009
Posts: 1479
Location: (Kathmandu,Nepal. Currently)Pacific Northwest, USA
Expire: 2012-04-08
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kathmandu wrote:
Big Dawg,
Yashinon-(I'm not certain who makes it for them )also has several Auto-Yashinon 50mm (f1.4 DX,plus some other apertures) Their older "J" cameras also carry the 50mm -chrome nose and body-these are supposed to be good-which may be up your alley. They pop up on ebay frequently.
Here's what it looks like-
The black ring is a filter in the second image.
.
 
I got rid of it as part of a "downsizing" move last year-which I regret,but not for long because I replaced it with the all black Auto Yashinon DSM 50mm f1.4.
Last edited by Kathmandu on Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:51 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 8979
Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
Mine is the AUTO mamiya/sekor ( spelt just like that with the "auto" in caps) It has a slight chrome ring/edge on the front...if that counts
_________________
Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7571
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 4:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
And here is the photo of the lens.
_________________
The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2530
Location: Thach Alabama
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Got my eye on a 50 f/2 cheapo...well I hope it stays a Cheapo. May bid tonight. Thanks for all the good input.
_________________
Big Dawg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Posts: 733
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
Nice looking lenses, these Chrome Yashinons, but it looks like the mirror of a 5D will crash into that rear element (at/near infinity focus):
http://i37.tinypic.com/nqbwpv.jpg
(not my pic, taken from an ebay object)
Some of you are not concerned with that of course.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 8979
Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
I suppose you are right on mentioning the canons problems with the mirror hitting some lenses but I should make mention I use the Pentax K200D and I think BD uses the K-7,not sure what camera Kathmandu uses and I am unaware of any mirror hitting with the Pentax's (?)
The Auto mamiya is a straight M42 mount but I am unsure if there is a difference with the SX Mamiya mount?
As for the Yashicas well I don't have one yet
_________________
Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 5883
Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
I'll have a '71 Camera 35 test of a Mamiya Sekor 55/1.8 ES lens tomorrow for you... the thing is ultra SHARP in the center - from 3.8 on... peaks at 96 at f/4 and 5.6, but the corners are less so - 68 and 5.6 and 8... where a Canon FE 50/1.4 peaks at 88/80- at 5.6 and 8, and a SMC Takumar gets 80/72 between 4 and f/11.
To me this says a couple of things - the Mamiya of the era was optimized for center resolution, and/or had more field curvature than the Canon and Takumar.
I'll link the review here tomorrow AM.
_________________
-Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
| calvin83 wrote: |
And here is the photo of the lens.
|
Yes, Calvin, that is exactly what my lens looks like. No, 80022 Here are a couple of pictures from it, although I did enhance the bokeh on the second...
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 5883
Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
Damn, that chrome 1.4 55 looks good... I'd been hankering after a chrome Yashinon DX just because I have the chrome 35 and 135, but the M/S looks even better...
For what it's worth, May 1971 Camera 35 magazine
May 1971 Camera 35 review Canon F1, Honeywell Pentax Spotmatic II, Mamiya/Sekor Auto XTL by Nesster, on Flickr
_________________
-Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shoenberg3
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 22
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shoenberg3 wrote:
just grabbed a auto mamiya/sekor sx 21mm f4
very very nice
I only had a night to play with but so far its looking quite good.
Here is a extreme corner crop at 100 percent!
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
No PP except for minor sharpening on LR. It was also taken in a dark room at F8, so the exposure time was 10 seconds! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Berlin, DE
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
| shoenberg3 wrote: |
just grabbed a auto mamiya/sekor sx 21mm f4
very very nice
I only had a night to play with but so far its looking quite good.
Here is a extreme corner crop at 100 percent! |
As I said, SX series are very nice. Earlier versions can be hit or miss (Mamiya didn't build all of its early lenses by the way, some were subcontracted; SX series were made by Mamiya itself, as far as I know).
_________________
List of lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 6602
Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
One SX at least was made by Tokina - the 90-230/4.5 two-touch zoom. That one was also made as a TX mount for Vivitar.
_________________
I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Posts: 733
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
| shoenberg3 wrote: |
just grabbed a auto mamiya/sekor sx 21mm f4
very very nice
I only had a night to play with but so far its looking quite good.
Here is a extreme corner crop at 100 percent!
No PP except for minor sharpening on LR. It was also taken in a dark room at F8, so the exposure time was 10 seconds! |
Not bad at all, but what will the corners look like on full-frame...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shoenberg3
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 22
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shoenberg3 wrote:
just recently got a 5d, mamiya sekor 21mm and 5d are match made in heaven
check out this full size test image with 5d
http://regex.info/exif-data/c1bf5ef0c1cb611e43632c7caca8a888.jpg
sure there is distortion, but i dont care because i shoot landscape with this lens
actual shots will come soon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Image looks good. I especially like the home made tube amplifier. I am guessing you are a male living alone somewhere in the US.
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shoenberg3
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 22
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
shoenberg3 wrote:
i kept saying actual shots will come soon from this lens
here is one:
cloudbreak by shoenberg3, on Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2530
Location: Thach Alabama
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
I like that photo!
_________________
Big Dawg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
