Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Petri C.C. Auto 55mm f1.8
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2024 9:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i just had the 1.8 version dissasembled for cla and on the rear group there is a cemented pair that has some haze inside of it, the weird thing is that it is seated inside metal screwed caps front and rear. I´m not sure if they are cemented together or they are glued together (in this case i might try to open it i guess). Besides, the final image has the extreme right side softer than the left one up to f8, i will have to try other lenses to see if there is some issue with the adapter.


PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2024 12:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In case someone is still interested in Petri lenses: I wrote an article about the 1.8/55 (6 lens double Gauss Design) and particularly the 1.4/55 (7 lens design, very similar to the famous Pancolar 1.4/55) with bayonet mount: Petri 1.4/55 and 1.8/55. Much of the information I researched came from the Japanese Petri Wiki.
There have also been questions about their ancestor the famous Kuribayashi Orikkor 2/50, which is a marvel of a lens and for its time outstanding. It's quite a bit smaller than the newer lenses (but dense), more like a Canon or Leica rangefinder lens. It also has a 7 lens design, but is quite different from the more modern designs with 4 lenses in front of the diaphragm. Check it out at Lens-DB: Kuribayashi Orikkor 2/50. Its mount is M42.


PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2024 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

backsidewalkaround wrote:
In case someone is still interested in Petri lenses: I wrote an article about the 1.8/55 (6 lens double Gauss Design) and particularly the 1.4/55 (7 lens design, very similar to the famous Pancolar 1.4/55) with bayonet mount: Petri 1.4/55 and 1.8/55. Much of the information I researched came from the Japanese Petri Wiki.
There have also been questions about their ancestor the famous Kuribayashi Orikkor 2/50, which is a marvel of a lens and for its time outstanding. It's quite a bit smaller than the newer lenses (but dense), more like a Canon or Leica rangefinder lens. It also has a 7 lens design, but is quite different from the more modern designs with 4 lenses in front of the diaphragm. Check it out at Lens-DB: Kuribayashi Orikkor 2/50. Its mount is M42.


Yes I know your article, very well written! I have both of them. They’re great bokeh lenses. The 55/1.8 is exceptional as a landscape lens as well (very sharp from corner to corner without having to stop down too much).


PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2024 7:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

caspert79 wrote:


Yes I know your article, very well written! I have both of them. They’re great bokeh lenses. The 55/1.8 is exceptional as a landscape lens as well (very sharp from corner to corner without having to stop down too much).


Thanks. Do you also have the tiny Kuribayashi Orikkor 2/50 (M42)? It's also a great lens, but its bokeh has lots of "character". In my opinion it's a lens worth having. Often it's quite expensive, but if you look for a Petri Penta, it might be attatched to it and much cheaper.

It is quite hard to search the Petri Wiki. I found the old brochures most informative (well, a few of them):

This is the site, where you can find the Brochures.

For instance (PDF):

Petri Catalogue containing lens scheme of the 1.8/55

Petri Catalogue containing lens scheme of the 1.4/55


PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2024 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

backsidewalkaround wrote:
caspert79 wrote:


Yes I know your article, very well written! I have both of them. They’re great bokeh lenses. The 55/1.8 is exceptional as a landscape lens as well (very sharp from corner to corner without having to stop down too much).


Thanks. Do you also have the tiny Kuribayashi Orikkor 2/50 (M42)? It's also a great lens, but its bokeh has lots of "character". In my opinion it's a lens worth having. Often it's quite expensive, but if you look for a Petri Penta, it might be attatched to it and much cheaper.

It is quite hard to search the Petri Wiki. I found the old brochures most informative (well, a few of them):

This is the site, where you can find the Brochures.

For instance (PDF):

Petri Catalogue containing lens scheme of the 1.8/55

Petri Catalogue containing lens scheme of the 1.4/55


Nope, don’t have that one. I’ll keep my eyes open.