| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
kiddo
 Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1592
|
 Posted: Tue May 07, 2024 10:19 am Post subject: B+W 655 Soft Image |
|
 Posted: Tue May 07, 2024 10:19 am Post subject: B+W 655 Soft Image |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
I have the Zeiss softar 1 on 55mm so I've decided to get one for Minolta Apo200mm but I've only found the B+W 655 soft image, so are these filters any worth it nowadays or one could get same effect through software (of course it would take some time ) - I understand B+W built this filter after buying Zeiss patent, am I right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
visualopsins
 Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11638 Location: California
Expire: 2027-07-11
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2024 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2024 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Anybody know?  _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Solinon 1:5.6/18 ASPH.
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RokkorDoctor
 Joined: 27 Nov 2021 Posts: 1559 Location: Kent, UK
Expire: 2025-05-01
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2024 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2024 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
RokkorDoctor wrote:
I assume you are aware of the Minolta Portrayer series P (P1,P2,P3) and S (S1,S2) filters? Available used in 55mm and 72mm filter thread.
The P series cause a green-magenta diffusion effect specifically targeted at masking skin imperfections.
The S series are not wavelength specific and more suitable for general softening.
They are also a decent alternative to the Softar. They are easily found on e.g. eBay and are usually not all that expensive for a boxed set.
https://portrayer.wordpress.com/2014/04/01/minolta-portrayer-filters/
https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/comparison-of-portrayers-filters-soft-focus.27817/
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/497025/ _________________ Mark
SONY A7S, A7RII + dust-sealed modded Novoflex/Fotodiox/Rayqual MD-NEX adapters
Minolta SR-1, SRT-101/303, XD7/XD11, XGM, X700
Bronica SQAi
Ricoh GX100
Minolta majority of all Rokkor SR/AR/MC/MD models made
Sigma 14mm/3.5 for SR mount
Tamron SP 60B 300mm/2.8 (Adaptall)
Samyang T-S 24mm/3.5 (Nikon mount, DIY converted to SR mount)
Schneider-Kreuznach PC-Super-Angulon 28mm/2.8 (SR mount)
Bronica PS 35/40/50/65/80/110/135/150/180/200/250mm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kiddo
 Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1592
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2024 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
thank you for that info, i had no clue about these Minolta filters, never seen them for sale neither, but you share valuable information, now i´m really curious about the results as i could not find any portraits or comparison with the filters i do have |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kds315*
 Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16902 Location: Kehl, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
 Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2024 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2024 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Most ppl use software now for such. In earlier times nylon stockings over the front lens worked as well
There are special soft focus lens available too, I have several. Was never really that happy with soft filters
although I have a few older ones from ZEISS...
Look here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums/72157624557978060/
The KENKO SF lens: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums/72157625383753654/ _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kiddo
 Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1592
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
i really like the drawing of some of these shots, especially when multiple colors blend together (even my daughter agreed that she really liked the results, as being totally different from nowadays sharp/perfect images). I have no doubt that these results might be possible through edition, but filters and special lenses have their place for whomever is not really up to stay in front of the screen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|