View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
connloyalist
Joined: 22 Jul 2020 Posts: 341 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2024 4:24 pm Post subject: Why different names in different markets? |
|
|
connloyalist wrote:
A question out of curiosity. I have noticed that it is not uncommon for a particular camera model to have a different name in different markets. Often it is called X in North America and Y in the rest of the world (although other variations exist of course).
Example: Minolta X500 / X570. Olympus OM-20 / OM-G (surely not for the acronym? I doubt that was even in use back then). OM-30 / OM-F. Nikomat / Nikkormat.
I am sure there are plenty of examples. But... WHY? What is the point of calling something by a different name somewhere? Especially when it is a combination of letters and numbers. Please enlighten me, because I don't get it.
Regards, C. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RokkorDoctor
Joined: 27 Nov 2021 Posts: 1405 Location: Kent, UK
Expire: 2025-05-01
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2024 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RokkorDoctor wrote:
Possibly to make it easier to clamp down on the grey market and maintain differential pricing and marketing? - easier to spot by model name and/or number rather than having to check serial numbers.
Especially for the hapless buyer it would be easier to spot a grey market item offered for sale.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_market _________________ Mark
SONY A7S, A7RII + dust-sealed modded Novoflex/Fotodiox/Rayqual MD-NEX adapters
Minolta SR-1, SRT-101/303, XD7/XD11, XGM, X700
Bronica SQAi
Ricoh GX100
Minolta majority of all Rokkor SR/AR/MC/MD models made
Sigma 14mm/3.5 for SR mount
Tamron SP 60B 300mm/2.8 (Adaptall)
Samyang T-S 24mm/3.5 (Nikon mount, DIY converted to SR mount)
Schneider-Kreuznach PC-Super-Angulon 28mm/2.8 (SR mount)
Bronica PS 35/40/50/65/80/110/135/150/180/200/250mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10956 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2024 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Accounting for tax and trade purposes. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
connloyalist
Joined: 22 Jul 2020 Posts: 341 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2024 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
connloyalist wrote:
Aha. This makes sense, thank you.
Regards, C. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10956 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2024 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
I am only assuming. And I'm picking one reasonable explanation from the many often complicated, even irrational, "real" reasons. Such happens whenever governments try to regulate.
For example, shortly after WWII, lenses and cameras could not labeled "Made In Japan". I've bought and sold some Takumars that have both "Takumar" and "Made In Japan" removed with a grinder, I assume by returning service men to fool US Customs. By the 1970s Asahi Pentax cameras and lenses could be sold iin USA only if branded Honeywell. Now all products from Japan must be labeled "Made In Japan".
The reasons get political very quickly...
EDIT:
Another example Canon EOS 300D, 20 years ago:
Quote: |
The Canon EOS 300D, manufactured by Canon, was marketed in North America as the EOS Digital Rebel, in Japan as the EOS Kiss Digital, and was also sold as the DS6041. |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_EOS_300D
To get a picture of the political-eonomic situation of the time https://www.infoplease.com/year/2003 _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
StanR92119
Joined: 10 Sep 2024 Posts: 1 Location: California USA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2024 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
StanR92119 wrote:
RokkorDoctor wrote: |
Possibly to make it easier to clamp down on the grey market and maintain differential pricing and marketing? - easier to spot by model name and/or number rather than having to check serial numbers.
Especially for the hapless buyer it would be easier to spot a grey market item offered for sale.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_market |
A lot of this boils down to warranty repairs, and who's responsible for them. For example, Nikon USA is a distributor or trading company. It isn't going to ship cameras and lenses back to Japan for repairs, as part of their distributor arrangement there's an agreement with Nippon Kogaku in terms of parts, training of repair personnel, and who pays for what when it comes to warranty repairs. Generally Nikon USA isn't going to be responsible for absorbing the cost of warranties/returns for products they did not sell and have made no profit, so the use of different model names in different markets is an easy way to determine who and where it was sold new. _________________ If I ran the world, things would be different. Not necessarily BETTER, but they would be different. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
connloyalist
Joined: 22 Jul 2020 Posts: 341 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2024 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
connloyalist wrote:
StanR92119 wrote: |
A lot of this boils down to warranty repairs, and who's responsible for them. For example, Nikon USA is a distributor or trading company. It isn't going to ship cameras and lenses back to Japan for repairs, as part of their distributor arrangement there's an agreement with Nippon Kogaku in terms of parts, training of repair personnel, and who pays for what when it comes to warranty repairs. Generally Nikon USA isn't going to be responsible for absorbing the cost of warranties/returns for products they did not sell and have made no profit, so the use of different model names in different markets is an easy way to determine who and where it was sold new. |
This is the best answer I have seen, thank you. And by the way, welcome to MF Lenses
Regards, C. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7786 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2024 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
I am only assuming. And I'm picking one reasonable explanation from the many often complicated, even irrational, "real" reasons. Such happens whenever governments try to regulate.
For example, shortly after WWII, lenses and cameras could not labeled "Made In Japan". I've bought and sold some Takumars that have both "Takumar" and "Made In Japan" removed with a grinder, I assume by returning service men to fool US Customs. By the 1970s Asahi Pentax cameras and lenses could be sold iin USA only if branded Honeywell. Now all products from Japan must be labeled "Made In Japan".
The reasons get political very quickly...
EDIT:
Another example Canon EOS 300D, 20 years ago:
Quote: |
The Canon EOS 300D, manufactured by Canon, was marketed in North America as the EOS Digital Rebel, in Japan as the EOS Kiss Digital, and was also sold as the DS6041. |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_EOS_300D
To get a picture of the political-eonomic situation of the time https://www.infoplease.com/year/2003 |
After WW2 there seemed to be a lot of these 'regulations'. I can remember as a young boy that there were all kinds of restrictions and taxes on imported 'luxury goods' to the UK.
I can remember my Father buying a nice Swiss watch from a shady guy back in the late 1960's that was smuggled into the UK, I still have it and wear it regularly. There was a lot of of legislation about International trade back then. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4744 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2024 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
When I was in the trade people used to buy cameras cheap in Japan or the US. if there was a problem with it the warranty wasn't covered in UK and it had to be sent back to Japan for repair.
(Then camcorders came out. People bought them cheap in the US or Asia and later discovered that they wouldn't work with UK TVs)
However the answer is pricing. Looking through the US magazines in 1979 (ish) cameras were priced the same in $ as they were in £. Just about half the price. Japan was even cheaper. _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7786 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2024 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
philslizzy wrote: |
When I was in the trade people used to buy cameras cheap in Japan or the US. if there was a problem with it the warranty wasn't covered in UK and it had to be sent back to Japan for repair.
(Then camcorders came out. People bought them cheap in the US or Asia and later discovered that they wouldn't work with UK TVs)
However the answer is pricing. Looking through the US magazines in 1979 (ish) cameras were priced the same in $ as they were in £. Just about half the price. Japan was even cheaper. |
In the 80's we went to the USA and Canada quite often, and the first thing I did was buy the Photography magazines to pore over the prices, then I'd make sure we went to some big town or city and hit up Ritz Camera's or whoever were in the malls. Sometimes the $ was two to one against the £ - happy days, I bought very little brand new kit here in the UK, or indeed used kit. Which was safer to get through UK Customs with. I remember buying so much used stuff in Toronto they threw in a used but nearly new big Habuka case for me to carry the stuff out of the store! _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|