| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Asa100
Joined: 15 Jul 2008
Posts: 57
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:11 pm Post subject: 50mm test |
 |
|
Asa100 wrote:
interesting test on 50mm lenses
Helios 44, one of the best.
Sorry for my bad English
http://bsuaudea.club.fr/test/50/test%2050.html
Last edited by Asa100 on Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:18 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChrisLilley
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 1767
Location: Nice, France
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:17 pm Post subject: Re: 50mm test |
|
|
ChrisLilley wrote:
| Asa100 wrote: |
interesting test on 50mm lenses
Helios 44, one of the best.
Sorry for my bad English
Test des 50 millimètres |
Thanks for the link (corrected syntax in above quote). Welcome to MFLenses!
_________________
Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ai'ed, AiS
Camera: Nikon D90, D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 K, AI'ed | N.K. Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor-N.C 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | ЛЗОС (LZOS) Юпитер-9 (Jupiter-9) 85mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 90mm f/3.5 SL | Nikkor-P 105mm f/2.5 pre-Ai, Ai'ed | Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 | Schneider Kreuznach Componon 105mm f/5.6 | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 ED AiS | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Asa100
Joined: 15 Jul 2008
Posts: 57
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:20 pm Post subject: Re: 50mm test |
|
|
Asa100 wrote:
| ChrisLilley wrote: |
| Asa100 wrote: |
interesting test on 50mm lenses
Helios 44, one of the best.
Sorry for my bad English
Test des 50 millimètres |
Thanks for the link (corrected syntax in above quote). Welcome to MFLenses! |
Thanks for the correction  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Welcome to at our forum! Thank you for joining us!
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 17633
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Welcome!
I am not sure if I understand the test correctly, but as far as I have understood the EF 1.8/50 II doesn't seem to perform well.
But the example shots show a different result, IMHO...
_________________
Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator 
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Asa100
Joined: 15 Jul 2008
Posts: 57
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Asa100 wrote:
| LucisPictor wrote: |
Welcome!
I am not sure if I understand the test correctly, but as far as I have understood the EF 1.8/50 II doesn't seem to perform well.
But the example shots show a different result, IMHO... |
The rating is more to less. Above, poor performance. Below, good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 17633
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
| Asa100 wrote: |
| LucisPictor wrote: |
Welcome!
I am not sure if I understand the test correctly, but as far as I have understood the EF 1.8/50 II doesn't seem to perform well.
But the example shots show a different result, IMHO... |
The rating is more to less. Above, poor performance. Below, good. |
Ah, OK. Then it performed pretty well, just according to my experience with this "plastic fantastic". 
_________________
Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
