View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:50 pm Post subject: 35mm F8.0 P&S lens |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Anyone interested?
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/126995799/the-worlds-first-fastest-and-coolest-always-in-foc/description _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you.
Last edited by calvin83 on Wed Jul 12, 2017 12:32 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
y
Joined: 11 Aug 2013 Posts: 304 Location: EU
|
Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2017 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
y wrote:
$250?
$1000 or $5000 would surely match this fixed f/8 Tessar pancake better... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2017 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
For pixel-peepers f/8 would not always be in focus enough to satisfy.
35mm is much too long to do decent hyperfocal at f/8.
If you want to hyperfocal on 4/3 or Nex APS-C there are 25mm Chinese c-mounts for $30 that are excellent at f/8 and only marginally larger, with which one could do the same thing, better probably.
For A7 there are 35mm lenses of various kinds that can do this too. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2017 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Not even remotely close to resembling interest, It would have to have amazing IQ rivalling the Otis 28mm for me to give up focus and aperture control. All just to turn my A7r into a smartphone camera....
I already have my Rolleistar 40/2.5 which is about as small as I'd ever really want.
My Rolleistar is the lens from a Rollei XF35 transplanted into an Industar 50, pics are tagged in my Flickr. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TrueLoveOne
Joined: 30 Sep 2012 Posts: 1840 Location: Netherlands
Expire: 2013-12-24
|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2017 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
TrueLoveOne wrote:
First thing i noticed: "The angle of view corresponds with your natural viewing angle."
His complete story is based on full-frame, yet he nowhere mentions it. Buyers who use a crop camera will get angle of view from a standard lens (1.5/1.6) or even a 70mm short tele (2x).
Still, amazing how many people do not seem to think about simple facts and just buy..... so many options to create the same effect, as stated above already, and most probably within your own collection of lenses.
B.t.w.: C.P. Goerz? I always wonder if old names like this can be used freely or if they really bought the rights (if that is even possible).
Cheers, René! _________________ My Flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/chantalrene/
Sony A7, Canon 5D mkII, Minolta 7D + RD3000 and some more.....
Minolta and Konica collector.... slowly selling all the other stuff! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1054 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2017 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
They say they want to revolutionize the street photography with this lens...
Well, I'm waiting for their next step: a fixed lens for the creamy-Bokeh lovers - a permanently out of focus fixed lens with a nice, creamy Bokeh all over the frame.
It will be a true revolution in lens design |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fatdeeman
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 Posts: 780 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2017 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fatdeeman wrote:
They are just taking advantage of people who are interested enough in photography to want to try cool things but not knowledgeable enough to know they could get the exact same result with any normal lens. I think it's really deceitful. _________________ - Dave
www.lensporn.net
www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/
DSLR: Canon EOS 60D, Samsung GX-1S (Pentax *ist DS2)
Mirrorless: Panasonic DMC-G1, Sony NEX-5N
Compact: Canon PowerShot G3
Lenses:
Wide: Tokina RMC 28mm F/2.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 28mm F/2.5, Sun Optical 28mm F/2.5, Super paragon 28mm F/2.8, Sigma filtermatic 24mm F/2.8, Fujinon 35mm F/2.8, Sun Optical 35mm F/2.8
Standard: Industar 50-2, Helios 44-2, Helios 44M, Helios 44M-3, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.4, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.7, Pentax-M 50mm F/2, Ricoh 50mm F/1.7, Chinon 50mm F/1.7
Tele: Pentacon 135mm F/2.8, Pentacon 200mm F/3.5, Optomax 200mm f/3.5, Sun Optical 135mm F/3.5, Soligor 350mm F/5.6
Zoom: Tokina 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 SZ-X270 SD, Sigma Zoom Pi 35-200mm F4-5.6, Sun Optical 28-80mm F/3.5-4.5, Sunagor 80-205mm F/3.8, Tokina RMC 80-200mm F/4, Vivitar 70-150mm F/3.8, Tamron 95-205mm F/6.3, Tamron Adaptall 28-200mm F/3.8-5.6 LD Aspherical, Tokina RMC 70-210mm F/3.5
Mirror: Falcon (Samyang) 800mm F/8, MTO-11CA 1000mm F/10, Tamron Adaptall 2 500mm F/8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
A very similar hyperfocal idea, but implemented with an actual aperture mechanism, going to f/64, look for
Loreo Lens in a cap
$29.95
Very Holga-ish results as one would expect with such a setup.
But priced more like the toy it is. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spokklocka
Joined: 14 Jan 2015 Posts: 50
|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spokklocka wrote:
fatdeeman wrote: |
They are just taking advantage of people who are interested enough in photography to want to try cool things but not knowledgeable enough to know they could get the exact same result with any normal lens. |
Exact same result with any 35mm adapted legacy lens if you tape the aperture ring at f/8 and the focus ring at whatever's hyperfocal (won't be the infinity mark).That will also be larger.
fatdeeman wrote: |
I think it's really deceitful.
|
I don't, do people who buy a dslr without much knowledge typically trawl kickstarter campaigns or do they tend to stay with the kit lens and then get whatever Canon lens the local store will suggest they get?
I would think the USD599* suggested retail price will make people who know nothing about their interchangeable lens camera except what mount it has will either make them pause and ask a friend / local store, or, if price isn't a concern, it might actually make them take better photos.
*Wow, USD599, wow, I would much rather get the Samyang 35 2,8 even if I can't tape the focus ring (it's by-wire). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1054 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
Speaking seriously, a 35 mm. modern hyperfocal lens could be really interesting.
IMO, due to the technological advances the lens could have an inner inclination sensor and it could tilt some inner lenses to generate, due to the Scheimpflug effect, an 0-infinity DOF at all openings on the horizontal plane. The diaphragm should be closed (probably an f/4-f/5.6 would be sufficient) only to compensate for the DOF on verticals.
Or it won't even need a sensor - a "standard" tilt on V or H (automatically changed by the V or H camera orientation) + an ~f/4-f/5.6 could be sufficient. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|