Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamesdak wrote:
Wow! That is one big lens. In my book though the price sort of kills it. I'm using the 560/6.8 because at under $1000 it was a cost effective purchase. But if I spent the same amount of money as they want for that lens I could get the Canon 600/4 and a wimberly head, team it with my 1.4 and be there with IS and AF.
But still, a very cool lens.
DickB, wise purchase on the XD-7. I have one that I will never part with. It is my favorite MF Minolta body:
_________________ MF lenses: Contax Zeiss 28/2.8, 35/2.8, 50/1.4,
85/2.8, 100/2.0, 135/2.8
Leica 50/2.0, 60/2.8 macro, 90/2.8, 135/2.8, 180/3.4, 560/6.8
Pentax SMC 50/1.4, SMC 135/3.5,
Olympus OM 24/2.8, 35/2.8 PC
Vivitar 90/2.5 macro
Nikon 800/5.6
DSLR, Canon 5D and 40D
About a dozen Minolta mf bodies and the same in Minolta MF lenses. |