View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:44 pm Post subject: 400 Tmax - blech |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
I find this film troublesome - it curls length wise and bows edge to edge, even after a day of flattening under weights. And dust seems to cling to it, no amount of brushing and blowing seems to get rid of the dust.
And, just to let you know: if you mistakenly develiop it as thought it was Ilford XP5+, you won't have the correct times... _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Seele
Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 741 Location: Sydney Australia
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seele wrote:
Nesster,
TMY is a very different film from TX and HP5+; in fact you can say they are opposites.
TX and HP5+ are shadow-biased films: they give you extra shadow contrast while maintaining overall contrast within a manageable level, so that the highlights will not blow out. In other words, by pushing TX or HP5+ (under-exposing and over-developing) you get true speed gains: the film is faster in the camera, and faster in the tank, so to speak.
TMY is a highlight-biased film, it tries to maintain highlight details but if you over-develop it, you get very little gain in shadow details, but the highlights will get blocked up.
In other words, pushing TMY is not a good idea: contrast shoots up and you get little real gain in speed as in getting shadow details, while you lose highlight details. In fact, when you use TMY you aim to get a negative which is a little on the thin and "flat" side to produce printable results. Process it as if TX or HP5+, or aiming to produce negatives with the same appearances, you will end up with negatives which are very tough to print. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
Very edifying information, thank you.
Yes, the TMY negatives are thin looking but scan OK. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Seele
Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 741 Location: Sydney Australia
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seele wrote:
Glad to be of help.
Another thought came to me: due to this characteristic of TMY, it is actually not a good film to use for reversal processing, the results would look very muddy. I found the best films for this purpose would be TMX and Delta 100. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:38 am Post subject: Re: 400 Tmax - blech |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Nesster wrote: |
I find this film troublesome - it curls length wise and bows edge to edge, even after a day of flattening under weights. And dust seems to cling to it, no amount of brushing and blowing seems to get rid of the dust. |
Yep, that is a definite no-shitter young Jussi! The two rolls I shot expired in
2002 and the first roll exhibits the same problems you said above.
I'm not gonna wait days to see if these straighten out, I'm scanning as soon
as they are dry. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
Unfortunately I have some more of that stuff... I developed a roll, it curls like Shirley Temple's hair, and is sitting under some weights now. I do hope the dust thing isn't going to be a constant, or else I have to dump the last two rolls, or pay someone else to develop the damn stuff. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Carlsson
Joined: 26 Jul 2008 Posts: 793 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Carlsson wrote:
Yes, I hate curling!
You can try to load the film in reverse order in to your reel. Let it rest there for at least 24 hours. Hope this helps. _________________
Contax III, Zeiss Ikon ZM, Contax AX, EOS 5D, R-D1
https://mariaeero.com/contax/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6943 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Hmm... I just bought some of this to compare with HP5.
Are we talking 120 film here? _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
It was better in 120, the 35mm is what bugs me
When it does work, it is very good indeed, the film _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|