Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

A little Minolta shootout: Short zooms -vs- short primes
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:26 pm    Post subject: A little Minolta shootout: Short zooms -vs- short primes Reply with quote

Since my search for the best ~75-150mm lens got so many responses, I thought I should report what I found.

The Minolta MD 75-150/4 seemed like the best candidate so I picked up a (quite minty) copy. I also picked up an MD 50-135/3.5 for comparison

I built myself a little test scene to compare the zooms to my primes in that range (MD85/2 & MD135/3.5):


~150mm:
Minolta MD 75-150mm f/4 (set to "150mm")
~135mm:
Minolta MD Tele Rokkor 135mm f/3.5 (MDII version)
Minolta MD Zoom Rokkor 50-135mm f/3.5 (MDII version, set to "135mm")
Minolta MD Zoom 75-150mm f/4 (set to match the MD135/3.5)
~85mm:
Minolta MD Rokkor 85mm f/2 (MDII version)
Minolta MD Zoom 75-150mm f/4 (set to "75mm" which happens to match the MD85/2)
Tamron SP 35-80mm f/2.8-3.8 (set to "80mm")

All shot at ~1:15 magnification, to get comparable 100% crops:


Sharpnening:

(no sharpening on export)



150mm:

MD75-150/4 @ 150mm:

f/4

f/5.6

f/6.7

f/8

f/9.5

f/11




135mm:

MD135/3.5:

MD50-135/3.5 @ 135mm:

MD75-150/4 @ 135mm:


f/3.5 & f/4
MD135/3.5:

MD50-135/3.5 @ 135mm:

MD75-150/4 @ 135mm:


f/5.6
MD135/3.5:

MD50-135/3.5 @ 135mm:

MD75-150/4 @ 135mm:


f/6.7
MD135/3.5:

MD50-135/3.5 @ 135mm:

MD75-150/4 @ 135mm:


f/8
MD135/3.5:

MD50-135/3.5 @ 135mm:

MD75-150/4 @ 135mm:


f/9.5
MD135/3.5:

MD50-135/3.5 @ 135mm:

MD75-150/4 @ 135mm:


f/11
MD135/3.5:

MD50-135/3.5 @ 135mm:

MD75-150/4 @ 135mm:




~85mm:

MD85/2:

MD75-150/4 @ "75mm":

Tamron SP35-80/2.8-3.8 @ "80mm":


f/2
MD85/2:


f/2.8
MD85/2:


f/3.4
MD85/2:


f/3.8 & f/4
MD85/2:

MD75-150/4 @ "75mm":

Tamron SP35-80/2.8-3.8 @ "80mm":


f/4.8
MD85/2:

Tamron SP35-80/2.8-3.8 @ "80mm":


f/5.6
MD85/2:

MD75-150/4 @ "75mm":

Tamron SP35-80/2.8-3.8 @ "80mm":


f/6.7
MD85/2:

MD75-150/4 @ "75mm":

Tamron SP35-80/2.8-3.8 @ "80mm":


f/8
MD85/2:

MD75-150/4 @ "75mm":

Tamron SP35-80/2.8-3.8 @ "80mm":


f/9.5
MD85/2:

MD75-150/4 @ "75mm":

Tamron SP35-80/2.8-3.8 @ "80mm":


Last edited by Boris_Akunin on Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:37 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The post got too long, here's the last bit:

f/11
MD85/2:

MD75-150/4 @ "75mm":

Tamron SP35-80/2.8-3.8 @ "80mm":


PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 1:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like 1 also what a great amount of work! Greatly appreciated.


PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 12:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here are the full test shots (click for full resolution):


MD75-150/4 @ 150mm:

MD135/3.5:

MD50-135/3.5 @ 135mm:

MD75-150/4 @ 135mm:

MD85/2:

MD75-150/4 @ 75mm:

Tamron SP 35-80/2.8-3.8 @ 80mm:


I've matched all exposures at the center to make the vignetting comparable, white balance is identical for all shots (using the MD85 at f/8 as the reference).


PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

excellent work boris Like 1 small

70-150/4 seems live up to its reputation. sharp wide open (almost as good as primes) and its has a very useful range Like Dog


PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Raxar wrote:
70-150/4 seems live up to its reputation. sharp wide open (almost as good as primes) and its has a very useful range Like Dog


Almost? It's certainly better than the MD135/3.5 and pretty much on par with the MD85/2 (I'd expect it to be on par with the 4/4 135/2.8 too).

The MD75-150 has quite heavy focus breathing. I don't know where it's nodal points are so the only way to directly measure the focal length would be with two points at a large known distance (I'd also have to know the distance between the points),
that's doable (e.g. using the moon or two bright stars) but I don't think I'll go that far.

I've tried to make an educated guess of the actual focal range through field-of-view comparisons (INF vs MFD, "75mm" vs "150mm" and against a few other lenses), I would need one direct FL measurment to really get it right but this get's me pretty close...

At "75mm" and MFD, the focal length is 24.3% longer than at infinity.
At "150mm" and MFD, the focal length is 30.9% longer than at infinity.
At "150mm" and infinity, the focal length is 93.4% longer than at "75mm" (and infinity).
At "150mm" and MFD, the focal length is 103.7% longer than at "75mm" (and MFD).

I took my MD85/2 for comparison:
At 1.2m (the MD75-150's MFD), the MD85's focal length is 15.8% longer than at infinity.
At infinity, the MD85's focal length is 5% longer than the MD75-150 at "75mm" (and infinity).
At 1.2m, the MD85's focal length is 2.3% shorter than the MD75-150 at "75mm" (and 1.2m).

IF the MD85 is exactly 85mm at infinity, the MD75-150 should actually be 81.0-156.6mm at infinity and 100.7-205.0mm at MFD. (and the MD85 would be 98.4mm at 1.2m, probably a bit beyond 100mm at it's MFD).

Using a Fuji 18-55/2.8-4 at "55mm" as the reference (on an X-E1, accounting for the crop factor -as precisely as it's known - of course):
IF the 18-55 at "55" is exactly 55mm at infinity, the MD75-150 should be 79.2-153.2mm at infinity and 98.5-200.5mm at MFD.

So, I'd guess the MD75-150 is ~80-155mm at infinity and ~100-200mm at MFD. Good to know...