| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 2441
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:32 am Post subject: Voigtlander 125mm f/2.5 Macro APO-Lanthar sample pics topic |
 |
|
Esox lucius wrote:
| Quote: |
I don't want to sound like a prick or anything like that.
There seems to be far more posts about the price of this lens than post of pictures taken with it  |
Please post here photos and links to photosets taken with the Voigtländer SL 125/2.5 Macro APO-Lanthar, regardless of mount version and camera used. Share your experience on the lens. Discuss photos.
This topic is not for discussing price trends or collectors ruining availability on the aftermarket. This topic is not for posting eBay links and certainly not for complaining about how expensive it has become.
Mflenses photo posts
http://forum.mflenses.com/makro-apo-lanthar-2-5-125mm-product-shots-t22054,highlight,apo+lanthar.html
http://forum.mflenses.com/two-out-of-three-now-voigtlaender-apo-lanthars-t16939,highlight,apo+lanthar.html
http://forum.mflenses.com/apo-makro-lanthar-125mm-peonies-and-more-t16701,highlight,apo+lanthar.html
100% APO-Lanthar (90/3.5, 125/2.5 and 180/4) photoset, most uploaded original size: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mureena/sets/72157623301462060/
I use my 125/2.5 about twice per week. I bought it because I can improve profit margins of product shoots: I get out of camera results that require none, zero, nada post-processing. Most jobs I do with this lens require quality good for poster-size prints. Many times photos are of unreleased products, thus I can't post samples. Product managers usually want informative, not artistic product shoots. There is not much artistic merit in catalogue photography I think, but maybe I should post them nevertheless.
Some test shots (I got the lens only 4 weeks ago)
This is what I intend to use this lens for, when I shoot what I want (not what pays the bills)
100% crop of lower right corner from above photo (sharpening 4 on a scale of 0...9)
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/mfl_club_members/esoxlucius/125apolanthar/_ND31736crop.jpg.html?g2_imageViewsIndex=1
_________________
Vilhelm
Nikon DSLR: D4, D800, Nikon D3, D70
Nikon SLR: Nikon F100, Nikon FM2n
Nikkor MF: 20/2.8 Ai-S, 24/2 Ai-S, 24/2.8 Ai-S, 28/2 Ai-S, 28/2.8 Ai-S, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 Ai-S, 45/2.8 GN, 50/1.2 Ai, 50/1.2 Ai-S, 50/1.4 Ai, 50/1.4 Ai-S, 50/1.8 AI-S "long", 50/1.8 AI-S "short", 55/1.2 Ai, 85/1.4 Ai-S, 85/1.8H, 105/2.5 Ai, 135/2.8Q, 135/3.5 Ai, 180/2.8 Ai-S ED
Nikkor AF/AF-S FX: 14-24/2.8G, 16/2.8D Fisheye, 16-35/4G VR, 17-35/2.8D, 24/1.4G, 24/3.5D PC-E, 24/2.8D, 24-70/2.8G, 28/1.4D, 28/1.8G, 35/1.4G, 35/2D, 50/1.4D, 50/1.4G, 50/1.8G, 60/2.8 Micro, 60/2.8G Micro, 70-200/2.8G VR, 70-200/2.8G VR II, 80-400/4.5-5.6D VR, 85/1.4G, 85/2.8D PC-E Micro, 105/2D DC, 105/2.8G VR Micro, 135/2D DC, 200/2G VR, 200-400/4G VR, 300/2.8G VR, 300/4D ED, 400/2.8G VR, 800/5.6E VR
Nikkor AF/AF-S DX: 10.5/2.8G Fisheye, 12-24/4G, 18-70/3.5-4.5G
Topcor: Auto-Topcor 58/1.4,
Voigtländer SL: 40/2 Ultron, 58/1.4 Nokton, 75/2.5 Color-Heliar, 90/3.5 APO-Lanthar, 125/2.5 APO-Lanthar, 180/4 APO-Lanthar
Zeiss ZF: Planar T* 85/1.4 ZF
M42 SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM
M42: Flektogon 20/4, Flektogon 35/2.4, Tessar 50/2.8 T, Super-Takumar 55/1.8, Biotar 58/2 T, Pentacon 135/2.8, Sonnar 135/3.5
Medium format: several Zeiss Super Ikonta 532/16 Opton-Tessar 80mm f/2.8, Zeiss Ikonta 524/16 Opton-Tessar 75mm f/3.5
Leica: R7, M4, Super-Angulon-R 4/21, Elmarit-R 2.8/28, Summicron-R 2/35, Summicron-M 2/35, Summicron-M 2/50, Elmarit-R 2,8/180
Last edited by Esox lucius on Tue Oct 12, 2010 6:12 pm; edited 4 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008
Posts: 2495
Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
Well... 
what I like:
- superior sharpness and resolution
- very good contrast and colors
- interesting bokeh - not busy, but also not as smooth to be boring
- f/2.5
- very good chromatical correction
- design of the lens (entirely as is)... the silver front part doesn't only look nice, but it's also quite robust and protects the filter thread
what I don't like:
- nothing between f/2.5 and f/4... at least f/3.2 would be appreciated
what could be better:
- the black painting is slightly prone to scratches
- when used for distant subjects, focusing is extremely sensitive
subjective feeling:
Despite the 125/2.5 is my most expensive lens, I never regreted the purchase (I can't say this about many other lenses). It's simply great.
a few of my 125/2.5 shots:
  
  
photos I found on the net:
http://simedarby.multiply.com/photos/album/16/Voigtlander_Macro-APO_Lanthar_125_F2.5_Photo_Sample#
http://my.reset.jp/~cat.y/mapo125mm/125mm.html
http://www.pbase.com/piotreks/vls125
http://www.flickr.com/groups/825863@N22/
http://www.pbase.com/felinda/voigtlander_
http://www.pbase.com/szaitsev/voigtlander
reviews:
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/267-voigtlander-sl-125mm-f25-apo-lanthar-test-report--review
http://www.slrlensreview.com/web/voigtlander-slr-lenses-132/macro-slr-lenses-137/367-voigtlander-apo-lanthar-macro-125mm-f25-sl-lens-review.html
_________________
(almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
supahmario
Joined: 18 Mar 2009
Posts: 615
Location: Berlin, Germany
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
supahmario wrote:
WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW....
did i already say "WOW"?
colors and sharpness are simply stunning!
_________________
EOS 5D, EOS 30
Leica-R: Summicron 2/50
QBM: Distagon 2.8/35
PK: Tokina 3.5/17, Porst 1.2/55
M42: S-M-C Takumar 3.5/24, S-M-C Takumar 1.8/55, CZJ MC Sonnar 3.5/135, Jupiter 21M 4/200
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 3237
Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
Waiting for the Cosina to bring out the new version.
Hoping for a better price.
Still patient, still patient, st.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 2441
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
Some more photos posted here on Mflenses
http://forum.mflenses.com/the-apo-lanthar-trio-t19795.html
http://forum.mflenses.com/sun-snow-and-ice-voigtlaender-apo-lanthar-trio-original-s-t25260.html
Thanks to Klaus and Björn Rörslett's scientific reviews, I knew what I was buying and why I paid premium for getting it.
My preliminary thoughts after 4 weeks of use:
Things to consider
- "Expensive" is subjective. If you use the lens to make income from photography, payback time is more important than price paid. You know if you have use for it. Thanks to optical quality post-processing can really be minimal, something I appreciate with catalogue product shots.
- 125mm macro shooting is different from 60mm macro shooting, not just by perspective but also shutter.
- Almost any lens can impress with web sized images, few impress with 70x100cm prints
- Is manual focusing difficult? If you need to ask this question you don't need this lens.
Things I dislike about the lens
- Price/availability. I sincerely wish Cosina re-introduced the lens. The increasing value is a nuisance to me, it means I pay higher insurance fees and in case of accident or loss replacing it is very difficult. Collectors probably want the value to keep increasing, I wish for the opposite.
Things I like a lot about the lens
- Engineering. The lens has a hand-built, exquisite feeling to using it. All details have been carefully thought out: barrel markings on focusing (1:2 and 1:1), focusing feel, hood lock, lens hood design, lens barrel design, focus throw optimized for macro precision
- Just a hint of vignetting wide open, gone at f/4. Beautiful bokeh, rounded diaphragm, absence of CA, beautiful colors, crisp detail... everything you wish for in a lens.
- Build quality. Solid metal and glass. Precision crafted tolerances. Beautiful design.
- Optical quality is uncompromised. Sweet spot is reported to be f/5.6. Like Björn Rörslett commented; In practice optical quality is so good, that you can set the lens to the aperture you wish and release the shutter.
- Results. There is no need for post-processing. None. Colors, detail, lack of aberrations. Out of camera RAW results are appreciated when you have a catalogue of 200 shots to PP
- Versatility. Unlike some Nikkor macro lenses, it is in fact very good also at medium to infinity focusing distances.
Nikon-specific user notes
- Aperture control. On Nikon N/Ai-S version I have the following f-stops "clicking" in position: 2.5 - 4 - 4.5 - 5.6 - 6.3 - 8 - 9 - 11 -16 - 22. In addition to this, I can fine-tune exposure by gently moving aperture ring for stepless aperture control. Try it, it works!
- No chip. No real impact for me; on a Nikon D3 I get spot metering, matrix metering, Aperture Priority - everything I need. The D3 menu has a slot for unchipped lenses; enter focal length and max aperture --> voilà! Downside is Nikon only has included focal lengths of Nikkors, thus 105mm and 135mm are available as options, but no 125mm. This is a small nuisance, as it will only affect the EXIF data that is recorded for focal length.
Last edited by Esox lucius on Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:26 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thePiRaTE!!
Joined: 31 Oct 2008
Posts: 416
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thePiRaTE!! wrote:
| no-X wrote: |
Well...
what I like:
- superior sharpness and resolution
- very good contrast and colors
- interesting bokeh - not busy, but also not as smooth to be boring
- f/2.5
- very good chromatical correction
- design of the lens (entirely as is)... the silver front part doesn't only look nice, but it's also quite robust and protects the filter thread
what I don't like:
- nothing between f/2.5 and f/4... at least f/3.2 would be appreciated
what could be better:
- the black painting is slightly prone to scratches
- when used for distant subjects, focusing is extremely sensitive
subjective feeling:
Despite the 125/2.5 is my most expensive lens, I never regreted the purchase (I can't say this about many other lenses). It's simply great. |
I agree word for word with this assessment. To go further on the statement of focusing on distant subjects, I would add mine on PK had a significant overfocusing on infinity. It was necessary to be very patient thus when shooting at infinity. I found all my CV lenses except the Nokton had this trait to some degree, though none was as obvious as the 125.
A very useful lens with no drawbacks at all. I was amazed they were half the price of the Zeiss Makro Planar 100/2 while they were sold new considering they were both made by the same folks to the same quality. I used to say the price was part of its strength.
| Himself wrote: |
Waiting for the Cosina to bring out the new version.
Hoping for a better price.
Still patient, still patient, st.... |
+1. Hopefully they will consider more mounts than just K and F.
So very many nice pics from you all with this lens, congrats and thanks for sharing. Here also is a link to some of my pics with this lens (please click the 'photos' tab after you reach the link).
http://kellysereda.com/?q=125mm
Kelly.
_________________
kellysereda.com
Sony A7ii, A900, NEX-5
_______________________
Helios: 1.5/85 40-2.
Meyer-Optik: Trioplan 2.8/100, Oreston 1.8/50.
Minolta: Rokkor-PG 1.2/58.
Porst: 1.2/55 Color Reflex.
Sony: 4-5.6/70-400 G.
Takumar: Super Takumar 3.5/135, Super Takumar 1.4/50, SMC Takumar 3.5/28.
Topcon: Topcor 1.4/58.
Voigtländer: Nokton Classic SC 1.4/35.
Zeiss: Planar T*1.2/85 "60 jahre" C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*3.4/35-70 C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*2.8/16-35 ZA, Distagon T*2/24 ZA.
lenses for sale here |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 5486
Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
Great Thread Idea Vilhelm
This lens deserves an open thread if any does.
I love this one.
_________________
Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 2:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Piotr Sobolewski, a member of this forum has this lens and many others. He has a wonderful gallery of images from this lens here:
http://www.pbase.com/piotreks/vls125
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Oops, sorry, didn't see his link was already posted. Take the opportunity to back up a level and see galleries from all his other wonderful lenses.
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008
Posts: 2495
Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
| Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
_________________
(almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 2441
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
The composition and use of depth of field is like an optical illusion! Love it  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 5486
Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
_________________
Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 3614
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
| Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
yes! fantastic picture .. from another planet ..
tf
_________________
Flickr.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008
Posts: 2495
Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
| Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
Thanks 
My plan was take picture of the blooming amarylis, but I wasn't successful with finding a good background, so I shoted only the anthers and used the bloom as background...
_________________
(almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16623
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Excellent work Jiri!!
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 17633
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
| Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
I guess, even as a Leica (and Nikkor) lover I need to admit that this is an absolutely fantastic lens.
Excellent shots, gentlemen!
_________________
Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator 
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
james
Joined: 25 Sep 2009
Posts: 308
Expire: 2011-12-28
|
| Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
james wrote:
A roof's edge in Tuscany (Nikon D700 + CV 125):
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009
Posts: 1525
Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
| Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
Here are a few of mine
_________________
Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NikonD
Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Posts: 1922
Location: Slovenija
|
| Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NikonD wrote:
great colors rawhead! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 3614
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
| Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
excellent and nice pictures ..
but rawhead -- how did you take the picture of that leaf??
that's unbelievable!!!
tf
_________________
Flickr.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009
Posts: 1525
Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
| Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
| NikonD wrote: |
| great colors rawhead! |
Thanks
| trifox wrote: |
but rawhead -- how did you take the picture of that leaf??
|
Looks cool, doesn't it?
While it looks like a leaf that is falling, it was in fact a leaf that was suspended in mid-air by some kind of thin bug thread (some kind of caterpillar maybe? Probably not spider thread).
Not to say it was stationary and easy to shoot. Hardly. It was quite windy, and the thread must have been at least 3m long... the leaf was hanginf rom a branch that was way over my head.
Which meant that this leaf was dancing around all over the place. I sat there mesmerized by the scene, then furiously shot about a 100 frames (thank god to digital), and this is one of the 15-20 frames or so that came out above decent in terms of sharpness, etc.
Thanks!
_________________
Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008
Posts: 2495
Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
| Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
Awesome shots - bokeh, colors, ideas... great!
_________________
(almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
a20010494
Joined: 15 Feb 2010
Posts: 396
Location: Perú.
|
| Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
a20010494 wrote:
Absolutely... mar-ve-lous. Great gear, good hand!
_________________
www.estudiocaleidoscopio.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Piotrek
Joined: 27 Apr 2009
Posts: 45
Location: Warsaw/Poland
|
| Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 9:03 pm Post subject: not so bad lens - good for macro, portraits and landscapes |
|
|
Piotrek wrote:
Pentax *ist DS ,Voigtlander 125mm f/2.5 SL Macro APO-Lanthar
1/180s f/3.5 at 125.0mm iso400
Pentax *ist DS ,Voigtlander 125mm f/2.5 SL Macro APO-Lanthar
1/500s f/2.4 at 125.0mm iso400
Pentax K20D ,Voigtlander 125mm f/2.5 SL Macro APO-Lanthar
1/160s f/5.6 at 120.0mm iso200
Pentax K20D ,Voigtlander 125mm f/2.5 SL Macro APO-Lanthar
1/400s f/8.0 at 125.0mm iso100
_________________
Piotr
www.pbase.com/piotreks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
exaklaus
Joined: 11 Aug 2009
Posts: 1633
Location: Niederrhein, Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
| Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 9:41 pm Post subject: Re: not so bad lens - good for macro, portraits and landscap |
|
|
exaklaus wrote:
| Piotrek wrote: |
Pentax *ist DS ,Voigtlander 125mm f/2.5 SL Macro APO-Lanthar
1/180s f/3.5 at 125.0mm iso400
|
Hard to believe, that this shot was made with f3,5!
Klaus
_________________
my Ebay auctions
Canon 5D II,
Fuji GW690III, Fuji G617, Fujifilm X-E1
Bessaflex TM
Tachihara 4"x5"
Summilux-R 1:1,4/50
Canon FD 85mm 1:1,2
Color-Heliar 75mm F2.5 SL
www.autoselbstfotografie.de
www.classic-cameras-and-lenses.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
