View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1146
|
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2024 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
i just had the 1.8 version dissasembled for cla and on the rear group there is a cemented pair that has some haze inside of it, the weird thing is that it is seated inside metal screwed caps front and rear. I´m not sure if they are cemented together or they are glued together (in this case i might try to open it i guess). Besides, the final image has the extreme right side softer than the left one up to f8, i will have to try other lenses to see if there is some issue with the adapter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
backsidewalkaround
Joined: 22 Jan 2018 Posts: 26 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2024 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
backsidewalkaround wrote:
In case someone is still interested in Petri lenses: I wrote an article about the 1.8/55 (6 lens double Gauss Design) and particularly the 1.4/55 (7 lens design, very similar to the famous Pancolar 1.4/55) with bayonet mount: Petri 1.4/55 and 1.8/55. Much of the information I researched came from the Japanese Petri Wiki.
There have also been questions about their ancestor the famous Kuribayashi Orikkor 2/50, which is a marvel of a lens and for its time outstanding. It's quite a bit smaller than the newer lenses (but dense), more like a Canon or Leica rangefinder lens. It also has a 7 lens design, but is quite different from the more modern designs with 4 lenses in front of the diaphragm. Check it out at Lens-DB: Kuribayashi Orikkor 2/50. Its mount is M42. _________________ My Outlet
My Altglas(s)-Blog |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 2938 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2024 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
backsidewalkaround wrote: |
In case someone is still interested in Petri lenses: I wrote an article about the 1.8/55 (6 lens double Gauss Design) and particularly the 1.4/55 (7 lens design, very similar to the famous Pancolar 1.4/55) with bayonet mount: Petri 1.4/55 and 1.8/55. Much of the information I researched came from the Japanese Petri Wiki.
There have also been questions about their ancestor the famous Kuribayashi Orikkor 2/50, which is a marvel of a lens and for its time outstanding. It's quite a bit smaller than the newer lenses (but dense), more like a Canon or Leica rangefinder lens. It also has a 7 lens design, but is quite different from the more modern designs with 4 lenses in front of the diaphragm. Check it out at Lens-DB: Kuribayashi Orikkor 2/50. Its mount is M42. |
Yes I know your article, very well written! I have both of them. They’re great bokeh lenses. The 55/1.8 is exceptional as a landscape lens as well (very sharp from corner to corner without having to stop down too much). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
backsidewalkaround
Joined: 22 Jan 2018 Posts: 26 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2024 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
backsidewalkaround wrote:
caspert79 wrote: |
Yes I know your article, very well written! I have both of them. They’re great bokeh lenses. The 55/1.8 is exceptional as a landscape lens as well (very sharp from corner to corner without having to stop down too much). |
Thanks. Do you also have the tiny Kuribayashi Orikkor 2/50 (M42)? It's also a great lens, but its bokeh has lots of "character". In my opinion it's a lens worth having. Often it's quite expensive, but if you look for a Petri Penta, it might be attatched to it and much cheaper.
It is quite hard to search the Petri Wiki. I found the old brochures most informative (well, a few of them):
This is the site, where you can find the Brochures.
For instance (PDF):
Petri Catalogue containing lens scheme of the 1.8/55
Petri Catalogue containing lens scheme of the 1.4/55 _________________ My Outlet
My Altglas(s)-Blog |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 2938 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2024 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
backsidewalkaround wrote: |
caspert79 wrote: |
Yes I know your article, very well written! I have both of them. They’re great bokeh lenses. The 55/1.8 is exceptional as a landscape lens as well (very sharp from corner to corner without having to stop down too much). |
Thanks. Do you also have the tiny Kuribayashi Orikkor 2/50 (M42)? It's also a great lens, but its bokeh has lots of "character". In my opinion it's a lens worth having. Often it's quite expensive, but if you look for a Petri Penta, it might be attatched to it and much cheaper.
It is quite hard to search the Petri Wiki. I found the old brochures most informative (well, a few of them):
This is the site, where you can find the Brochures.
For instance (PDF):
Petri Catalogue containing lens scheme of the 1.8/55
Petri Catalogue containing lens scheme of the 1.4/55 |
Nope, don’t have that one. I’ll keep my eyes open. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|