View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Bololoco
Joined: 14 Feb 2025 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 3:34 pm Post subject: Convert Telephoto adapter to Macro focus |
|
|
Bololoco wrote:
I've just bought a Helios 3x auto teleconverter from that most popular auction site. It was sold as spares or repairs, so it was very cheap.
It appears to be in excellent condition, except for its ability to focus...I initially thought it was broken as I tried taking a picture of the view from my lounge window and it was just a blurry mess but then I realised that it happily focuses at a close distance, so I was wondering whether it had been modified to become a macro focusing adapter.
Is that possible and if so, how do I go about restoring it to be a normal teleconverter again? Is it a point of putting the glass in the other way round?
How easy are these teleconverters to strip down?
Does anyone have a link to where I can buy decent lens repair tools? They don't have to be the most expensive, they just have to do their job well. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jamaeolus
 Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 3034 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
I'm not familiar with the lens in question. Could you post a photo? As to repair kits there are options on "that popular auction site". You will likely need a set of small screwdrivers, a set of rubber lens wrenches, and an adjustable spanner wrench.
Two types of spanner wrenches, rubber lens wrenches, and a small screwdriver kit with a multitude of different interchangeable bits.
The rubber wrench set and the spanners were from ebay at Japan Toy and Hobby. The screwdriver set I got locally at a woodworking specialty store. They no longer have them and I have tried unsuccessfully to locate that same kit online. Similar kits should be available online though. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bololoco
Joined: 14 Feb 2025 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bololoco wrote:
I may have put this in the wrong section....apologies
It's actually a teleconverter, although i suppose that's a lens...of sorts
It's a very common one but here's a pic all the same
#1
I was rather hoping for a link to the necessary tools...preferably from someone who's bought them and can verify they're good |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
e6filmuser
 Joined: 12 Nov 2010 Posts: 972 Location: Reading UK
|
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 11:44 am Post subject: Re: Convert Telephoto adapter to Macro focus |
|
|
e6filmuser wrote:
Bololoco wrote: |
It appears to be in excellent condition, except for its ability to focus...I initially thought it was broken as I tried taking a picture of the view from my lounge window and it was just a blurry mess but then I realised that it happily focuses at a close distance, so I was wondering whether it had been modified to become a macro focusing adapter. |
The only thing a teleconverter is supposed to focus on is the image from the lens to which it is attached and which it magnifies. It looks like it requires a threaded lens, M42?
Although I can't quote anything, x3 converters were generally thought to be of inferior quality to x2 ones. _________________ Dedicated to using manual focus lenses with digital. Equiped for photography from macro to panoramic & from ultra-wide to extreme telephoto. Mostly shooting outdoor macro. Experienced entomological taxonomist. Some knowledge of mushrooms. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bololoco
Joined: 14 Feb 2025 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 4:30 pm Post subject: Re: Convert Telephoto adapter to Macro focus |
|
|
Bololoco wrote:
e6filmuser wrote: |
The only thing a teleconverter is supposed to focus on is the image from the lens to which it is attached and which it magnifies. It looks like it requires a threaded lens, M42?
Although I can't quote anything, x3 converters were generally thought to be of inferior quality to x2 ones. |
To be honest, the mirror lens is soft AF already, so I lowering the quality isn't really too much of an issue. I just want it to work.
And yes it is an M42 but that's not important.
So i'll ask the question again since I haven't had an answer yet...
can you turn a telephoto lens into a macro focusing lens by reversing the glass? This telephoto only seems to manage to focus on close objects, not distant horizons, so I was wondering whether it had been altered and could I turn it back into a telephoto lens again? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
marcusBMG
 Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1339 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
mmm a teleconverter is just a compound negative lens, I would have thought most of them would be optically similar reversed - looking through a tamron 2x tc one way and then the other, virtually no difference. However the spacing of the elements from one end vs the other is very different so that could certainly produce big focus differences if it was used the other way round by swapping the male and female mounts on the ends, or if the optical block had been remounted in the shell the other way round.
But to echo previous comment, these 3x tc's are optical junk tbh
Take the optics out and use it as an extension tube. _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DConvert
 Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 939 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
This looks longer than my variable M42 TC (which switches between 2x & 3x by changing the order of it's two parks).
I have several macro TCs & they all have a helicoid section, so I don't think it was intended to work as it now does.
Is there any sign that a previous owner has 'serviced' it? If so they might have put it back together wrong (elements reversed or perhaps swapped).
In any event the optical quality will be disappointing on digital, I'd expect cropping to give a better result |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bololoco
Joined: 14 Feb 2025 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bololoco wrote:
DConvert wrote: |
This looks longer than my variable M42 TC (which switches between 2x & 3x by changing the order of it's two parks).
I have several macro TCs & they all have a helicoid section, so I don't think it was intended to work as it now does.
Is there any sign that a previous owner has 'serviced' it? If so they might have put it back together wrong (elements reversed or perhaps swapped).
In any event the optical quality will be disappointing on digital, I'd expect cropping to give a better result |
I can't see anything untoward. It's fairly pristine but that doesn't mean it hasn't be tampered with. It's just weird that it's acting as a macro focusing unit and that i'm unable to focus on anything distant.
I think i'll have to take it apart anyway and see if I can alter things around inside. If not, i'll use it as is and get myself another one. They're not rare and are often found for a couple of quid.
Thanks for the help though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bololoco
Joined: 14 Feb 2025 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bololoco wrote:
marcusBMG wrote: |
mmm a teleconverter is just a compound negative lens, I would have thought most of them would be optically similar reversed - looking through a tamron 2x tc one way and then the other, virtually no difference. However the spacing of the elements from one end vs the other is very different so that could certainly produce big focus differences if it was used the other way round by swapping the male and female mounts on the ends, or if the optical block had been remounted in the shell the other way round.
But to echo previous comment, these 3x tc's are optical junk tbh
Take the optics out and use it as an extension tube. |
Thanks for the info. I'm not that knowledgable on lens optics, although I do remember doing a bit of that in school Physics....over 40 years ago.
I'll be taking it apart some point soon to see what I can do about it, although I took my previous TC apart last week and lost some of the screws...they're blinking tiny and although I had a table top prepared for the job, they still managed to disappear.
As for the quality...yes, I know they're pretty bad but i'm after the huge range.
I'll upload a picture to the digital mf gallery i took of a building 0.8 miles away with 2200mm of lens (4400mm if you include the crop factor)....it's suprisingly good if not a bit soft as long as you don't do any pixel peeping
Update....site under maintenance...it won't let me upload this pic |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jamaeolus
 Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 3034 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
With the lenses reversed it becomes a (poorly corrected) "speed booster" if I am not mistaken. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bololoco
Joined: 14 Feb 2025 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bololoco wrote:
jamaeolus wrote: |
With the lenses reversed it becomes a (poorly corrected) "speed booster" if I am not mistaken. |
Ok, so do you have any idea what has turned it into a macro focusing lens?
It's confounding me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jamaeolus
 Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 3034 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
Well...I am not familiar with this precise lens but is it possible that one of the elements has been put in upside down? How are the elements fitted into position? Most lenses have a mounting ring that screws into a base ring (sometimes even a stack of these rings) and sandwiches the element between and holds it in a precise position. Sometimes the lenses may have elements that look pretty much symmetrical are not actually perfectly biconvex or biconcave. If it then gets put in upside down it might change the optical path. Just a guess though. They are generally tightened with a spanner lens similar to the ones I showed. Other designers sometimes use a flange held down with screws around the orbit of the lens. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Slalom
 Joined: 10 Dec 2017 Posts: 168 Location: Stourbridge
|
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Slalom wrote:
Jar lids, are useful to hold smallbits when you dismantal anything |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jamaeolus
 Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 3034 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
Ok. I checked google images. The lenses appear to be held in with a ring fitted with round holes for the spanner to push. You will find them on the flat portion of the lens hold down ring. I'm not sure what kind of financial position you are in but for me on an inexpensive lens like this I would not hesitate to try home made tools. For example, an old fashioned compass might be just enough to fit in the holes and give just enough torque to loosen the hold down ring. Or you could buy a different sample of the lens. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bololoco
Joined: 14 Feb 2025 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bololoco wrote:
Slalom wrote: |
Jar lids, are useful to hold smallbits when you dismantal anything |
I bought myself one of those latex soldering mats with indentations for all the screws....it worked perfectly until I had to put the screws back and they almost literally disappeared in front of my eyes. I have 2 left out of the 5 needed to put it back together properly.
Does anyone know where I can buy such screws? They're absolutely tiny. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bololoco
Joined: 14 Feb 2025 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bololoco wrote:
jamaeolus wrote: |
Ok. I checked google images. The lenses appear to be held in with a ring fitted with round holes for the spanner to push. You will find them on the flat portion of the lens hold down ring. I'm not sure what kind of financial position you are in but for me on an inexpensive lens like this I would not hesitate to try home made tools. For example, an old fashioned compass might be just enough to fit in the holes and give just enough torque to loosen the hold down ring. Or you could buy a different sample of the lens. |
I'm somewhere between poor and not poor. I'm a self employed gardener, so really need to pull my finger out this summer.
The only problem is, I am semi allergic to soil, so would rather just take and edit photographs and walk my dog all day.
I have enough money for a few tools and I have almost 200 manual lenses, most of which need a deep clean, although only a handful are worth the effort but I suppose I could sell the ones I don't like after I've cleaned them.
I sort of think there's no such thing as a bad lens, they just need the right scene but I definitely have way too many. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bololoco
Joined: 14 Feb 2025 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bololoco wrote:
jamaeolus wrote: |
Well...I am not familiar with this precise lens but is it possible that one of the elements has been put in upside down? How are the elements fitted into position? Most lenses have a mounting ring that screws into a base ring (sometimes even a stack of these rings) and sandwiches the element between and holds it in a precise position. Sometimes the lenses may have elements that look pretty much symmetrical are not actually perfectly biconvex or biconcave. If it then gets put in upside down it might change the optical path. Just a guess though. They are generally tightened with a spanner lens similar to the ones I showed. Other designers sometimes use a flange held down with screws around the orbit of the lens. |
yes, I suppose that is definitely possible. I've yet to dismantle it to find out.....and manual teleconverters are relatively simple lenses, so hopefully it won't be difficult. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BrianSVP
 Joined: 09 Jun 2023 Posts: 451 Location: Philadelphia
|
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BrianSVP wrote:
While the slotted bits may be fine, if you're working on anything Japanese, using those cross-head (Philips) bits are going to end in tears, since despite appearing similar, they don't have the correct tip angle to use on Japanese (JIS) screws and will strip them out. Incidentally, modern Chinese lenses also typically use the Japanese-style screws. Any driver set purchased in the U.S. is going to be Philips unless it explicitly indicates JIS.
A proper set of JIS screwdrivers/tips is the very first thing I recommend anyone getting into the hobby of lens repair to purchase, as it's the only critical tool for which there really is no off-the-shelf workaround.
jamaeolus wrote: |
I'm not familiar with the lens in question. Could you post a photo? As to repair kits there are options on "that popular auction site". You will likely need a set of small screwdrivers, a set of rubber lens wrenches, and an adjustable spanner wrench.
Two types of spanner wrenches, rubber lens wrenches, and a small screwdriver kit with a multitude of different interchangeable bits.
The rubber wrench set and the spanners were from ebay at Japan Toy and Hobby. The screwdriver set I got locally at a woodworking specialty store. They no longer have them and I have tried unsuccessfully to locate that same kit online. Similar kits should be available online though. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jamaeolus
 Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 3034 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
BrianSVP, thanks for the tip on the philips lookalike drivers. I was completely unaware! Will definitely buy a set! You seem to be the best on this site for lens repair. I dabble on some of my less expensive examples but won't open any expensive things. Would you consider trading your skill for a lens of your choice? I have literally thousands of lenses but a a few really good ones I would like to have fixed. For example I have a Canon FL 300mm 2.8 with some hitches in the focus throw. You could name a few lenses you covet and I likely have a sample. Thanks. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
visualopsins
 Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11190 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Place mat in a tray -- tray sides catch screws. A strong magnet is useful for "finding" screws, parts, that have fallen to the floor (or dirt ). _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
marcusBMG
 Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1339 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
This is where I got my JIS tools:
https://www.micro-tools.de/en/Screwdrivers/Kits/JIS-Type-S-Driver-Set-Pollicis.html
(pre-brexit, I can add).
I have a set of JIS micro screwdrives and also I acquired a starrett jewellers screwdriver off ebay and bought JIS bits for it. _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Slalom
 Joined: 10 Dec 2017 Posts: 168 Location: Stourbridge
|
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2025 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Slalom wrote:
I have a few sets of JIS screw drivers, from amazon uk.plenty of feed back on sellers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RokkorDoctor
 Joined: 27 Nov 2021 Posts: 1491 Location: Kent, UK
Expire: 2025-05-01
|
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2025 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
RokkorDoctor wrote:
These are JIS, from a reliable brand (Vessel), and available in the UK:
https://amzn.eu/d/2P9yzRb _________________ Mark
SONY A7S, A7RII + dust-sealed modded Novoflex/Fotodiox/Rayqual MD-NEX adapters
Minolta SR-1, SRT-101/303, XD7/XD11, XGM, X700
Bronica SQAi
Ricoh GX100
Minolta majority of all Rokkor SR/AR/MC/MD models made
Sigma 14mm/3.5 for SR mount
Tamron SP 60B 300mm/2.8 (Adaptall)
Samyang T-S 24mm/3.5 (Nikon mount, DIY converted to SR mount)
Schneider-Kreuznach PC-Super-Angulon 28mm/2.8 (SR mount)
Bronica PS 35/40/50/65/80/110/135/150/180/200/250mm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bololoco
Joined: 14 Feb 2025 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2025 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bololoco wrote:
Thanks for the screwdriver information and links. I've heard of JIS screwdrivers so will have to get myself a set.
I already have a powerful magnet (500lb pull) but that hasn't helped me find it.
Does anyone know where I can get replacement screws for a prinz galaxy auto teleconverter? It's a waste of glass having it sat in a bag just because of a few screws. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
marcusBMG
 Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1339 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2025 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
You can get non JIS screws that will work - you need to id the size (ie diameter: M1.8, M2..).
And I have a tc or two in my junk box that may well have compatible screws... _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|