View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2024 11:37 pm Post subject: Kodak Retinar 2.5/90 |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Kodak Retinar 2.5/90 is another high grade metal-barrel slide projection lens. The barrel diameter is larger than the standard 42.5mm and touches 52mm thus joining some Agfa lenses, such as Agolon and Agomar.
The following shots are taken with Sony Nex and the "sanitary" PVC adapter. At one moment the adapter was slightly misplaced from the basement, and that created tilt effect visible in some shots. It is inobservable in some others.
A couple of shots are similar to the ones taken with Will-Wetzlar Lumagon 2.8/50 MC, so might be directly compared with.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11022 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2024 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Very nice! _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2024 8:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Thank you, visualopsins!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
simple.joy
Joined: 30 May 2022 Posts: 643
|
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2024 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
simple.joy wrote:
Looks great - very nice shots! Do you know if Kodak made them or if they were outsourced? Is there any "Made in…" on it? _________________ ---
Manual lens enthusiast
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2024 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Thank you so much!
I was making the same question. No signs of origin. Even the letters on the beauty ring look, how to say it better, pretty generic.
But this does not hurt the lens' merits.
#1
#2
#3
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2024 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
The issue of the lacking diaphragm in this projector lens at the bright sun is resolved with "finger aperture", i.e. putting two or more fingers in front of the lens, as a quick way to lower the brightness, while the camera is in aperture priority mode. Sometimes this gives a red or rose tint to the image, kind of retro or expired film effect. Sometimes it hurts sharpness on the edges of the shot, as pressing fingers slightly distorts the reception of the relevant parts of the image. In some other cases the resulting frame is just very good. Anyway, post processing of bright sunlight shots, even "finger diaphragmed" requires negative exposure compensation, sometimes halving the original one in order to restore colour vibrance and detail.
Here are some samples from the wild taken and PPed in such a way. After changing the scenery from the shaded urban to a sun drenched one, sharpness, colour and overall plasticity of the image remain equally good even in quite severe exercise of exposure corrections.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2024 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
A resized stitched pano, clickable
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|